207-208: Dealing With a Husband’s LDS Disaffection as a Believing Wife

Janelle was a faithful, believing member of the LDS church when her husband Rich sat her down and told her he was about 90 percent sure the church wasn’t true. In this two-part interview, Natasha Helfer Parker, LCMFT, who blogs at MormonMatters.org, talks with her longtime friend Janelle about what it has been like to stay married to a husband who left his faith while she kept hers.

In part one, Janelle describes her own and Rich’s Mormon upbringings, how they met and married, and the moment he told her he was giving the church three more months before he was done with it. She talks candidly about the shock of that conversation, her first fear that he was confessing an affair instead, and the strain the disaffection put on their shared religious life together, from church attendance to family prayer and scripture study. She describes how Rich’s calm, matter-of-fact response to his own faith crisis left her feeling like she was grieving the loss alone, and she talks about reaching out to a group of her closest Relief Society friends to explain what was happening in her marriage rather than let people wonder and whisper about it behind her back.

In part two, Janelle turns to parenting: how she and Rich have navigated teaching their children when the couple disagrees about what’s actually true, and what it was like when the kids began finding faith-critical material of their own. She talks about the isolation of not having another believing spouse to compare notes with, offers advice for women in similar marriages, and closes by explaining what continues to sustain her own testimony, including the promise of eternal families, temple work for ancestors, and the ordinary daily rhythms of a Mormon home.

What’s covered

  • Part 1 (Ep. 207)
  • 00:00 Introduction and episode overview
  • 02:07 Janelle’s LDS upbringing and family background
  • 17:44 Her husband’s background and church involvement
  • 20:39 The moment her husband shared his disaffection
  • 23:46 Emotional impact of the disclosure
  • 30:37 How disaffection affected daily family life
  • 48:00 Questioning his testimony and their shared faith
  • 57:31 Finding a path through the crisis
  • 1:05:09 Reaching out to fellow believing women
  • Part 2 (Ep. 208)
  • 00:00 Navigating church attendance and social perceptions
  • 12:10 Talking with the children about dad’s disaffection
  • 38:13 Encountering faith-critical information and materials
  • 48:07 Support networks and relationship dynamics
  • 53:45 Advice for believing spouses in similar situations
  • 1:03:44 Sustaining personal testimony and hope for eternal family

Related episodes: Mormon Therapist Natasha Parker on LDS Sexuality, Depression, Faith & Marriage | Ep. 168-169 · Natasha Helfer Parker – Mormon Sex Therapist | Ep. 762-764 · 1156: Reclaiming Healthy Sexuality After a Faith Transition by Natasha Helfer Parker (Thrive June 2019 Conference)

Episode Transcript

Full text · 18,300 words · 13 chaptersHost: John Dehlin · Guests: Janelle, Natasha Helfer

This transcript is machine-generated and lightly edited for readability. The audio is authoritative. Please excuse occasional errors in names and spelling.

Introduction and Episode Overview

Part 1 of 2 · Ep. 207

John Dehlin [00:00:01] Mormon Stories podcast is made possible through the financial contributions of its listeners to keep it alive and available to future generations. Please consider a donation today@mormonstories.org hello, and

Natasha Helfer [00:00:15] welcome to another series of Mormon Stories. This is Natasha Parker, and I am back to give you my second interview in the Mental Health relational series that we're trying to run here today. I have with me a very special guest, a dear friend of mine. We've been friends for about over 10 years. Her name is Janelle, and she will be speaking with us today about her struggles with a husband that has become disaffected with the church. And we realize that this subject has been broached once before on Mormon Stories with a woman named Jackie, which I listened to her interview, as did Janelle, and we discussed that and thought it was a fabulous interview.

Natasha Helfer [00:01:01] She had a lot of wonderful things to say and lots of great ways to deal with the issue. At the same time, we were concerned that it was not completely representative of many people's experience with this when this comes up.

Natasha Helfer [00:01:17] So we thought we would hit the subject again and just kind of talk about it and have Janelle share her story and what her experience has been for the past about five, five and a half years since this came to fruition in her marriage. So. Hello, Janelle.

