In this screencast recorded early in Mormon Stories’ history, John Dehlin introduces himself as a fifth- or sixth-generation Mormon and a descendant of Ezra Taft Benson who was, at the time, still active in the church and serving as an Elders Quorum instructor, then lays out why people leave the LDS Church and what family and friends can do to help. He opens by explaining that the purpose of walking through uncomfortable or controversial material isn’t to expose people to it for its own sake, but so that those who want to support someone in a faith crisis can understand the mindset and information that got them there. He plays an audio clip that lists specific historical and archaeological objections often raised about the Book of Mormon, including the absence of steel, horses, and elephants in the pre-Columbian Americas, and the lack of any physical evidence of the wars the text describes. He also raises church-history issues that surprise many members: statements from Gordon B. Hinckley distancing himself from the idea that humans become gods, the church’s position that polygamy was not doctrinal, the fact that the Word of Wisdom was not treated as a binding commandment until the early 1900s, and evidence that Joseph Smith drank wine and kept a bar in his home.
From there Dehlin turns to what friends and family should not do when someone is questioning or leaving: fear them, judge them, distance themselves, or, as he puts it, turn them into a project. He draws on the philosophical distinction between treating someone as a full person, an I-Thou relationship, versus as an object to be managed or changed, an I-It relationship. He closes by asking listeners to keep perspective: no church, government, business, or marriage is free of serious flaws, so leaving the Mormon Church in search of a flawless alternative is not really a solution.
What’s covered
- 00:01 Introduction and scope of the presentation
- 04:28 Why members leave and what they experience
- 23:55 Audio clip: archaeological objections to the Book of Mormon
- 33:57 Questions about church doctrine and history
- 41:44 How to support those who are leaving
- 50:31 Keeping perspective and moving forward
Episode Transcript
Full text · 9,700 words · 5 chaptersHost: John DehlinRead transcriptHide transcript
This transcript is machine-generated and lightly edited for readability. The audio is authoritative. Please excuse occasional errors in names and spelling.
Introduction and Scope of the Presentation
John Dehlin [00:00:01] Hello and welcome to my first Mormon themed screencast entitled why People Leave the LDS Church and what Family, Friends and Community Can Do About It. My name is John Dehlin. Just to tell you a little bit about me. I'm a fifth or sixth generation Mormon. I'm a descendant or relative of Ezra T. Benson, which also means I'm distant cousin of Ezra Taft Benson. Also Samuel Rose Parkinson. The P in my middle initial stands for Parkinson. I'm a lifelong member of the church, 36 years old. I'm still quite active in the church.
John Dehlin [00:00:42] I served a mission in Guatemala and also four months in Arizona, full mission, was a zone leader there in both missions. I was married in the Washington D.C. temple. I'm married with four children. I'm currently serving as Elders Quorum instructor in my ward here in North Logan in Utah, and also a former early morning seminary instructor. So I just felt like it was important to begin this presentation by letting you know that this presentation doesn't come from an anti Mormon, an ex Mormon, someone who's got it out against the church.
John Dehlin [00:01:22] Some of you might even accuse me of being a wolf in sheep's clothing. But I just want to state on the record that I'm a devoted, active member of the church, committed to making the church a better place and to doing my part within it. And I wanted to sort of get that out in front.
John Dehlin [00:01:42] Now, every year, thousands of devout members of the LDS Church leave it or go inactive. And you might want to think that these are just, you know, maybe converts that quickly fall inactive. But the truth is, many of the people I know are like me, fifth or sixth generation Mormons. They descend from prominent church leaders, including Brigham Young and Joseph Smith.
John Dehlin [00:02:06] Many of them are returned missionaries who have been married to the temple who have large families. That's sort of the profile of many of the people that are leaving the church each year, especially when they leave due to historical or doctrinal issues.
John Dehlin [00:02:25] A recent Salt Lake Tribune article highlighted very publicly what's been known in sort of the circles I've been running in for quite some time, which is that basically 2/3 of the church is inactive. So, you know, there are 4 to 5 million active members of the church, but there are 7 to 8 million inactive. In fact, they say that a third of the church, they don't even know where the people are. These people don't call themselves Mormons. They were baptized and immediately fell away.
John Dehlin [00:02:55] And so we're looking at only sort of a third to maybe 2/5 of the church membership actually being active in the church. So you know, this is something very important to keep in mind. Inactivity. There are more inactive Mormons than active Mormons both in and outside of Utah.
John Dehlin [00:03:14] It's very easy to throw labels on these people who have fallen away to say that they're sinners, that they must have some sin, they just want to drink alcohol or have illicit sex or take drugs or whatever. It's very easy to say that these people are just weak.
John Dehlin [00:03:31] Maybe they weren't as valiant in the pre existence. It's easy to say that they stopped going to the temple or they stopped reading the scriptures and that's why they fell away. Or you can just blame it on the Internet and say, oh that dang Internet. Or anti Mormon literature. They stumbled upon that and now they've left. But the truth is those are cop outs in many instances. Sometimes they may be true, but in many, many instances that I've come across, these are not what's at the core of why many people are leaving the church. And in fact, to those who have serious issues with the church, these assumptions are highly, highly insulting.
John Dehlin [00:04:07] Yet they're the ones that often seem to be offered, most often as reasons or justifications or attempts to explain why people leave. So now I'd like to sort of take a moment to answer the question, why would anyone leave the LDS Church?
Why Members Leave and What They Experience
John Dehlin [00:04:28] If you really want to help them or love them, or be their friend, or treat them in a Christlike way, you must know what they're thinking and feeling. You certainly cannot befriend them or reach them or help them if they need help, if you don't understand where they're coming from. So part of the purpose of this presentation is to give you a sense for their mindset and why people leave.
John Dehlin [00:04:53] So I'm going to give you sort of a brief synopsis of how it happens. In my experience, I will be listing some controversial or unpleasant aspects of Mormonism. And I just want to tell you up front that the only reason I'm doing it is not to just expose you to dangerous things, but if you want to help these people, you have to know where they're at, what got them to the place they're at, so that you can then work with them or talk to them or love them and just understand where they're coming from.
John Dehlin [00:05:25] In my experience, it usually happens in this way. There's some seminal event in their lives that raises an important question about Mormonism. Let's say they're called as a seminary or a gospel doctrine teacher, which was true in my case, all of a sudden they want to learn more about the church and they want to be a better teacher. So they start digging into church history.
John Dehlin [00:05:47] Or maybe they're watching some random TV show and all of a sudden it mentions Mormons in a way that they're unfamiliar. Or maybe there's some big news event that has to do with Mormonism that's pretty controversial, that makes them start asking or thinking about some questions. Or maybe they stumble across some book or magazine article that talks about Mormonism in a way they're not familiar. And of course, there's always the option of some close family or friend announcing that they're leaving the church. That can be very jolting to some and of course, stumbling upon anti Mormon literature. But there's always some sort of event that kicks off a quest for further knowledge and understanding.
John Dehlin [00:06:24] It's usually not done with the intent to leave, but instead to be a better member, to follow the admonition, to study things out in our mind, you know, to seek truth, to be lovers of truth and of wisdom.
John Dehlin [00:06:37] And that's, in my experience, how it often starts. But from there it becomes difficult. You know, some examples include a recent south park episode where it talks about the life of Joseph Smith. And while it's talking about it, it shows Joseph Smith sticking his head in a hat reading from a peep stone. And then it shows Oliver Cowdery translating. And people would ask, now what is that? Why is Joseph sticking his head in a hat? That's something, you know, I've never heard of. We'll talk about that more soon. Or maybe it's the Larry King interview where Gordon B. Hinckley comes on and Larry King asks him what the church's view is on polygamy.
John Dehlin [00:07:17] And Gordon B. Hinckley answers, it's not doctrinal. You know, for many within the church who heard that statement, it was a shock. Or, you know, when Larry King asked President Hinckley, you know, what's your thoughts on God once being a man? And President Hinckley's response was something to the effect of, oh, well, I don't know much about that. I don't know that we teach it. I don't know that we emphasize it. You know, for the average Mormon who's grown up in the church, statements like that can be very shocking and confusing.
John Dehlin [00:07:47] Or the recent Newsweek article that says things like mentioning the printing press that was destroyed. Most people probably don't know about the Nauvoo Expositor and the printing press that was destroyed as a precursor to Joseph's incarceration in Carthage in his martyrdom. Or maybe many people, including me, don't know that Joseph Smith had 30 wives. I didn't learn this until I was 30 years old after a lifetime in the church, and that he had massive debts and hundreds of enemies.
John Dehlin [00:08:18] We don't learn about Joseph's weaknesses in church, and so when we read about it in a magazine, all of a sudden it can become troublesome. Another quote was from this article, was that decades of serious and honest scholarship have failed to uncover credible evidence that these Book of Mormon civilizations ever existed. Which is a quote from Simon Sotherton. But the point isn't that these are smoking guns that say the church isn't true, but what they are are things that Mormons often don't hear in church, hear throughout their lives. And when they hear it for the first time in mainstream media or outside the church, it becomes shocking and sends them on a quest to learn more, you know, news events.
John Dehlin [00:09:02] One example is the Mark Hoffman affair, where, you know, an ingenious young man who was also quite diabolical is able to fool Boyd K. Packer and Spence W. Kimball and Gordon B. Hinckley and forge documents, convince the Brethren, who we would all expect to have extra special powers of premonition and of being good judges of character and having the spirit of discernment, which is an unfair expectation probably, but we do expect it. And we ask why they weren't more in tune with the Holy Ghost to know that Mark Hoffman was a fraud and to keep the two murders that happened from happening. So those are, you know, that's another type of event that would set someone off with questions.
John Dehlin [00:09:45] And of course, Elder Oaks himself has acknowledged that, that the Brethren were fooled. And you know, one very classic way that people start on this quest is by just reading church history. The Journal of Discourses is full of quotes that I think the church is frankly embarrassed about. Now, whether it's Brigham Young's racist quotes or his teachings of Adam, God theory or blood atonement, these are teachings that we've distanced ourselves from officially as a church.
