Dan McClellan is back to offer insights into common views of the Bible, including Evangelical and Latter-day Saint perspectives. He suggests that Latter-day Saints should be open to the Bible’s potential inaccuracies and dives into the intricate topic of authorship, revealing that many individuals contributed to the texts over a thousand years.
McClellan challenges literal interpretations of biblical figures like Moses and Adam based on available data, but doesn’t stop there! He also explores gender roles, slavery, and polygamy in biblical contexts, revealing how ancient societies influenced these aspects. End-time prophecies, the concept of Hell, and their development are also examined.
McClellan advocates for a nuanced approach to the Bible, emphasizing the importance of understanding its genre and historical context. The interview encourages critical engagement with this ancient and complex text.
1801: Mormon Bible Scholar – Dan McClellan Part 1
1803: How “Thoughtful” Mormons Stay in the Church – Dan McClellan Part 3
Dan McClellan
- Data Over Dogma – Podcast
- Dan McClellan – website for classes
- Dan McClellan – TikTok
- Dan McClellan – Instagram
- Dan McClellan – Twitter
- Dan McClellan – Facebook
- Dan McClellan – YouTube
- Dan McClellan – LinkTree
- Dan’s Online Courses – Didaskaloi
- Publications by Dan McClellan
- Biography of Dan McClellan
Mormon Stories Thanks Our Generous Donors!
Help us continue to deliver quality content by becoming a donor today:
Our Platforms:
Contact us:
MormonStories@gmail.com
PO Box 171085, Salt Lake City, UT 84117
Social Media:
Show Notes:
Dan McClellan
- Data Over Dogma – Podcast
- Dan McClellan – website for classes
- Dan McClellan – TikTok
- Dan McClellan – Instagram
- Dan McClellan – Twitter
- Dan McClellan – Facebook
- Dan McClellan – YouTube
- Dan McClellan – LinkTree
- Dan’s Online Courses – Didaskaloi
- Publications by Dan McClellan
- Biography of Dan McClellan
Mormon Stories Related
- 1013-1016: David Bokovoy – Bible Scholar, Former CES Employee
- 1019-1022: David Bokovoy – Applying Higher Criticism to Mormon Scripture
- 493-494; 497-499b: Brent Metcalfe – Early Years, Mark Hofmann, the Salamander Letter, the Bombings, the Book of Abraham, and Life After Mormonism
- Questions for Brent Metcalfe
Other
- Shawn Bradley – BYU basketball player
- Peter Breinholt
- Authoring the Old Testament by David Bokovoy
- David Wright – Isaiah in the Book of Mormon
- Lehi in the Dessert by Hugh Nibley
- Kent Jackson’s response to Hugh Nibley
- The Ritual Animal by Harvey Whitehouse
- The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version 5th Edition
- Did God Have A Wife? by William Dever
- The Myth of the Twelve Tribes of Israel by Andrew Tobolowsky
- Jesus Before the Gospels by Bart Ehrman
- Armageddon: What the Bible Really Says About the End By Bart Ehrman
The audio and MP3 download still play part 1 instead of part 2. Can that be updated please? Thank you!
Updated! Thank you Kyle!
I found all five hours utterly enthralling listening. Dan McClellan’s contribution to the community that Mormon Stories serves is of incalculable benefit, to say nothing of the impact his work must be having on the Judao-Christian world in general. My only disappointment is in his alternative spelling of his name as Maklelen – his Scottish ancestors must surely be turning in their graves!
I would be interested to know Dan’s views about which English translation of the Bible best reflects the manuscripts – such that exist. The following is a link to a podcast of a lecture given by 17th-century historian, Professor Pauline Croft of Royal Holloway College, London in 2011, on the occasion of the 400th anniversary of the James I bible (https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/making-king-james-authorised-version-bible-1604-1611) Clearly the 1604-11 translation was undertaken at a time of great political turmoil (Gunpowder Plot 1605) in Britain, where the Scottish King was attempting to establish his authority at Westminster in the face of the increasing influence and belligerence of Parliament. Croft describes some of this political background and how James particularly disliked the then most recent English translation – the 1560 Geneva Bible – because of inter-alia its marginal references to the tyranny of many of the kings. James was desperate to present monarchy in a good light.
It would be interesting to know what Dan thinks about this translation – so overwhelmingly favoured by LDS authority. And also the extent to which English translations are faithful to the manuscripts.