Janelle [00:01:35] Hi there.

Natasha Helfer [00:01:36] Thank you so much for being with us today. I appreciate your time and welcome. This will be kind of fun for us since. Since our relationship goes way back. So we're both kind of excited to do this. Can you give me a start with Janelle, just a little bit of your background and tell us a little bit about where you come from and how Mormonism fits into your life and just tell us a little bit of your story.

Janelle's LDS Upbringing and Family Background

Janelle [00:02:07] Sure. I was basically raised in the church. My father has been or was a lifelong member, and my mom is a convert to the church. And so.

Natasha Helfer [00:02:22] Because of your father, Right?

Janelle [00:02:24] Because of my father. And so, you know, as a little girl, I was. My mom was learning the gospel, really, as I was growing up, my dad, his family was, you know, again, lifelong members of the church, but not completely active. Not, you know, I think, had testimonies, but not maybe doing, you know, everything

Natasha Helfer [00:02:54] the way Mormons are kind of expected to do.

Janelle [00:02:58] Exactly. Not everything the way they should have, maybe. So I definitely saw my parents struggling a little bit as I was growing up. My mom wanting to live the teachings and the things that she had learned as she was learning the gospel, and my dad really not being comfortable or, you know, totally able to do some of those things. So, like I said, we were active. We went to church every Sunday. But the. The living it in our home was something that we were continually struggling to do. So not as consistent as maybe I would have liked. Certainly not ideal.

Natasha Helfer [00:03:53] And you're the oldest of five siblings, is that correct?

Janelle [00:03:56] Right, right. I served a mission, as did my husband. He and I were married in the temple. He's a BYU graduate. So pretty. Pretty standard for a lot of LDS couples.

Natasha Helfer [00:04:20] And you yourself went to school in Utah there?

Janelle [00:04:25] Utah Valley.

Natasha Helfer [00:04:26] Okay. That's where you guys met, was in Provo.

Janelle [00:04:31] Right.

Natasha Helfer [00:04:32] Okay. Can you tell me a little bit about that? Your courtship and your deciding to get married, and what were things that attracted you and things that maybe concerned you or

Janelle [00:04:45] we met on a blind date, and so those.

Natasha Helfer [00:04:50] Actually. Those work sometimes.

Janelle [00:04:53] Sometimes you. You marry those people that you meet on blind dates. Yes. It was just easy to be. He was easy to talk to, and we were able to be good friends right from the beginning and could be. I mean, there was.

Janelle [00:05:13] I don't know, there was not a need to impress or do anything. There was some honesty right from the beginning that was refreshing and nice. And we dated, you know, pretty normally. And probably after, you know, five or six months, things started becoming more serious, and we started talking about the possibility of getting married. And we, you know, had some similar goals. He's very motivated. He's very, you know, always knew he would be a good provider and that, you know, he was a great student, getting good grades and doing well, and those things were really important to him and definitely was attracted to that, and it was just fun, and it was fun to be around.

Natasha Helfer [00:06:21] So they say hindsight's 20 20. Were there any things that, looking back now, you think, boy, maybe we should have been paying more attention to that? I think one of the struggles that couples who are starting to date and get married, you know, we're told to marry within the church. That's kind of the suggestion that's given to members, is to marry another member and to marry in the temple. Those are kind of things we've all heard growing up to. Do you think that there were things that you just assumed because he was Mormon, or were you guys talking about your testimonies and things like that? Do you think you should have done that more or it didn't matter at that point?

Janelle [00:07:01] Oh, you know, there's probably things that we could have. Again, hindsight is 20 20, but we definitely talked about these things. We attended church together. I remember asking, almost drilling him on a Lot of things. And how would you handle this? And, you know, I wanted to be really sure and I was marrying the right person or that we had the same goals, same things we would be working on.

Janelle [00:07:34] And I remember one time, you know, asking him all these questions and. And one thing he said, I didn't have to ask him any more questions because he just said, you know, that the most important thing that he would teach our children would be about the Savior, Jesus Christ. And I thought, really, that's the most important thing. That's what I want them to know.