John Dehlin [00:10:19] And we de emphasize and even try and say that we don't believe these things anymore. And of course, a book like Fawn Brody's no Man Knows My History, written By David Owen McKay's niece, viewed by many as one of the most important biographies of Joseph Smith, can just do sincere damage to your view of Joseph Smith relative to how you sort of viewed him when you were growing up.
John Dehlin [00:10:48] So once these seminal events occur In a Mormon's life, you know, one of the first things they do now on the Internet is go to Google and they type in some questions. And of course, as soon as they do, you know, there are several websites that are there ready to talk about these issues. Unfortunately, none of them are the church websites because the church doesn't really like to deal with these issues in any depth. So there are no official church responses on these issues that are in any way substantive. There are some apologetic sites, and sometimes those are helpful, but for many people, apologetic techniques just don't work.
John Dehlin [00:11:28] They turn people off and even make them feel the church is less credible. So where they often turn are ex Mormon or anti Mormon sites where people have a lot of anger, sometimes justifiably so, a lot of frustration.
John Dehlin [00:11:45] And that's sort of what leads them to quickly want to leave the church and ask to have their records removed from the church. If I had to sort of explain or summarize what happened in this quest. We Mormons oftentimes are taught, growing up throughout our entire lives, that the world is black and white, that there is bad in the world and good. And anything you come across in the world can be put in one of those two categories. The world is either black or it is white. It is a very simple point of view, and that is how we see it. Prophets, good. Scriptures, perfect.
John Dehlin [00:12:24] The church, good, perfect. Everything is under control. General authority is inspired, and everything is either good or bad. And other churches bad. Other scriptures that aren't ours, bad. And that's sort of how we see the world. Non Mormons not as good as Mormons. Our church true. All other churches false.
John Dehlin [00:12:46] And once a Mormon starts digging into this history and the culture, we realize that there is such a thing as a prophet who has made major mistakes. There is such a thing as a church that has made major mistakes. There is such a thing as scriptures that have flaws, even LDS scriptures that have flaws. And all of a sudden they start seeing the world for the first time in shades and degrees and color. And it is quite a complex new worldview. And what you see between these two images is a huge gap.
John Dehlin [00:13:23] And that gap is dramatic and it's shocking. And this is sort of what someone who's left the church experiences. Their whole world crumbles and they see the world in a different light for the very first time. It doesn't have to be a bad thing. But if there aren't the right supports and role models, for example, to be there when they go through this, it can have disastrous consequences. For them, for their family, etc.
John Dehlin [00:13:54] So when their world falls apart, what do they do? Now, what I'd like to do is give you an introduction to the major issues that the average person leaves the church over. And I want to make three disclaimers about it.
John Dehlin [00:14:12] Everything I show you here can be easily substantiated through church publications. So I'm not bringing up a bunch of stuff that's found just in people who hated the prophet, and so they wrote bad things about them that are lies.
John Dehlin [00:14:27] I did my best to create this presentation only from stuff that can be substantiated through church publications, through the Ensign, through Times and Seasons, through Millennial Star, through the journal Discourses, through official church publications. So most of the stuff the apostles and prophets themselves have acknowledged and found some way to try and defend. So know that at the outset.
John Dehlin [00:14:53] Also know that this is not an exercise in me blaming the brethren, saying that they are bad, saying that I am better than them, or no more than the Brethren. Most of these issues I don't lay at the feet of the brethren, but instead with the general membership or frankly, with just humanity and the flaws of people.
John Dehlin [00:15:11] But I just wanted to sort of get that out in the open. And then finally, nothing in this entire presentation do I believe is a smoking gun that proves that the church is not true or not inspired by God. Not one thing here. So know that even though I'm showing you, I'm about to show you some really hard things. To me, none of this stuff should be viewed as, like I said, a smoking gun.
John Dehlin [00:15:35] So what I learned growing up in the church about Joseph Smith, he was a pure and innocent boy, so strong and noble that when he was having major surgery on his leg, he turned down alcohol. He saw God and Jesus in the sacred grove. He translated the Book of Mormon using the Urim and Thummim.
John Dehlin [00:15:55] He had one wife, Emma. I had never heard of any other wife that Joseph had in my entire young and adult life. And of course, that he was falsely accused and persecuted several times, went to the jail in Carthage like a lamb to the slaughter. And ultimately, no other man has done more for the salvation of others than Joseph Smith, save Jesus Christ.
John Dehlin [00:16:23] Once you start studying church history and church documents, you find out that the history and the facts tell us additional things. So aside from all the good stuff that we know about Joseph, we also learn some things that are quite shocking. For example, that in his youth, he used a magical peep stone to help people try and find buried treasure. There are many sources for this he admitted it himself. This is not, not speculation. This is fact. And any reputable historian or credible church authority will acknowledge that this is true.
John Dehlin [00:16:56] And you know, I know that when you were growing up, you likely heard that there were court cases that Joseph was involved in. Oftentimes, you know, at least a few of these court cases were because, you know, people were prosecuting Joseph for activities that were viewed as illegal, like, like treasure seeking or mysticism or black magic or whatever it was called in the day. I am not an expert here, but this is something that people are not taught growing up. And so it is often hard for them to learn for the first time.
John Dehlin [00:17:30] The first vision itself has several different versions. So the first time Joseph told or wrote down the first vision story, he only mentioned that he saw Christ, and he didn't mentioned God the Father and two personages, and he didn't mention that he was told to start a new church. He just said that they had to talk about his worthiness, etc.
John Dehlin [00:17:52] And as the story gets told over the 10 or 15 years after he started writing it down, you will see that it evolves, it enhances and changes. And while there are people who have tried to make really good explanations for that, these differences are significant in my view, and are at least sort of something that would cause someone to question or wonder why he didn't get that story right the first time and keep it consistent throughout, especially when it was such an important event.
John Dehlin [00:18:26] You know, you also learn, just like from that south park episode, that the traditional way that we've been taught, that Joseph translated the Book of Mormon, which is sitting behind a veil with a Urim and Thummimon with the plates in front of him. Translating character by character is not the way that those who are in the room with him say that he actually did it, especially during the Oliver Cowdery portions of the translation. Instead, what even Russell M. Nelson himself has acknowledged is that Joseph took that same peep stone that he used to find treasure, buried treasure, stuck it in a hat, stuck his face in the hat, and would then read off the Book of Mormon without the plates even being in the room.
John Dehlin [00:19:11] And this is pretty much accepted as fact now by those who understand the translation process. So that's a shocker. Why did he have the plates if he wasn't going to use them in the translation process? Why was he sticking his head in a hat? No one's ever told me that before. Yet that is the way it happened.
John Dehlin [00:19:29] Not that this is a smoking gun, because the word of Wisdom wasn't made really law in the church until the 20th century. But Joseph Smith drank beer and wine as an adult. He even drank wine the night before he was martyred in Carthage. He says this in his own journal.
John Dehlin [00:19:46] It is also shocking to find out that Joseph had 30 wives. If you go to familysearch.org, which is the church's genealogical website, it acknowledges that some of these wives were actually married to other men at the time that he was sealed to them and these men were living. So imagine if I went to someone else's wife and said, will you marry me? Don't tell your husband.
John Dehlin [00:20:12] Imagine what that would be like. And that's sort of what the data show. These are facts. Also, several of these women were teenagers. And you kind of wonder why Joseph was marrying 14 year old girls, for example. Also, you find out that throughout his entire time of practicing polygamy, whenever he was asked publicly if he was practicing polygamy, he denied it.
John Dehlin [00:20:38] I'm pretty sure Elder Oaks has acknowledged that this is a fact. It's in church publications. So in essence, Joseph Smith did not tell the truth about the fact that he is practicing polygamy. That is disturbing to many people.
John Dehlin [00:20:51] And of course, when a second counselor in the First Presidency actually left the church and created a newspaper telling the world that Joseph was in fact lying and he was practicing polygamy, Joseph ordered that the printing press be destroyed.
John Dehlin [00:21:14] And that's what led to him being put in jail in Carthage, which ultimately led to his martyrdom. So these are facts, and they're quite different from the standard story we hear growing up. None of them prove that Joseph Smith wasn't inspired by God, but they certainly are quite shocking. And you can bet that your Mormon friend or family member who's left the church has come across most of these issues.
John Dehlin [00:21:39] So how about scripture in the Book of Mormon? You know, we learned that the Book of Mormon is the most correct book on earth. It was found in Hill Cumorah in New York, where it was buried by Moroni. We learned that it is a history of Native Americans of Central, south and North America and even the Pacific Islands.
John Dehlin [00:21:56] And we know that the Book of Abraham was translated from a papyrus that Joseph Smith got, I believe in Kirtland. You know, that's what we know about the scriptures, Mormon scriptures. Well, the facts are quite interesting. We find out in reality that there have been over 4,000 changes made to the Book of Mormon since it was created. A lot of them are minor, but some of them are quite significant.
John Dehlin [00:22:24] People have tried to pay attention to the geography in the Book of Mormon with the narrow neck of land and the waters of. And all the other issues surrounding how long it took people to march places and settle places. No one's ever been able to find any geography that really credibly maps to what's in the Book of Mormon.
John Dehlin [00:22:45] Cumorah. We know that Joseph Smith got the plates from the hill Cumorah in New York, but it doesn't really seem to jive with the geography. Where's the narrow neck of land? Where are the waters of Mormon? You know, it certainly probably wasn't around New York and most of the civilization that we know about that built temples and all sorts of things the Book of Mormon described as in Central America. But there's no way that Moroni lugged plates that were £150 all the way up to New York by himself walking to bury them there. So, of course, apostles and others have tried to say that there were maybe two cumorahs, et cetera, et cetera.