Janelle [00:08:05] And so that was kind of it for me as far as the. I didn't continue to drill him and continue to ask him about all these what if scenarios or, you know, trying to predict our future. I felt that if he, you know, that if he wanted to teach our children about the Savior, that really, that's what it all came down to. And that was. That was good with me.

Natasha Helfer [00:08:33] So it's a pretty reassuring statement.

Janelle [00:08:36] Yeah, I felt very confident. Did I think it would. I didn't necessarily think it would be, you know, everything would be perfect, but I definitely felt like that was really the most important thing. So we had definite differences in the way we thought. I mean, Sabbath day things were an issue while we were dating

Natasha Helfer [00:09:07] as far as what was appropriate to do on the Sabbath.

Janelle [00:09:09] Yeah. He was definitely more willing to do more things on Sunday than I felt comfortable doing. So. But, you know, you're in love and take easy to overlook some of those things. And, you know, I always felt like there were. I wasn't perfect. I certainly wasn't expecting to marry somebody who was perfect. And there would be time for us to work on things and improve and,

Natasha Helfer [00:09:37] you know, so you just saw that as normal things that you would have to compromise on and figure out.

Janelle [00:09:44] Love someone.

Natasha Helfer [00:09:46] Yeah. Okay. And they weren't big enough things that obviously drew you away from him, so.

Janelle [00:09:52] Well, I felt that the core things, the really important things, the things to not get Ticci over were there. We shared a testimony and a belief in Jesus Christ, and that was, I don't know, pretty important to me.

Natasha Helfer [00:10:13] Right. Okay, so you guys go ahead and get engaged. Get married in the temple. Start your life together. This is how long ago? About 15 years ago, I think.

Janelle [00:10:28] Yeah, roughly. Yep.

Natasha Helfer [00:10:30] So when did this start or these kinds of issues start kind of becoming more problematic?

Janelle [00:10:38] Oh, within that first year or so of marriage. It was, you know, know, becoming, I guess, difficult. There were some frustrations that we had with one another. He didn't necessarily feel like he needed to go to church every Sunday. And we were living in an area where, you know, our church was far away. You know, the church we were to attend was quite, quite a ways away. And there was another one just down the road. But he felt like going to the closer one was totally fine. And I felt like we ought to attend, you know, the ward whose boundaries we were in. And it seems, you know, that may seem petty or even, like, not a big deal.

Janelle [00:11:34] And we can certainly say that looking back, but it was important to me. Yeah, it was important to me to do the things that we were asked to. We were certainly able. We were certainly, you know, capable of getting ourselves there. That was not a problem. And so I felt that that was important.

Natasha Helfer [00:11:56] So it's small things like this that start maybe driving, not a huge wedge, but maybe start bringing up some concerns or some disappointment in one another.

Janelle [00:12:08] Right. It becomes very clear that you're not on the same page and that there's some differences in attitudes and expectations maybe.

Natasha Helfer [00:12:21] Okay, so this continues for a while, these kinds of little things, or do you guys ever find yourselves, like, really having arguments about it or you just kind of get grumpy? I mean, how big of a deal was it as far as your communication together?

Janelle [00:12:42] Oh, this is something I think that we have struggled with our whole marriage. You know, me wanting to be more active than my husband felt the need to be. He felt that you didn't need to, like I said, go every Sunday. You didn't need to be a home teacher. You didn't need to go to the temple all the time. None of those things were not. He was not having a problem not doing all of those things.

Natasha Helfer [00:13:17] And was that due to. In your mind, was that due to the fact that he was having philosophical issues with the church, or was that more just his kind of lifestyle or what the things he wanted to do with his life?

Janelle [00:13:32] I think it was definitely more lifestyle. I think that he had other things he was interested in doing that, you know, I mean, church callings cut into your free time. And I think that was hard for him to give up time, free time. He's very, you know, conscientious.

Natasha Helfer [00:13:54] So you weren't having any big discussions about church history at this time or questioning?

Janelle [00:13:59] Not at all. Not at all. It was just that I think the frustration or aggravation of callings that are time consuming. And quite honestly, for certain people, they're uncomfortable. They're not. Everybody feels. Comfortable being a home teacher. Going into someone's home, you don't know and there's. They know why you're there. They know that you've been assigned to home teach them. And, you know, I think that was something that he was never comfortable doing. That it wasn't. It wasn't his own idea. It was an assignment. And I think he felt uncomfortable doing that, which, which I get. But it doesn't have to be that way either.

Natasha Helfer [00:14:56] Right. So things that maybe were important to you weren't as important to him, vice versa. And then you guys are just kind of finding yourselves just struggling in how to communicate about these things.

Janelle [00:15:09] Well, and I think you. I think we automatically, you know, assumed that, you know, I think he viewed me as, you know, you know, super hyperactive girl, and I viewed him as, you know, practically inactive. And so those, those weren't really where we were truly at. But I think we tend to exaggerate.

Natasha Helfer [00:15:37] And so you kind of put that way you labeled each other and you kind of maybe exaggerated in your.

Janelle [00:15:44] Right.

Natasha Helfer [00:15:45] Because you weren't feeling validated, you kind of exaggerated where the other person was.

Janelle [00:15:49] Well, I think you're concerned and you, you exaggerate that discrepancy that is there, you know, where he is going. He is, you know, attending meetings, but, you know, maybe he's not doing everything that I would have liked. And so I'm, you know, exaggerating and saying he's doing nothing instead of recognizing what he is doing. And I think, yeah, the fear that that would happen or I think that all plays into. Plays into there. Look into that a little bit.

Natasha Helfer [00:16:30] Well, this is what I talk about with couples so often. As, you know, we get stuck in our focus on the stuff that, you know, isn't going well and the stuff that is going well, we just, we don't really. Well, that doesn't draw our attention as much because we're not concerned about those things. Right.

Janelle [00:16:47] Well, and by, you know, the standards, I think, you know, in ways that I was raised, in ways that he was raised and our attitudes about that, I mean, I, I kind of always hoped to be a little bit better. I wanted to improve and, you know, had things I wanted to work on and was very well aware of areas where I struggle and fall short. And just, I thought that that was something that we were doing together, where we were going to get better all the time. And I think he was very happy and felt like he was doing more than he had expected or saw himself or was even comfortable with or used to from his growing up experience.

Her Husband's Background and Faith Journey

Natasha Helfer [00:17:44] Are you comfortable telling me a little bit about his background or where he came from as far as what kind of. You kind of set the stage a little bit about where, you know, the home that you grew up in and some of the struggles you saw there and that how maybe that formulated your thoughts about your own marriage. What about him?

Janelle [00:18:02] He was raised in an LDS family as well. Both parents raised in the church with varying degrees, but served a mission again. So his father became disaffected with the church.

Natasha Helfer [00:18:26] At what point of your husband's growing up?

Janelle [00:18:29] You know, it was at different times, more so. So I think through different times, through his growing up. I think he was fairly active through most of my husband's younger years. But, you know, that's not been one I've really been able to put my finger on still. But I think he's always had some, you know, issues that he's. That have bothered him.

Natasha Helfer [00:19:06] Your husband or his father?

Janelle [00:19:07] You mean his father. Okay, his father. So, you know, these are things my husband saw growing up. I'm not sure. I don't think it was something that was really talked about in the home, but there was a. There's just a more casual way of doing things. And I don't know that. Like I said, I don't believe it was communicated. Okay,

Natasha Helfer [00:19:40] so then the mother in that home, his mother was the one that was more active or more involved in.

Janelle [00:19:46] And she grew up with, again, you know, LDS parents who really took her to church and basically dropped her off. And she determined from a young age that she was always going to be active in the church. And so she. Was the one who made that happen,

Natasha Helfer [00:20:14] who made it a priority. Right. Okay, so let's move ahead then, to how this becomes more of a formal disaffection for your husband and how that becomes more how he communicates that with you.

The Moment Her Husband Shared His Disaffection

Janelle [00:20:39] Well, he just, you know, He just came to me one day and said that he had needed to talk to me and shared that he'd been reading some things in preparation for Elders Quorum lesson and for Sunday school lessons that he was teaching at the time. And he had been reading some things that I was unaware of, things online and along those lines and just said he was 90% sure that the church was not true and said he was going to give it three more months and after that he was going to be done. And so I felt, you know, of course, that it was already done. I don't. I mean, I was glad for the three months.