John Dehlin [00:23:27] But the truth is, this starts to sound a little bit sketchy. And then you think about all the anachronisms in the Book of Mormon. Anachronisms meaning something being out of place chronologically. So an example would be in a movie about the 18th century. If they had airplanes in a movie in the 1700s, that would be out of place. Well, there are lots of things in the Book of Mormon that, when taken on face value, are chronologically out of place.
▶ Video Clip 1Video Clip 1 [00:23:55] Steel was never invented by the Native Americans. Yet the Book of Mormon mentions steel. Steel swords and armor, etc. All the bones for the millions of soldiers who were died and killed. Where are they? Why haven't we found piles and piles and piles of bones? We certainly have in Europe and Asia. Why not in America? We know that horses were not found anywhere in the United States, in the world, in Central, south or North America before the Spaniards came here, it was the Spaniards who brought horses. They did not find the Aztecs or the Mayas or the Incas on horses. There just weren't any. Elephants haven't existed on the American continents since 10,000 B.C.
Video Clip 1 [00:24:44] as I understand it, there certainly wasn't any steel. And if there was steel, why haven't we found the swords and the helmets and the breastplates for the millions of soldiers who killed each other? Yet not one steel sword or breastplate, etc. Has been found.
Video Clip 1 [00:25:00] Why is that? Barley and wheat, for example, were domesticated in Europe and have sophisticated methods to grow them. None of that stuff was here yet. The Book of Mormon mentions it being used, a seven day calendar, etc. All these things are sort of out of place. And so it makes you wonder in the Book of Mormon why those things are there.
Video Clip 1 [00:25:22] Many of you have probably heard of the DNA controversies, those who have sort of done DNA tests on Native Americans. Over 95% of the DNA test of the people tested, Native Americans tested show that their lineage goes straight to Asia, meaning they crossed the Bering Strait, not came over on a boat from Israel and were Israelites. And so now we've backed off. For 150 years, the general authorities have called the Native Americans Lamanites. And now we don't do that anymore because we really don't know if they're Lamanites. And we're starting to say that the Book of Mormon happened maybe in a very small part of America and we don't know quite where.
Video Clip 1 [00:26:02] But then how did millions and millions of people show up? So these are very important questions that are fair questions. They are not just nitpicky trying to find fault in the church, but they are legitimate questions that call into question for many the historicity or the authenticity of the Book of Mormon.
Video Clip 1 [00:26:23] And finally, there was a book that was written when Oliver Cowdery was still living back in his hometown by a preacher. And this book was called A View of the Hebrews. And while no one claims that the Book of Mormon was taken word for word or even in large chunks from the view of the Hebrews, it's very interesting to note that this book, View of the Hebrews claimed basically that a group of people left Israel and sailed to America in a boat and started civilizations in America, and that there were good and bad tribes within America that fought each other and that these Israelis became the inhabitants and the ancestors of the current modern day American Indians.
Video Clip 1 [00:27:10] You know, why was this book written five or ten years before the Book of Mormon? You know, things like this cause people who are credible just trying to understand truth to ask these questions. And of course, finally, the Book of Abraham, Experts now agree, including Hugh Nibley, that the Book of Abraham is not a translation from the papyrus that Joseph Smith had. Instead, those papyrus were funeral texts that were used whenever someone died in Egypt. But everyone, including LDS scholars who have read them, agree that there is really no significant correlation between the papyrus and what Joseph produced as the Book of Abraham.
Video Clip 1 [00:27:59] So this is shocking stuff to find out for the first time, especially when you have been a member of the church your whole life. How about church leadership? We are told to follow the Prophet, that the prophet talks with God, that the words of modern prophets are scripture, and that when the brethren have spoken, the discussion ends. You know, we're told that Bruce Alberkonki's book Mormon Doctrine was just that, Mormon doctrine.
Video Clip 1 [00:28:24] We're told that LDS general authorities are among the most righteous people in the world, or at least that's how we're raised culturally to feel. And the history and facts tell us that this isn't always the case. In spite of having some great leaders who have been great inspired men and women, they have not been perfect. We all know that Brigham Young taught, for example, that Adam was God and that God was Adam. This was called the Adam God Theory. And he taught it all through the Journal Discourses. And it's something that we no longer teach or really believe as a church. He taught that blood atonement, that the best thing you can do for someone who's committed certain types of sins is kill them on the spot, and that that's a favor that you can do for somebody if they've committed certain sins.
Video Clip 1 [00:29:08] One of those sins being a white person marrying a black person, he felt that that was punishable by death. We all know that. You know, if we've read the Journal Discourses and if you saw the previous slide, that Brigham Young was racist and he said some horrible things about black people, including the fact that they would never ever receive the president priesthood in this life until the millennium.
Video Clip 1 [00:29:34] As far as the Journal Discourses go, we as a church have completely distanced ourselves from them. You won't see many quotes from the Journal Discourses in modern church curricula. In fact, as I understand it, at Salt Lake, the editors and the writers of church manuals have been told use the Journal of Discourses only as a last result.
Video Clip 1 [00:29:56] And so we're distancing ourselves from that. Those who have studied how we've handled church history can say without being unfair, that we've been less than candid. It's not that we've hidden everything, it's not that we've lied, but we certainly haven't been open and up front about our history as a church.
Video Clip 1 [00:30:16] There have been many changes. This notion that the church is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow and forever is not true. Major teachings have been changed, including polygamy. It was once taught that polygamy was a requirement for the celestial kingdom and an eternal law. And now we are being told that it is not doctrinal. I know that there are explanations for that, but the truth is polygamy is doctrinal it is being practiced today in Mormon temples when someone's spouse dies and they remarry.
Video Clip 1 [00:30:49] Plural marriages happen in the Mormon temple today with those who are marrying someone whose former spouse passed away. Also blacks. It was once taught that blacks would never receive the priesthood and now we don't even talk about how they were unworthy in the preexistence, etc.
Video Clip 1 [00:31:11] We have even read in recent publications that David O. McKay believed that the ban on the blacks was actually church policy, but not church doctrine. You know, these are mind blowing major shifts in perspective that a Mormon confronts.
Video Clip 1 [00:31:29] We've read recently about how the book Mormon Doctrine was received with anger by the First Presidency by David O. McKay, that he was furious that Bruce R. McConkie called at Mormon Doctrine, that he commissioned a study that found over 1,000 errors in the book, that Elder McConkie was punished and censured for doing it, and that a rule was created as a result from then on saying that no general authority could publish a book without church permission. And he was told not to ever publish the book again. And in fact the Brethren seriously considered publicly censuring him and decided not to because they didn't want to undermine the authority or the mantle of the general authority.
Video Clip 1 [00:32:13] You know, that's shocking to find out because many of us used that book for years and years and years as being doctrine, as being the gospel. Of course, most of you are familiar with Paul H. Dunn, who was a general authority, who while being a good man, claimed that he was a professional baseball player when he wasn't and claimed that he fought in World War II in ways that he didn't and basically made a lot of money and got a lot of fame out of telling stories that were faith promoting but not true. George P. Lee was excommunicated. He was a general authority, a Native American general authority.
Video Clip 1 [00:32:48] Richard Lyman was an apostle in the 40s who was excommunicated for adultery. So you know, church leaders are not perfect. They make mistakes, sometimes really big ones. The Mark Hoffman case. We've already talked about how the Brethren were deceived and fooled. And then we could enumerate a decent list of abuses that have happened within the church from not dealing with sexual harassment or sexual abuse appropriately, either stake presidents or bishops or whoever actually performing the abuse or covering it up, etc.
Video Clip 1 [00:33:26] All sorts of baptismal abuses that have happened, including the baseball baptisms of the early 60s in Great Britain, to the soccer baptisms that I experienced on my mission in Guatemala, and ecclesiastical abuses as well. I don't mean to be saying all this, to say the church is bad and ugly and nasty. It's just that you don't really get exposed to this until you start studying in depth. And then once you do, the chasm between what you thought and what actually is is just really wide.
Questions About Church Doctrine and History
Video Clip 1 [00:33:57] Finally, what about church doctrine? Is it the same yesterday, today and forever? Is it straight from God to the prophets? What about the Word of Wisdom? What about the temple ceremony? Well, as I mentioned before, it is quite shocking to hear that on the issue of men becoming gods and vice versa, that President Hinckley would say, I don't know that we teach it. I don't know that we emphasize it on polygamy, say it was not doctrinal to find out that the Word of Wisdom wasn't a commandment until the early 1900s, that many past prophets and apostles drank alcohol and used tobacco, including Brigham Young's son, who was an apostle, that Joseph Smith had a bar in his mansion, drank wine the night before he was murdered.
Video Clip 1 [00:34:42] You know, these are things that we're not told and it's shocking to find them out. And then finally, those of us who went through the temple before 1990 know that there were some, many, there were many disturbing elements of the temple ceremony that were shocking and caused many people to never want to return to the temple after the first time they went. A lot of these things had been removed. And so it begs the question, why is an ordinance that is supposed to be given directly from God changing so dramatically and why were such disturbing things included at all?
Video Clip 1 [00:35:20] So again, I want to just emphasize this very, very strongly. Yes, I've listed a lot of things that are shocking or disturbing about the church to some. But I want to tell you that I have a personal conviction that nothing that I've mentioned today proves that the church is evil or satanic or false.
Video Clip 1 [00:35:39] And many of this stuff does not bother me at all and has very reasonable explanations. So my point isn't to cast stones or dispersions on the church. I'm just trying to get you to think about what your loved one is going through right now.
John Dehlin [00:35:59] And I want you to think about what the gap is between what they were taught, what their understanding was growing up in the church, and then what they've recently discovered. The gap is huge and it's very troubling and disturbing. So how do they feel when they discover all this?
John Dehlin [00:36:18] They feel stunned, they feel betrayed, they feel lied to, they feel like a cover up has been done. They feel disgusted and they feel very angry. They start thinking about all the tithing they paid. They start thinking about all the times they went to the temple, all the proxy work they did. They start thinking about all the sacrifices and all the callings and how much they gave to the church to discover that things were just so dramatically different.