Natasha Helfer [00:21:44] So. Meaning that he was going to look into it or research more or like, try to find answers Is that what he meant by the three months?

Janelle [00:21:54] You know, that's. I don't know exactly what he meant by the three months. I think that he was more than anything along those lines. He was letting me know that, like a timetable, at some point he wasn't going to be attending with me anymore. I think more to get me used to the idea that, you know, he wouldn't be there.

Natasha Helfer [00:22:19] Did you see this coming at all?

Janelle [00:22:21] Well, you know, how do you. In some ways, yes, because, you know, he looks up to his father a great deal. And I kind of, you know, always suspected or always worried that he would follow in this path. And I didn't expect it at this point. I expected it maybe later down the road.

Natasha Helfer [00:22:50] When he was older, you mean?

Janelle [00:22:51] Yeah, when he was older, not when we had little kids. And, you know, it's. So

Natasha Helfer [00:22:59] this happened how many years ago?

Janelle [00:23:02] About five and a half years ago.

Natasha Helfer [00:23:03] And how many children did you have at that point and their ages?

Janelle [00:23:07] We had three children.

Natasha Helfer [00:23:10] Which you still have.

Janelle [00:23:12] We still have. And that's. We still have three children. Our oldest had just turned six and our youngest was four months old.

John Dehlin [00:23:24] Okay.

Janelle [00:23:26] So little kids. And we were in the throes of, you know, teaching them, and I was enjoying that, you know, teaching them the gospel, and they were enjoying learning it.

Emotional Impact of Learning About His Doubts

Natasha Helfer [00:23:46] So can you create for us a little bit of the feeling or what this was like for you to have him sit you down and. And kind of share this with you? What was going on in your head or in your mind?

Janelle [00:24:03] Well, I think, to be perfectly honest, the first thing he says when he says he has to talk is I'm thinking he's had an affair. And so, quite honestly, this was. Even though I was devastated, I was devastated, but it wasn't the first thing that came to my mind.

Natasha Helfer [00:24:28] So as soon as he said, I need to talk, you knew something was bad. It was bad. Right.

Janelle [00:24:33] He's not a huge talker. I felt like we have great communication when we were dating and loved talking, and he's just not a huge talker. So he was definitely impressing me with that when we were dating. So, yeah, I knew by his tone, and I think he was nervous to tell me. He knew that this would be really hard for me. He knew that it wasn't going to be. It wasn't going to go over easy. And so I think he was worried about that, but felt like he needed to do that at some point, needed to get it over with. And so he did and just shared some of the things that he'd been reading and he was pretty unhappy because he felt like he'd been duped or. How can he not know these things?

Natasha Helfer [00:25:40] This is all getting into a lot of our historical issues with the church.

Janelle [00:25:44] Exactly. Historical issues, things with Joseph Smith, and just the way some things were handled in early church history and even some modern things that have been written regarding DNA and the Book of Mormon and things along those lines.

Natasha Helfer [00:26:01] Right.

Janelle [00:26:06] So I was pretty devastated, as putting it mildly. I was really. I had the rug pulled out from under me. And remember, when I look back at those times now, just remember being in a fog and just feeling a huge, heavy. Just a heavy heart I had at that time, a sense of hopelessness that. Things that I thought we were working on together, although far from perfect, that that hope was gone of the. You know, that keep moving forward, that working together towards something that was dashed pretty quickly and, yeah, that was just pretty hard, pretty heartbreaking time for me.

Natasha Helfer [00:27:01] Yeah. I remember many conversations we had during that time where, you know, your emotion was very raw. And I will say, just for the benefit of your husband, because I love your husband. I obviously know him as well, and he's a wonderful man and like you said, has many strengths and great father. And so by no means am I wanting to throw him under the bus with this interview, but just, you know, with the idea that we're really trying to kind of put out there this.