John Dehlin [00:36:52] It's a hard thing to go through something that is very difficult and hopefully is worth a lot of empathy and understanding. Once this happens to you, you never look at Joseph Smith the same way again. You never look at Scripture the same way again. You don't look at the church as you used to in terms of its being infallible. You never think of priesthood authority in the same way.
John Dehlin [00:37:21] You can still respect them, but whether you follow them blindly, it's a totally different matter. And for many people, their entire religious world falls apart. And not only the church comes into question, but Christ comes into question and God himself comes into question.
John Dehlin [00:37:41] People are fundamentally changed relative to the gospel when they experience these historical events, doctrinal issues. And when you are dealing with them, you have to understand that you can't just pull the car to follow the brethren or read your Book of Mormon or do what the brethren say or listen to the Holy Ghost, because their entire worldview has just fallen apart into shambles in many instances.
John Dehlin [00:38:11] So you have to keep that in mind as you are dealing with them, because that's sort of the way it works. Now, how do we as a church tend to deal with these people who have these problems and decide to leave or fall inactive? We fear them.
John Dehlin [00:38:30] It's like they have leprosy and we want to stay away from them. We give them labels that are very unproductive, anti Mormon, ex Mormon, apostate, dangerous, ark steadiers. The labels go on and on and on. We literally cease communication with them.
John Dehlin [00:38:47] We ostracize and distance ourselves from them. And you got to think about this for a second. These people have had their entire religious world fall apart. And in a religion that is supposed to be the one true church, the one that is supposed to follow Christ's teachings, not only do they have to deal with the. The emotional turmoil of having their world fall apart, but they see all these people who are supposed to be Christians, treat them in the least possible Christlike manner. You have to understand that this doesn't just make them sad about the church, it makes them hate the church. It makes them want to go after the church.
John Dehlin [00:39:24] It turns them into some of the most rabid, mean spirited, anti Mormon people you could ever find. Because all of a sudden you Know all the goodness that you would assume or ascribe to God's people all of a sudden vanishes and people are treated inhumanely. What are the results?
John Dehlin [00:39:46] Marriages become challenged and threatened and often divorce happens because the church is put above the family. Families can dissolve. Children no longer have a mother or a father. These people lose, in many instances, especially within Utah, their entire relationships within their community.
John Dehlin [00:40:07] And some people even suffer job loss as a result, which is a travesty as well. We have to ask ourselves as Christians, as members of the Church of Jesus Christ, what did Jesus do when he came up with instances like this? Well, Jesus actually caught a lot of flack for associating with people that weren't mainstream Jews.
John Dehlin [00:40:32] He was railed upon for having dinner with the publicans, for example, when the adulteress was being attacked by all the churchgoers and the religious. He defended her and attacked them. Very interesting. He encouraged us to go after the one and to leave the 99 to go rescue that one person. He taught us to go the extra mile and even carry their backpacks as we go, taught us to turn the other cheek. And most importantly, he just listened and he loved people.
John Dehlin [00:41:07] This is the only credible way to handle these situations. Yet it's the most, for some reason, counterintuitive to the average Mormon and it's the opposite of what they most most often do. So one point I have to stress is we are not treating those who have left the church in a Christlike manner or those who are struggling with the church. We are treating them, in many instances, completely unchristlike. And it is doing damage to us and it is doing incredible damage to them and to the church.
How to Support Those Who Are Leaving
John Dehlin [00:41:44] Now this naturally leads to the question of how to help. And so first I have to offer some things that we should not do. We should not fear these people, we should not judge them, we should not distance ourselves from them or ostracize them. That is the absolute worst thing we can possibly do. And we should certainly not make them a project.
John Dehlin [00:42:11] There's this philosophical notion of I it versus I thou. I it is a relationship where I treat you like a thing, like an object. So instead of a person, you're an it, you're an object. And I have a goal for you. I want to change you in some way. I want to make you into a way that helps me or benefits me or makes me feel better. It's doing your home teaching because it's the end of the month.
John Dehlin [00:42:39] It is reading the scriptures just because you were told to and just Sort of running through them. And most importantly, it is saying to someone who is struggling with the church, I am going to have you as a project and get it so that you are back in the church again. That is an I it objectified relationship.
John Dehlin [00:42:58] In my opinion, more instances than not, it is doomed to failure. The other type of relationship that's worth mentioning is the I thou relationship. And what that says is, I'm a person, you're a person, I respect you deeply, I want what's best for you.
John Dehlin [00:43:16] We are equals. I'm your friend, I love you. Let's go on this journey together and see how we can help each other. And that is the only paradigm that we can take with our brethren who have fallen away, urban excommunication or have left that will ever be effective. We need to decide up front we are going to be their friends no matter what, at any cost, because we love them, genuinely empathize with what they've been through, used to be their friends, and decide that we want to continue being their friends.
John Dehlin [00:43:47] One of the worst things we can ever do is pressure or guilt trip people into coming back because that will backfire. And finally, trying to justify a lot of these historical or doctrinal things and practice what I'll call bad apologetics is disastrous. For example, to talk about Fawn Brody's book and say that she was a lesbian. Or to talk about Michael Quinn and say, oh, he wrote these bad books, but he's gay and so that's why he did it. Or to try and explain away, well, when they said steal in the Book of Mormon, they really meant an amalgam of these different types of men.
John Dehlin [00:44:24] Metals. It's easily biodegradable. There are all sorts of ways that we can perform bad apologetics. Trying to apologize and in many instances explain away these credible issues that make it look like we're hiding something, make it look like we're irrational, make it look like we'll do anything to justify and to explain away something that's credible. I believe that bad apologetics can injure more testimonies than anti Mormon literature.
John Dehlin [00:44:58] In fact, I've heard people say that bad apologetics do more to harm testimonies than anything else within Mormon literature. So these are some things not to do with your loved one who is leaving or has left the church.
John Dehlin [00:45:14] Now, what are some things you can do? The first thing you can do is validate and acknowledge what they've been through. You can say, man, I totally understand. I struggle with those things too. You totally have merit in the things you feel, your feelings are valid. I validate them. You can empathize with them. You can show them unconditional love. You can say to them, I don't care if you ever come back to the church, I want you to know that I will always, always love you and always be your friend. And I embrace you because I respect you and I admire you and I know you're trying to do what's right.
John Dehlin [00:45:50] You can create genuine friendships with these people not that are tied to their church status, but instead are tied to them being human and you being human. Like I mentioned before, you can provide open forums where you listen and you learn and you don't shut off the conversation. You say, what are the things that bug you? And you don't try and explain them all the way. You just listen and say, wow, I understand. You will not believe how impactful it can be to somebody just to have someone else listen to them.
John Dehlin [00:46:20] One thing that we all ought to think about is how we can instigate a broader education of the membership on these historical and cultural issues. Because it's very hard to go to church and hear about Brigham Young's wife when he had 50, or however many he had, or Joseph Smith's wife, or that Joseph Smith turned down alcohol when you knew that he did drink alcohol all throughout his life, and on and on and on. The Book of Mormon is the most correct book in the world when you know that there are a lot of errors. So it's very important that members get up to speed on these issues.
John Dehlin [00:47:00] To say that Joseph was completely innocent when he was put to Carthage jail is not true. He lied about practicing polygamy. He ordered the destruction of a printing press, which is the destruction of private property. Some try to explain that away, but the truth is you cannot say that he was completely innocent. You can't. And so, you know, it's very hard for someone who's struggling to go to church and hear those things.
John Dehlin [00:47:29] In terms of leaders, I've heard of leaders knowing about people who are struggling with their testimony so they find them callings where those callings will be beneficial to the person and to the church. So, for example, let someone be elders, quorum teacher, but say to them, hey, the things that you're not comfortable teaching, we totally support you not teaching them and emphasizing the things that you feel good about, etc. Or Boy Scout calling or whatever calling is edifying to both.
John Dehlin [00:48:01] One of the most important things that we could ever do is provide positive role models. There are hundreds and even Thousands of people on this planet who know all these issues about Mormonism but still retain testimonies or decide to stay in it. And it's very important to match these people up with those people. Now, one thing that's unfortunate is that at some point, the church started feeling uncomfortable with groups like Sunstone and Dialogue and started warning people to stay away from symposia and started excommunicating members of these groups and started telling their employees not to support soundstone or Dialogue anymore. And what this did is it caused many of those people who had done the work to reconcile all these issues with their faith.
John Dehlin [00:48:46] It drove them out of the church or drove them into the underground, and it made them so scared that they don't talk anymore openly about things. And so that's unfortunate that that happened. I can't say that's all the church's fault. I think that some of those organizations shared in the blame for sort of getting a little bit too far off on the edge.
John Dehlin [00:49:06] But providing positive role models can be an essential element to staving off these people's inactivities. And ultimately, we have to just simply respect the free agency of these people and not do it as a threat. Like, okay, you can do what you want, but you better realize the consequences of what you're deciding. That's one of the most disastrous attitudes we can take with these people. We ultimately have to just say, we love you, we accept you unconditionally. We want your happiness.
John Dehlin [00:49:39] If your happiness is leaving the church, then I support you. But if you ever want to stay or come back, I know that I am here to help you. But either way, I love you, I am your friend.
John Dehlin [00:49:50] These are some of the things that I offer as ways to help these people and yourself, frankly. And I would like to end with just a few messages for those who have decided to completely leave the church. And the one point I'll start out with is the. Is perfection or even the lack of major flaws the measure that we should hold up as our affiliation, as our guidelines for affiliation with an organization or with our relationships with other people?
Keeping Perspective and Moving Forward
John Dehlin [00:50:31] And what I mean by that is, let's say you leave the Mormon Church tomorrow. Are you going to find a better church, really? A church that doesn't have issues that are just as significant or even more significant? And it's not just with church.
John Dehlin [00:50:47] Can you name a government here in the world that doesn't have major flaws or weaknesses? Does that mean we should all renounce our citizenships globally? Can you name a business that doesn't have ethical problems or violations yet, are we still willing to work for those businesses? And you can even take it to marriages or families. Perfection is just pretty darn hard to find in this world. And even lack of serious flaws is quite hard to find. And so if we're to hold up this expectation that, that we're only going to affiliate ourselves or remain members to something that lacks major flaws, will we become an island?
John Dehlin [00:51:29] Will we become devoid of any relationships or affiliations? You know, something to think about. Also philosophically, this is something Levi Peterson told me once. Do we ever have an obligation when we're in an organization that is struggling or has problems?
John Dehlin [00:51:52] Do we ever have an obligation ethically instead of just abandoning it to stick around and make it better? I tend to think that we do. And most importantly, there are many people in this church that are struggling with the same issues that we're having.
John Dehlin [00:52:11] Suffering in silence, not able to leave, but not feeling good about staying either. And these people frankly need help, need friends, need role models as well. And to just pack up and leave is in many ways to leave these people in a very miserable, sad state.
John Dehlin [00:52:32] I want you to know that there are many people who know all of these issues, don't explain them away using bad apologetics, but instead remain faithful. And so that doesn't mean that you should sort of follow the Joneses, but you should know that there are many people who know more than you do, but have decided that it's good and right to stay. And it's just something to keep in mind. Another thing that I'll add is our church in modern times puts an unhealthy emphasis on things being true. True means absolutely of God and the one true and the only true.
John Dehlin [00:53:16] I would consider that there is nothing wrong with not thinking about true meaning it is better than everyone else or the only one sanctioned by God. If you are uncomfortable with that terminology, there is nothing wrong with just saying is the church good? Is it a net positive? Is it a net positive in your life?
John Dehlin [00:53:39] And instead of asking what is true and ordained of God? Because what is the one true government? What is the one true business, the one true marriage, the one true religion? You may have a hard time if you are expecting some type of God directly involved, semi flawless organization.
John Dehlin [00:53:59] What if you just set your standard for what's good? What's going to be a positive influence in your life? What's going to be good for you and your family? What's going to bring you and your loved ones the most joy that's a standard that I think is worth considering.
John Dehlin [00:54:15] Another instance that is important to me I don't look to the church as a place to be fulfilled all the time and to get all my needs met. Often times I do have many important needs met and I am served by my fellow church members, but I look at the church as an incredible place to serve other people.
John Dehlin [00:54:36] Where else am I going to get to know my neighbors in my community in a way that otherwise I would somewhat tend to be isolated and just keep to myself within my own home? The church is an incredible place to find out who is having a baby and needs a meal, who is sick and needs to be comforted, what service projects are available, how to help other people in a disaster, how to just get to know struggling youth, etc. And who knows, someday you may even be helped in a time of desperate need by the same community that you've developed. And I acknowledge that there are plenty of ways to serve outside of the church, but I found the church to be a dang good place.
John Dehlin [00:55:19] Finally, probably the last point that I want to just leave with you is that there is nothing wrong with deciding that you can be a Mormon on your own terms. And what I mean by that is some of the commandments and some of the beliefs and some of the doctrines you follow wholeheartedly and other things you just say, that is not for me, I am not going to follow that, or I am going to follow that in a moderated way, or take my own spin on that doctrine or teaching or commandment or expectation.
John Dehlin [00:55:47] Because in reality, every single Mormon at their core ends up being a Mormon on their own terms. Whether it is by commission or omission, none of us follows all the teachings of the Church and all the commandments of the church perfectly. So since none of us reaches perfection, maybe there's nothing wrong with us just admitting that none of us are perfect and that we're going to go ahead and follow the things that we can or feel good about and leave some other things behind that we don't.
John Dehlin [00:56:21] So that's sort of my presentation today. I hope you've found it helpful. For those of you who have loved ones who are leaving or have left the church, I encourage you just to love them and to try and follow some of these ideas and tactics when you are dealing with them. And for those of you who are struggling with the church and wondering whether you want to leave or if you have left, I want to sort of follow my own advice and just tell you, seek for happiness, seek for joy, but make sure that you don't follow after paths of greater sadness and unhappiness.
John Dehlin [00:57:00] Find ways to serve others, because that sort of becomes that's sort of what this life is all about, is finding ways to help and serve other people and to find love and joy within your personal relationships, your family relationships, and your community relationships. So I thank you for taking your time to listen. Please feel free to email me at MormonStories, or come up to my blog site or whatever@mormonstories.org and please let me know your thoughts and feelings.
John Dehlin [00:57:36] This is the first draft of this presentation, so if there are inaccuracies or advice you have for how to make it better, I'd love to find out about it. But all in all, I wish all of you joy and happiness and meaning and fulfillment in your life. And I thank you for.
Transcript © 2026 John P. Dehlin. All rights reserved. Brief quotations are welcome with attribution and a link to mormonstories.org; all other use requires written permission.
Part 1
41 Responses
Succinctly, it is all about being illusioned with something that is not real or true. Too often every member’s view or testimony is based on something like Paul Dunn’s stories.
Bet you a couple donuts more members have read the ‘Work and the Glory’ than any other book or set of books in the last number of years. Mormons are lazy as to their own history, intellectually sloppy in many cases and their only connection is really one of a cultural sort. There is a lack of the real work on a personal basis. Did not Bushman write one of the main reasons for his ‘Rough Stone Rolling’ was to educate those poor unstudied BYU graduates who come east and then flounder when faced with a little liberal philosophy and criticism?
J. Reuben Clark observed sixty years ago we were as a church intellectually lazy nothing has changed.
When a “tough” article, program or whatever including a snub from their bishop or file leader then they become disillusioned.
I, like you, have seen many come and go including friends and family members.
No one ever said it was supposed to be easy, but the responsibility is really ours. We won’t find it in attending Church each week either. Pres Lee’s correlation program and Brother Packer’s supervision have assured us we will only ever read the ‘for the faithful’ versions of our own history.
My great grandmother was Josephine Rosetta Lyon Fisher, supposed daughter of Jos. Smith. Her mother was Sylivia Porter Session Lyon and was simultaneously married, polyandry to those unfamiliar with the term, to three men including the Prophet. She was part of the second anointed group in Nauvoo. None of that bothers me in the slightest and does not prevent me from teaching my Deacons each week or twice a week filling shifts at the Bountiful Temple as an ordinance worker. Neither did it or anything else keep me from serving as a bishop in my ward for 5 1/2 years before, out of boredom, my wife and I let for a Spanish Branch where we are learning the language and loving those who are los hijos de Lehi y Dios.
So much for my ramblings. May you and yours prosper in ’08.
Hi, my great grandmother was Josephine Rosetta Lyon Fisher, through Irvin Fisher, her son too. I discovered that one day while doing my family history. Not because of that solely, but I have left the church since then. But I still love studying and meeting old ‘cousins’.
“None of that bothers me in the slightest ”
Perhaps it should.
Or perhaps it shouldn’t. People are bothered by all sorts of different things so no need to hold one group or opinion’s view as to what they should or shouldn’t be bother about over another groups. So “Equality” is bothered by polygamy, and “WP” isn’t. It would be interesting to see what bothers people another 140+ years from now (using that figure since polygamy was outlawed in Utah in 1890 so giving a similar timeframe).
A December 2020 Pew Research report shows 2% of the world lives in polygamous situations. And while many don’t agree with it the whole conversation about “love is love” and letting people choose their own partner is changing how people think about polygamy past and present, “self-described liberals are much more likely than conservatives to see polygamy as morally acceptable (34% vs. 9%)” (Pew Research, 2020). Either way, people get to decide what they want to do. Nowadays it is all about, I do me and you do you.
April 26th, 2007.
And I read absolutely everything ever written that had the seal of the First Presidency and Quorom of the 12 published in my lifetime.
After that I had to go back and look at a lot of stuff that had a whole new light after that.
You are correct that many people leave the Church because they hear the stuff that you mention in your presentation. The problem is that a lot of the stuff in your presentation is half truths or even complete un truths.
For example, you state there is no geographic evidence whatsoever of the Book of Mormon, that there is no evidence of horses, etc. – but there are volumes of evidence that have been published (and you know it!).
You say repeatedly that “you can’t explain away” a lot of things you mention. But the half truths you mention certainly *do* have an explanation when the other half of the story is known. For example, you say there are thousands of errors in the Book of Mormon that were corrected. Well, there were a number of corrections, but most were punctuation changes and simple text changes that were introduced when the original manuscript was copied by hand. Many of the changes were actually bringing the text back to what it originally was in the original manuscript (vs the printer’s copy where errors were introduced). Many of the other changes were adding chapters and verses. So maybe you call that “explaining away” the “errors,” but I call it gaining a more full understanding of the issue and realizing it’s a non-issue.
People who believe at face value the one-sided explanation of the issues in your presentation are the same type of people who would have believed that Jesus Christ himself was not the Messiah because he was from Nazareth (instead of Bethlehem). Wiser people dig deeper and try to find out the full truth and *all* the facts.
Believe it or not, God also allows leaders of the Church (like Peter) to make mistakes. We have to take those mistakes in context and determine whether those mistakes and thoses weaknesses of men/women undermine the Gospel itself. Should I not believe in Peter’s calling as an Apostle or a prophet because he denied the Lord three times?
The bottom line is that God himself knows whether the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is what it claims to be — the Restoration of the original Church established by the Savior Himself to prepare the way before the Second Coming. That’s an awesome claim, but God will tell anyone the answer if they sincerely ask.
There *are* millions (and growing) who have received an answer from God that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the Lord’s restored Church through an unmistakable manifestation (and ongoing manifestations) from the Holy Spirit. The profound peace, joy and strength that comes from living the principles of the Restored Gospel are also witnesses that The Restoration was and is real — truly real, despite any challenges or weaknesses of men and women who played a part in its restoration.
Not all the people who leave the Church do so because they’ve stopped believing it. I would say the majority leave or become “inactive” because they decide they don’t want to (or can’t get themselves to) live the principles and high standards of the Church. (When someone stops following a diet, does that necessarily mean the diet is not true?)