Natasha Helfer [00:27:39] How many couples are dealing with similar things and how it can be very heartbreaking and very emotionally wrenching. And it doesn't really have to do with anybody being bad or good or anything like that. It just. It's what it is.

Natasha Helfer [00:27:54] And so, yeah, I just. I do remember. And it wasn't something that went away for you very easily. In fact, still to this day, there are times that we. We still talk, and it's very. It's just very emotional for you.

Janelle [00:28:09] Yeah, it is. Really.

Natasha Helfer [00:28:10] It's.

Janelle [00:28:12] It's easily the hardest thing I've ever gone through. And, you know, I can talk about it now, but for a long time, it was really hard. It was. I couldn't. And I was angry. The devastation quickly gave way to feeling just really angry. And, you know, it felt very deliberate. It felt. I felt tricked. I felt. I felt like it was a personal attack on me. It took me a while to realize that this was not about me. This was not something that he had set out to do to me. This would have happened, most likely with anyone that he had married. It wasn't. It wasn't about me.

Natasha Helfer [00:29:05] Right.

Janelle [00:29:06] It wasn't done to me, just his decision, but it felt very done to me. That felt very. It was incredibly painful those first several months. And like you said, still it's not that continually raw feeling anymore. It has more episodes or more cycles.

Natasha Helfer [00:29:35] Yeah.

Janelle [00:29:36] Events, you know, are hard to get through. Certain events, certain lessons on Sunday are hard to get through. Certain questions are hard to deal with. The temple is harder for me than before. Wasn't hard for me before, but it's hard for me now. It's just changed some things I'm pretty sensitive

Natasha Helfer [00:30:13] about. Well, in a culture, in a Mormon culture where we put a lot of emphasis on family and we put a lot of emphasis on raising children in the church and we put a lot of emphasis on the eternal nature of these things, I can only imagine that it would be difficult.

Janelle [00:30:31] Right, right.

How Disaffection Began Affecting Daily Family Life

Natasha Helfer [00:30:37] So let's talk a little bit about how this started affecting the day to day life. You know, like you mentioned, he kind of gave you a three month time frame to maybe get used to this idea. But now things were going to change. Things that maybe you guys had to either discuss or compromise or maybe they weren't even up for compromise. Like, you know, are we going to go to church together? Are we not? What do we do about family home evenings, family scripture study, you know, prayers in the home, just, you know, all these little things that are so much a part of our family Mormon lifestyle that I know that you were very much trying to implement in your home. How did it start affecting all of those things?

Janelle [00:31:25] Well, you say start implementing. I mean, I think that those were, those were things that we, I don't think had successfully implemented. Those were always things I was trying and wanting to do, but I think, and always waiting like I think other wives sometimes do. You kind of wait for the priesthood leader to say it's time for family prayer or let's have family scripture study, let's have family home evening. And those things weren't happening and unless I did them. And so as far as big changes there, no, that was not a big change other than I now knew that if those things were going to happen, it was solely on my shoulders.

Janelle [00:32:12] And that was a relief in some ways to know that if these things, you know, that I needed to do them and so I did. And he loves our family. He doesn't want to miss out on things. He wants to be included and involved.

Janelle [00:32:36] And so if I plan a family home evening, if I say let's have a prayer, he is there, he will participate and do that he's not

John Dehlin [00:32:49] the

Janelle [00:32:49] one who's likely to call for those things, but he will. He will attend and he will participate.

Natasha Helfer [00:32:58] And you see that as a helpful thing, obviously. Well, I'm trying.

Janelle [00:33:03] I'm trying to look for, you know, the good that is there and, you know, try to, you know, I believe that Heavenly Father has some purpose in this, and I'm trying to look for that. And that's what I've come up with. That rather than it not being done because I'm waiting for it to happen, or we're waiting for him to feel comfortable or recognize that that needs to be done, I no longer have to do that.

Natasha Helfer [00:33:45] Did you ever have a sit down with him and say, look, these are the things that I'm going to do and you can either partake in them or not, but these are not up for discussion? Or did you actually sit down and say, so what are we going to discuss? Or has this just kind of evolved naturally?