Many of those who “leave” the Church actually still believe the Church is true because they have had a witness from the Holy Ghost that they can’t forget or deny. When they were living the Gospel, they also experienced firsthand the peace, happiness, and spiritual strength.
Adam,
Based on your logic, truth comes from God – and the Holy Spirit provides the ultimate answer to truth. To carry this further – the Holy Spirit has born witness to me that the Church is not true – or at least true in the sense that you want it to be.
The problem with a faith based completely upon the evidence of the Holy Spirit (or evidence at all) is that you have to keep explaining why some things do not match. The suicide bombers must have had quite the powerful experience from God to do such horrible things. The Pentecostals are powerfully moved by the Spirit, and Mormon’s are confident their witness is the true and authentic voice of God.
Sadly, you are at a point where discussion is pointless and without basis. I once believed as you do and came up with plausible answers to questions facing the church. But, just like those apologists who focused on a geocentric universe, at some point the body of evidence becomes too strong.
It was comfortable knowing everything and is stressful knowing little. But, regardless of your claim, I have never been so happy. You might be telling yourself: “wickedness never was happiness” but that is far too simplistic of our mortal existence.
I am honestly trying to reconcile my faith, even though I cannot even espouse the existence of God. I’m trying to understand how to have faith, but not faith based on evidence. Faith that is based on evidence will ultimately fail. I define myself as atheist by intellect, agnostic by philosophy, Mormon by tradition, and morally guided by the golden rule. I attend Church every week and hold a calling, but I cannot believe in God.
Illuminate me if you will how to have authentic faith? Alma 32 will work for any denomination or religious tradition. I’m positive that if you focused with all you energy and prayed to know if the Koran or Upanishads are true you would get an answer similar to any you have how that the Book of Mormon is true.
How do you believe without evidence?
Adam,
Please provide for all of us some references to the “volumes of evidence” supporting BoM archeology that have been published and that John is so knowledgeable of. I would ask that your sources be from a non-LDS scholars with some peer review process employed.
I’m making an honest request, the studying I’ve done has produced volumes of evidence but not in the direction you seem to be alluding to. If indeed John’s presentation is full of half truths, as you’ve stated, I would expect you to be able to back that up with more than just your opinion or the opinions of other faithful LDS scholars with obvious reasons to have a bias.
Equality,
I normally really enjoy your input, but your “should” comment is confusing. Is WP (or anyone for that matter) supposed to adopt your opinions or feelings?
Just wondering (sincerely). I suppose I hold more intellectually-minded people to a higher standard, i.e. to not impose their values on others, something that the word “should” does.
Maybe I’m just getting defensive. : ) I just appreciate it when we are all allowed to feel how we want to (in this case about the church).
And a note in general–I used to go by “adam” but that seems to be a common name (duh).
The Book of Mormon archeology debate is really quite boring. From an orthodox point of view, you are “supposed to” know its true from the witness of the Spirit, not from science. From a liberal point of view, as a piece of literature it can still have immense value.
In my opinion the presentation does not really even point out the hardest issues, and it is a couple years old anyway. I know John has evolved a bit in his understanding, and I think he even articulated some harder issues in his essay on how to stay in the church.
The apologetic approach often criticizes a critic for taking a quote or passage of something out of context. However, I think they also take those contextual situations out of context of the whole body of evidence on an issue. Maybe on a particular aspect of Joseph Smith it is up to interpretation and can be fairly viewed either way. Perhaps when accompanied by the good feelings of the Holy Ghost it sways the interpretation towards the positive. However, when you go through and start to add up the many things that require this kind of evaluation, and combine those “explainable” things with the things that are not explainable and invoke the “leaders are allowed to be human” response, the whole thing become really hard to handle anymore.
Its really hard to approach this reasonably from the inside. Your whole world revolves around the truth claims. Your family, all the time and energy both temporally and spiritually that you have given. It is a lot to lose. For many people it is an investment as deep as your marriage, and the idea of that partner not being what you thought is paralyzing. These are the motivations for both the apologist AND the one who leaves. The apologist fights hard, sometimes even with verbal violence, because they don’t want to lose the virtue of that “spouse”. The one who leaves feels like the virtue is gone and they have been betrayed just like if their spouse lied and cheated and lured them into the marriage based on an incorrect image.
Keep in mind that the point of the presentation is not to convince anyone that the church is guilty of crimes against those that leave. Just to make you understand how those people feel so you can find empathy and treat them with tolerance and love.
It often seems like critics of the Church are those expect Church leaders to be infallible and doctrine never to change. Many Latter-day Saints’ beliefs are more flexible than that, taking into account that Church leaders are still human with myriad weaknesses, shortcomings, and prejudices, and that Church policy is not always Revelation as found in D&C 138. Even Latter-day Saints who maintain such a flexible (and thus healthy) view toward their faith, however, often tend to be too inflexible when it comes to Church culture or non-doctrinal traditions, ways of doing things, methods, or processes in the Church(e.g. white shirts, beards, suits, corporate culture, to name a few). Treating the Church as a corporation can be more damaging to people’s faith than what critics claim are irrefutable historical conclusions about early leaders and/or policies. All Latter-day Saints can do better to make the Church a truly receptive environment for people suffering physically and in spirit, and for people to examine the depths of their souls and expand on them in a comfortable and supportive environment, which should include open discussion of doctrines and policies. Much of this does occur in the Church, much to the contradiction of what many critics would have everyone believe. But in many cases an environment develops that is less conducive to such soul-searching and development when people become too attached to essentially meaningless cultural traits that have accumulated in the Church.
True stuff. Thanks, JohnF.
#7,
In my defense, I did say “perhaps.” I was simply expressing the idea that to not be bothered at all by polyandry in the early church is a bit odd, and might be a position worthy of further reflection. “Perhaps it should” was a pithy way to express that idea. I do not mean to suggest that everyone is obligated to be bothered by polyandry. It does seem odd to me, though, that someone in today’s world would NOT be bothered by polyandry, in the same way that it would be odd to me if someone said “my great great grandfather owned several slaves but it doesn’t bother me in the least.”
Equality-
Thanks for explaining that–maybe the key here is what “bothered” means. Is it enough to cause someone to leave the church?
A lot of things related to the church bother me (mostly historical, some current). All the negatives don’t compare to the amount of positives I’ve received from my membership. I do realize that for many that is not the case, however.
As an aside–polyandry doesn’t bother me any more than polygyny does. They both bother me. : )
Good point, shenpa. I am not saying it should bother someone to the point that they leave the church over it. My heck, I haven’t even left the church yet, and I’m bothered by a lot more than polygyny and polyandry. I don’t know that there is any one thing or combination of things that “should” bother someone enough to leave. I think the threshold is an intensely personal one and wouldn’t presume to try to make that decision for anyone but myself. In that way, I agree with John Dehlin that there are ways of dealing with the negative, bothersome stuff and stay in the church. I don’t have an agenda to get anyone to leave the church. I do think it would be healthy for members of the church to grapple with the difficult issues rather than dismiss them blithely as non-bothersome. And I think the church would be a better place if both leaders and lay members did more of that–more of the kind of stuff that goes on here at Mormon Stories and around the Mormon blogosphere.
Not a good comparison Equality between slavery and my polyandrous great grandmother. Slavery implies lack of agency whereas Sylvia P. Sessions Lyon had a choice, she had three choices. She was very close to the Prophet, likely intimate even. The reason it does not bother me as Shenpa pointed out there are just too many positives, the many spiritual dividends in my life tat result from full activity. Further, I assure you I have grappled and struggled with many issues of faith over the decades of my life. I am very much at peace with Church history and my family’s history.
I think D. Michael Quinn, the “DNA Mormon”, and likely the best living Mormon historian, is an example for anyone who has studied history and remains a believer. Maybe it is in my genes…
Devin, please consider what faith is and how belief works…
You ask, “How do you believe without evidence?” Is not faith an evidence of things NOT seen? Does that not imply there is not to be evidence?
Reinhold Neighbur suggested as Christian believers we must have a subjective experience and a positive one. It is very subjective.
WP,
Thank you – I agree that faith has to be subjective, but whose faith really is subjective in their minds?
It is challenging for me to distinguish faith from evidence given the fact that our theology has the concept of evidence as the basis for belief. The Book of Mormon is supposed to be evidence that the Bible is true. If you don’t believe me that evidence is connected to our faith, consider an article from the Ensign this month which goes through all the wonderful evidences pointing to the existence of God (Our God Truly Is God By Elder Douglas L. Callister Of the Seventy). Callister even misquotes Darwin asserting that Darwin believed that the eye could not been formed through natural selection when he was really showing that this complex organ can also be accounted for.
I think there is something out there called faith, which is reasonable and yet exists without knowledge or evidence. People continue to believe in the face of evidence, but often times I see them supplanting the evidence from the spirit or their personal relationship with the divine as trumping evidence that comes naturally to humanity. Spiritual evidence bothers me because George W. Bush, Osama bin Laden, the Pope, the Prophet, the Evangelicals, etc. etc. etc. all claim spiritual evidence to justify their actions and beliefs and then condemn the other as being led by the evil one. (Even allowing for other faiths to have a portion of God’s spirit condemns them because a portion in not complete, which seems to be a requirement for salvation.)
I just don’t think God cares about the truth. If God cared about the truth and really wanted us to have it, he/she/it would do something about it. In my opinion, at the moment, if there is a God, and we are biologically designed to believe (as some would suggest), then the point in belief is not correct behaviour or doctrine but the very fact to think about God, which in hand will cause us to think about our behaviour towards others and how it affects them. So, do I have faith? I don’t know. But, my wager is to do good as far as I understand, which means at times rejecting the dogma of religion and taking the chance that my good will be perceived wrongly both now and in the future.
I am very content Devin with the notion that God loves us each to a degree we cannot fathom or understand. We must however temper our interpretation of life and juxtapose this love with the immutable law of agency. A Buddhist once told me there are as many paths to the top of Fujisan or Mt. Fuji as there are schools or ways of seeking enlightenment. Too often we as sectarian M’s and Christians want to narrowly define who the elect, or the Saints. We do error in this, I believe, as we vainly attempt to circumscribe God’s love for Mitt bashing Mike Huckabee, atheists, evangelicals, even Jihadist Muslims among others.
God is truth. We just, however, as Paul observed “see through a glass darkly.” Just so much we do not know! Consider in another vein Devin that only something like 4% of the universe in visible or detectable. The rest is dark matter and dark energy. One could argue the disciples of science, astrophysicists, including Stephen Hawking because they have not adequately presented to us clearly the matter of things we should therefore reject science to some degree. There is not unified field theory. Einstein failed, even on his deathbed he vainly tried to complete his life’s work.
I think it was Lord Rutherford who asked, “Can you teach physics to a pig?” Are we limited in areas of both science and religion in understanding the hard questions, some of which you raise regarding faith? There were not a lot of things I never agreed with Elder McConkie over except when he said we have all that we need to know to achieve salvation and exaltation. I accept that. Perhaps aspects of religion, mine included, are as advanced as a college course in physics and maybe I am but a simple pig luxuriating in the cool mud of Mormon theology during this hot season we call mortal life.
A careful review of our history (Mormondom) assures any honest student that it is filled with contradictions, paradoxes, conundrums and contradictions, even our leaders having warts and flaws. J. Reuben Clark spoke about a sixth sense, one of faith, that kept his intellect in line with his faith or the limitations to it. Likewise a review of conference addresses by the Brethren suggests there are contradictions as well. Strong personalities waged and moved the lines and trenches over the decades regarding issues of science. Largely, the winners were those who outlived their adversaries, i.e. Jos. Fielding Smith and his son in law versus Roberts and Talmage among others.
In conclusion Devin this is a grand adventure or luxury of discovery for many of us who have the time to ponder the imponderables. We have the time to do so because we do not have to scratch out our meager existence in some draught plagued hard pan somewhere in a third world country. Enjoy the process and continue your efforts.
Adam F:
You are practicing bad apologetics as outlined in the presentation. You might want to reveiw your facts again.
To john F.:
Hear, hear! Very perceptive and germane.
John’s presentation addresses the issues faced by once believing Latter-day Saints, who come to believe that Mormonism is based on fallacy. “Ex-Mormon”, or some variation of it, are how they common refer to themselves.
I’m a little confused by the slide and discussion at the beginning, explaining that 2/3rds of those on the rolls of the church do not in any way participate in the church. In my experience, Ex-Mormons make up a small minority within this 2/3rd. The vast majority fall within two groups:
-People raised in Mormon families, baptized at 8, but as adults do not consider themselves Mormons. If anything is drawing people out of the church in droves, it is the allure of the secular lifestyle currently embraced by most Americans and Europeans.
-Those who have no dispute with beliefs of the church, but who do not feel that the meetings have enough benefit to them personally to make it worth the effort to attend.
I’m not trying to say that the Ex-Mormon is insignificant. The worth of every soul is great. But I think that the presentation could easily lead people outside of the church to believe that the number of people renouncing Mormonism (whether publicly and officially, or in a private and personal way) is much greater than it actually is: a blip here and there, to borrow a phrase.
John explains that becoming an Ex-Mormon is the result of some seminal event in the person’s life. I agree with this statement, but I completely disagree that this event is learning of some disturbing piece of information.
Whenever I have known someone who was happy in the church, but “had their testimony shaken”, they invariably come up with some rationalization. “Bad apologetics”, as John calls it, provides reassurance to many Mormons in a crisis of faith.
For those who I have seen leave, a breaking point leads to no longer wanting to be a Mormon. Feeling abused by a Bishop (often with legitimate cause) is the most common issue. That person who had previously run away from people passing out anti-Mormon literature will head immediately to the local Evangelical Christian bookstore, and soon thereafter will be regularly posting angry rants on “Recovery From Mormonism” internet forums.
Our best response is to leave our door open. When we repeatedly knock on theirs, they feel we are trying to badger them into staying. Disciplinary council action, regardless of the person’s new lifestyle, will only burn their bridge back to fellowship.
Gary,
Are you the Gary Moore from San Jose who was on Rich Anderson’s BBS? Or are you channeling the late game show host? Or neither.
And some people just leave the church because been a good mormon is hard work.
“And some people just leave the church because been a good mormon is hard work.”
I suppose that is possible. I think Ted Lyon made a similar comment about the Chilean saints in his podcast. But this idea does not comport with my experience. In the last two years, I have met in real life and had online discussions with hundreds of disaffected and post-Mormons. I have yet to encounter one who became disaffected or left the LDS church because being “a good mormon is hard work.” Perhaps the folks of whom you speak are just so lazy that even getting on the Internet and participating in blog and message board discussions is simply too difficult, so they are not represented in the sample of people with whom I have been associating.
It is frustrating for me to see comments like the ones made here by jayspec, john f., and Gary Moore. One of my purposes in blogging and participating in discussions online about Mormonism is to help foster understanding between devout Mormons and those who have become disaffected or left the LDS church altogether. I would really like the devout Mormons to understand that the myths that are perpetuated in quorum meetings, Sunday School, Relief Society, in PECs and Ward Councils, and yes, even at General Conference concerning the disaffected are just that–myths.
There are many reasons people become disaffected, stop going to church, and/or resign their membership. The idea that people leave because “being a Mormon is too hard” or “the Bishop offended them” or “they committed adultery and just want to justify their sins” or “they were hoodwinked by anti-Mormon material from bitter apostates and/or evangelicals” is so far from the mark for the people I know and associate with in the Disaffected Mormon Underground (DAMU) as to be something of a running joke among us.
As long as believing Mormons refuse to acknowledge the real reasons people become disaffected and leave the church, they will continue to be unsuccessful in ministering to them and all parties will suffer, in my opinion. It is surprising and a bit disappointing to me that people who have watched this presentation, listened to the podcasts here, and spent a substantial amount of time in the Mormon blogosphere (both DAMU and Bloggernacle) continue to express the tired cliches from the correlated curriculum concerning so-called apostates.
In the interest of constructive dialogue, I will admit that I have at times witnessed a similar tendency on the part of some ex-mos in refusing to accept what faithful members say about the reasons they continue to believe in the church. I have seen exmos say things like “oh, the Mormons SAY they are happy, but they really can’t be” or “those guys can’t REALLY believe–they are just faking their belief–they MUST be able to see through the deception”; etc. If we can’t believe what we say to each other about why we believe or why we leave, there can be no real communication. If someone says she believes because of x, y, and z, we should deal with x, y, and z and not argue that they really believe because of a, b, and c. Likewise, if someone says he does not believe because of d, e, and f, the faithful ought not argue that he really doesn’t believe because of u, v, and w.
Jay,
I would say that rather than actually renounce Mormonism, such people usually fall within the second group I mentioned.
I’m from the Bay Area, but not San Jose. I was active in LDS related BBS discussion forums in the 1980’s, particularly the Fidonet Mormon Echo. Now that’s going way back!
Gary,
Yes, I would agree with that. I should have said stop participating rather than leave.
Welcome back, you actually remembered the real name of the mail list. I am impressed. We are no longer in the Bay Area but are in Colorado.
I just watched the presentation, I am one of the X-Mormons that are described and yes John I became that way as a direct result of deeper study that was intended to make me a better teacher.
I must say that I reacted with a strange sense of De Ja Vou at Adams commentary….It could have come word for word from mouths my “friends” “Leaders” “Mentors” and even relatives almost 30 years ago.
In many ways you do not loose your faith, that can remain as strong as ever but it becomes almost impossible to do with the confines of the Tribe due to the never ending attacks by the Adams of the Church. I can tell you from personal voyage that there is no shortage of Adams in any organized church, they are all too common.
Thanks for doing te presentation your words are encouraging.
I guess I don’t understand how someone can become acquainted with all of these misrepresentations and still feel OK with the church. I was raised by very strict parents to literally believe all of these things and my entire reality was based on these things being true.
Now that this has been shattered for me, I’m dealing with a lot of hurt and anger and frustration about the ongoing denial of the truth. Since faith is supposed to be placed in something that is true but unseen, it cannot help a situation when you are asked to have faith in something that is a lie.
Devin,
There is something that bothers me about the statement in which you say that the Spirit told you that the church is not true. I beleive that God does not lie. Why would he tell some that it is true and some that it is not? I beleive that he doesn’t. I have thought abou this alot. I am a convert and have journeyed through many other faiths. I believe that truth does not change and that if the gospel was not true, that in my very sincere search I would have felt that. Why would God lie to me? I don’t think he did or does.
I also find it interesting that John talks mainly about the church and its problems,the church is not about people and things, it is about God and his teachings. If you stake your faith in the people and the history and whether or not the plates were burried in a stump or a hole, you will never know if the gospel is true or not.
Just watched the presentation on youtube. Good stuff. My girlfriend and I watched together and both found the presentation fair and balanced. O’reilly couldn’t have done it better (but no really im being serious, O’reilly aside).
One difference between my story and the story outlined by the person who made the video (whose name i don’t know – is it the John posting here?) is that I first became an atheist and then was forced to accept that the church was not true (given that god doesn’t exist) despite my emotional desire for it to be true. I guess you would say that the seminal event in my life was asking the question for the first time in my life “what if God doesn’t exist?” and realizing that everything made more sense that way. This question was raised based on my studies of the factual findings in fields of geology and evolutionary biology, cosmology, etc.
The main reason i didn’t stay with the church even though it could have potentially been “good” despite not being “true” was that I fell in love with a girl who was raised in a similarly exclusivist religion, that of Independent Fundamentalist Baptist, and together we realized that both our congregations were equally being effected by the spirit but both could not be true. This led me to consider that this “positive effect” of religion could be purely psychological. I went on to research that and found the arguments convincing (start with Daniel Dennet, “Breaking the spell: religion as a natural phenomenon”).