Janelle [00:34:01] I did try to have a sit down. In fact, I had a nicely typed list of the things that I would like to have happen. And my husband is not really willing to be nailed down to some of those. To things like that, things that he knows may change later. He's not really willing to, you know, commit to or promise something that he does not know that he can deliver on.

Natasha Helfer [00:34:33] Yep. Can you share some of the things that were on your list or do you remember?

Janelle [00:34:38] I wish I could remember better things like participating in father daughter and father son events at church, you know, state camp outs or daddy daughter dates or things like that, that I still expected him to do. That participating in family home evening. I requested that he do what he needed to do so that he could perform ordinances so that he could baptize our kids. I asked for. I asked him to be respectful of my beliefs and to, you know, not. I wanted his attitude, too, about what I was still trying to do. Not be negative and not put. Not to put our children in the middle of choosing between mom and dad,

Natasha Helfer [00:35:46] that kind of thing, to support the fact that you were still believer, not to look down on you for that.

Janelle [00:35:53] And I didn't want any eye rolling, I didn't want any sighs or, you know, expressions when, you know, I talked about or shared things that were a very huge and important part of my

Natasha Helfer [00:36:12] life, especially in front of your children. Right.

Janelle [00:36:18] If I had a calling, I asked him to recognize my desire to volunteer and to serve and to be of help and to appreciate that and not, you know, treat it like a waste of time or that I'm doing something unimportant.

Natasha Helfer [00:36:40] And this list came because you were feeling these things or.

Janelle [00:36:45] Well, I felt like we needed to. I mean, we couldn't constantly be dealing with. I felt like addressing it beforehand would just make us that much stronger. We'd know. There wouldn't be any guessing. I'd know where he stood. We'd have a kind of a game plan as to how things would go compromising. I've had to learn to compromise more than I ever thought I would.

Natasha Helfer [00:37:22] Right. So talking about the marriage, if I remember correctly, there was a time when we were talking about this and your husband was with us. We were talking, all three of us together, and he said something along the lines of, he said to you, I don't want this to ruin our family. I strongly believe that we can still be a family. This was pretty early on, so I think the emotions were still pretty raw. Did you ever see this as a threat to your marriage? Did you see this? Did you consider leaving him or he you or did you ever think this would be something insurmountable?

Janelle [00:38:12] I think in my angry phase, you know, I wondered if that, you know, if maybe this wasn't going to work out, if these were just too. We were just too drastically headed to drastically different places. You know, being united spiritually and with a common goal is pretty important. And I did wonder if our marriage would stay intact and if I needed to look at, you know, if I should leave him.

Natasha Helfer [00:38:57] Because I think sometimes in a lot of the interviews I hear people who leave the church, they see this as kind of a weakness in the spouse. Like why would it be that only this changing should ruin a relationship? And although I see that part of it and I understand that the church shouldn't ruin a relationship, at the same time, I think that we sometimes don't validate these feelings of the spouse that it's not just, oh yeah, well, I just changed one or two thoughts about my church beliefs. And so what's the big deal? It really does affect, kind of like you're saying this idea of spiritual unity, of having common goals. And the Mormon lifestyle is exactly that, it's a lifestyle. And so it's changing many things that about your day to day kind of existence together.

Janelle [00:39:52] Right.

Natasha Helfer [00:39:55] So what do you have to say about people who might criticize that or criticize the spouse for thinking of leaving or for considering divorce?

Janelle [00:40:06] Oh, I don't know. I mean, I think we, I think people have divorced for sillier things than that. I don't really know how to answer that

Natasha Helfer [00:40:27] other than those feelings were probably pretty real for you.

Janelle [00:40:30] They were very real. It was very. I felt very. I was devastated. I was, I. And it felt very personal. The thing that he knew from the beginning, he knew how important the gospel was to me and living it, and he knew how I felt about things. And I felt like the one thing that it was almost like the one thing that would hurt me the most, that it felt very intentional. I was not in a frame of mind yet to be. I wasn't rational. It was hurtful. So I wasn't really thinking that way. I was. Was more of a self preservation kind of feeling. And you know, I had friends who asked me if I was going to leave him.