It was only after all of this, when i was a self-confirmed atheist, that i realized i still “NEW the church HAD to be true.” I didn’t doubt that this was because i was raised knowing it was true but nonetheless i still “knew” it. to get rid of the cognitive dissonance I finally actually researched the history of the church. So, after becoming an atheist, I still experienced the feelings of loss and fear and anger and despair at realizing that what i had been taught was different than what had been true about the church. (I was an atheist and still thought Joseph smith had one wife, etc – literally hadn’t heard a single bit of what was in this demonstration). I think that illustrates the extent to which such realizations can devastate a believer. It would have been much much worse if I was dating or married to a mormon and still actually going to church and stuff.
Anyway, loved the presentation.
I find your way of speaking about people who are struggling with the church very intuitive. For a long time I have gone back and forth torturing myself for having problems with the teachings. This all happened the same way that you described in the video, and I searched out answers to confusing questions. When I found no one talking about them but anti-mormons that made it worse. I have never been able to say that I have lost all of my faith, but I was afraid to tell Anyone I knew that I had a problem. I felt like, and still do feel like, it is an all or nothing situation. I have become depressed when I never ever was before because I felt like if I didn’t try to do everything right I would be doomed to a lesser level of glory, and that scared me. I wish more people, especially the ones that I know and love personally, would understand where I am coming from the way that you do. It is an extreme feeling of relief.
I don’t know what my future in the church will be… I go through cycles of convincing myself to ignore the problems and focus on the good, only to have those problems come up again and not be addressed by members. Every time I feel this way I go into serious depression of what my family would think, and them what my ‘eternal’ future will be. I hate that I deal with this, but it is good to know that I am not the only one who finds them self in the gap between having problems with the church, but not wanting to just leave because of them.
I’m active, mid-twenties, return missionary, married in the temple. I love my ward, I love my bishop, my elders quorum is great, calling is rewarding, etc. I have no problems with anyone in the church, the commandments, etc. All my family and in-laws are active, temple attending, bishopric, high-council, primary and relief society presidents, etc. I would have so much to lose and so little to gain from leaving the church. I say ‘would’ because I have been struggling lately with new information I have come across that seems to change everything I’ve previously believed, but I don’t know what I’m going to do about it yet. This presentation shows exactly what I’m going through. When I say exactly I mean like dead on accurate, a lot of you people on here clearly haven’t read and haven’t done the research or you would know what I’m talking about. Obviously there are a million nit-picky things you could criticize the church over, but in the end none of those matter if the major points of the church are correct. I have never been one who criticizes or looks for fault in the church, I’ve always loved church history, including my own family history, and that genuine desire to learn more about the church, in a faith promoting way, is what led me to a few startling discoveries.
By far the biggest shocker has been learning about the book of abraham and the papyrus. I was literally sick to my stomach for days after I read several websites and confirmed what they were saying. I can accept any doctrine, revised history, personal flaws of church leaders, polygamy, and on and on. I don’t care about that. I’m not trying to understand the mysteries of the universe here. I know there are a lot of things Joseph did and said that I will never understand, but that isn’t a problem for me. What Joseph said about the book of abraham though was very plain and clear, but there is extremely persuasive evidence to show that it is something entirely different. The papyrus is actually fairly typical funeral documents that were included with the mummies because they would have been found with the mummies. Joseph filled in the blanks in the papyrus (talking specifically about facsimilies 1 and 2) where it was damaged and then gave a meaning for it, and abraham in the first person refers to the pictures. It seems as clear as day to anyone looking at this evidence that Joseph’s explanation of the documents, their source, their meaning, etc. was clearly wrong. Egyptologists now have the ability to read the papyrus easily. Google hydrocephalus and read about what that means if you doubt what I’m saying.
I’m shocked and confused. I don’t know what I’m going to do. I feel like my testimony is coming down like a house of cards. I don’t know how to bring this up to my wife. I know I’m going to have to deal with this somehow, but I haven’t decided how yet. I can’t stop thinking about this and I feel horrible. I would have been perfectly happy never knowing this stuff, but now that I do how can I go back? I know I have an obligation to be honest to myself, that is putting me in a difficult position. The church has been such an integral part of my life for so long, there is so much good in it, but if Joseph Smith wasn’t what he said he was, and if every prophet since him has relied on, quoted, and used a book of scripture that was fabricated how can I go on in the church?
BTW the statement about bad apologetics making things worse is 100% true. When someone points out things like the book of abraham above, then FARMS or Hugh Nibley or whoever gives multiple different possible explanations, none of which actually get to the main problem and all of which are really weak, it really hurts their own credibility. Failure to acknowledge problems that are glaring, and trying to explain them away with half-responses has made things worse for me. I honestly don’t know how the church should respond to the book of abraham stuff, other than being completely open about it.
Devin: You say, ” I define myself as atheist by intellect, agnostic by philosophy, Mormon by tradition, and morally guided by the golden rule. ” This really hit home with me. It is identical to how I have come to feel after leaving the church. My curiosity lies in your staement, “I attend Church every week and hold a calling, but I cannot believe in God.” Why do you attend a Church that teaches doctrine that is contrary to how you define yourself? and How does the church allow you to hold a calling when the very matter that is espoused to be taught is again contary to what you believe?
Thank you for posting this. I have been having struggles in the church and with my own perspective on the church. I have always had problems explaining how I feel, but you showed how I feel in this presentation. Thank you for posting this.
I was born into the Mormon church and was a faithful member for nearly 18 years. Then I read an article about cult tactics in mind control. It talked about particular tactics that are even used by the CIA because they are so effective. I instantly realized the correlation between these tactics and Mormon practices. Basically, the article explained, that by tying and emotion to anything or any idea or philosophy, you will solidify that idea or philosophy with the person as being bad or good depending on which emotion you are trying to tie to it. For example, you watch a movie that stirs up a very compassionate and loving warm emotions such as a family with a child who’s dying with an illness, and everyone is horrified and sad Up Until the End, we’re through praying and faithfulness in the church, the child is saved and those on to live a happy life. the church basically pushed the idea that every time I had a peaceful, warm, or loving feeling in my heart, that that was the spirit assuring me that the church was true. They do this in every teaching opportunity and they do it all the time. For 18 years I tied every good, warm, loving, positive feeling into the faith of my church. So to deny my faith in the church would be, to me, not much different from denying good feelings all together. And being that all of this brainwashing as I call it, was done to me during my Foundation years, (infancy to adult), they are virtually Unbreakable and will always be with me to a certain extent. This is what has turned me off about the Mormon church. This tactic of tying and emotion to your face is not something I think should be necessary if your church is really true like you claim it is. Why you CIA tactics when you’ve got a true gospel? And why try to control people and force them into believing something by threatening to Desert them abandon them label them etcetera? As far as I’m concerned, the church has far too many secrets and chooses to avoid addressing most of its more controversial issues. This doesn’t sit well with me. I don’t expect any religion to be perfect. But when you start forcing your will on others in these covert, downright evil, ways, I have a big problem with that. Like I said, I was brainwashed since infancy. So my faith in this church will never completely subside as a result. To deny my faith in the church would be the same to me as denying my beliefs in feeling good things. Logically speaking, however, it angers me to realize the Insidious control that this organization attempted to have over me since the day I was born. Just my thoughts. Please don’t come back at me with attacks. It’s not easy to leave the Mormon church, but what’s harder, is coming to the realization that everything you thought you knew may have been a lie. It’s a very very difficult process to go through, and it takes a very brave person to challenge every believe they’ve ever had knowing the risk that they are taking, could tear it all down. I respect the members of the Mormon church. I don’t believe they are bad people. I believe they are actually very good people, and have nothing but love for all of them. Even the ones practicing the techniques I described above are very well intentioned I am sure. They were indoctrinated the same way I was and millions are. They believe what they’re doing is correct, and they rightly have not yet question their faith because of enormity of what they would risk. I feel like once the ball started rolling for me in finding out the truth, if I could have stopped it I probably would have. But I was unable to stop it, which is the only reason I think I came into the light finally and realize the truth. I call it coming into the light although it didn’t feel that way at first. It felt like I was everything the church had taught me people who fell away from the church were. I thought I was a sinner, I thought I was doomed forever, I felt I was a bad person. Even though I believed the church was wrong in their practices, and possibly wrong in their entire gospel, I still believed the things they would say about people such as myself who had realized these things. It’s a very strange thought process. But it comes from the brainwashing, the brainwashing I will never quite undo. if I could somehow push a button go back and not know what I know now or see what I see now, I probably would go back. It was just a simpler and easier thing to have faith and blindly follow. I don’t like my brainwashed mind being torn into two constantly over these issues. But that’s exactly what it is. It’s a brainwashing that has torn my head apart. And now that I’m thinking about it,for those who have already been brainwashed it’s probably best you stay that way. You will be happier and feel as if you have a handle on your life and a direction in which you should be going. Because once you find out the truth if you are brainwashed, life becomes very confusing and uncertain. I guess the reason I’m speaking out is because brainwashing people isn’t the way to recruit. What it does to people who do see the truth is horrific. It’s destroyed my life. It will destroy more lives if more people don’t become aware of this problem and make changes.
Two members of the Mormon Church who are in high position callings…. Please stop tying emotions to faith! It’s a form of emotional manipulation and imprisonment. Trust your members 2 make the right decisions for themselves regarding the Mormon church and their lives. but tying and emotion to their face in your church is not right! Emotions and faith are not the same thing!
Hmm, you “cannot believe in God” but the “Holy Spirit has born witness” to you. Interesting. Perhaps the question could be posed to Devin, how do you believe in the Holy Spirit but not God.
I enjoy listening to your speech as why Mormon leave the church! But I think you failed in your speech as to what really is causing LDS to leave the church. I don’t think it doctrinal belief. All through your speech you failed to mention the one root cause. Demonic being! The devil! You not felt it power? You not seen? I have! As young boy i saw this demonic spirit try to take possession of me, I saw it at night and during the day. I over came it possessive power through PRAYER!