Natasha Helfer [00:41:28] Church friends.

Janelle [00:41:29] Church friends. And before I'd really even thought about that option. But, you know, it doesn't. It didn't take long at all to, you know, to realize and to stop and think, this man wants to stay married. He loves me, he loves our children, he is a great dad. There are many good things. And that if I were to leave him. What am I saying about covenants in the temple that I've made? What am I. I'm saying those are not important. I'm saying that I can only love him if he believes the exact same way that I do. I feel like there's no room for. That's conditional love is what that is. And I felt like that's so contrary to the Savior and what he would have me do, that that was it. I didn't. I didn't ever think about that.

Natasha Helfer [00:42:48] What was it like to have friends bring that up? I remember you even sharing a little bit of anger about that or, you know, like, why would they put me in that position to think about that? Or. I don't know. I don't know if I'm not remembering that right.

Janelle [00:43:06] Well, I mean, I think it just. Yeah, it felt. I mean. And I think what. I think what it is, and it's what friends do is, I mean, they're feeling protective of me and. You know, just maybe thinking that maybe, I don't know, maybe that was something to consider. I don't like to. I don't want to think that. I don't believe that they were malicious.

Natasha Helfer [00:43:43] Oh yeah.

Janelle [00:43:45] But I. I think that when you. I think it was, I don't know,

Natasha Helfer [00:43:54] they see you hurt and so they want to help you not hurt anymore. Right.

Janelle [00:43:59] Well. And I think they value having an active, worthy priesthood leader in their home and can't imagine how hard it must be to not. And you wonder, would it be easier, would it be better to try again, start over? And I just felt like, you know, we hear our church leaders and our prophet just warning about the attack on the family. And I felt like this would be one way that I would be contributing to the demise of a family, that there was no, you know, I wasn't being abused. I was not in danger. I was not. I mean, there are situations where it is appropriate to end a marriage, but that this was not one of them. I felt strongly that that was the case.

Natasha Helfer [00:44:56] Right.

Janelle [00:44:57] I had a lot of assurance, reassurance from Rich that, you know, he did not. That he valued our marriage, that he did not want this to end. He, you know, wanted our family to pull through this and to be stronger because of it, and we could be a strong family and still have these differences. Was it going to be easy? No. But he, you know, felt that he could do it. So.

Natasha Helfer [00:45:32] Yeah, I think that that's been a pretty steady message, a pretty consistent message that he has given you throughout all these years.

Janelle [00:45:41] Right, right. Because I think where I was. I think where I've been, you know, hurt and feeling like we've both. Let me just put it this way, we've both given up to keep things working, and that's been. That's been good for us to do that. He's been very patient. And I think he tries to understand. He can't quite completely understand, but he tries, and we're still working on it. We don't talk about it all the time. We don't. I'm not crying all the time like I used to, but there are instances where, you know, we're faced with some things we need to talk about.

Natasha Helfer [00:46:49] Right. Well, and I think that he was, like you said, he knew that this would be difficult for you, but at the same time, I do believe also that he was surprised at the extent of how difficult it was for you.

Janelle [00:47:01] Yes, he. For sure, he thought that I would be over it much quicker than. And moving on a lot sooner. So he's been really. I mean, really. I mean, I was the one devastated by this, but he has been the supreme example of patience in letting me mourn this huge loss and, you know, trying to be patient.

Natasha Helfer [00:47:38] Kind of like the grieving process, just letting you kind of go through all those stages.

Janelle [00:47:44] Right. I mean, I think, of course, he wishes it was faster. He wishes it was not to the extent that it was, but. But it wasn't. Right. It was really hard.

Strains on the Marriage and Questions About Testimony

Natasha Helfer [00:48:00] One thing you mentioned Once is that. Well, with your, you know, you and your husband, like all of us with our spouses, have different personality traits. And, you know, I would definitely. Not that I love labels, but your husband is definitely an intellectual type person, very logical thinking, and that's a great strength of his. You mentioned one time, though, that maybe the weakness part of that is that this wasn't a devastating thing for him to go through necessarily. Like, he just kind of was very matter of fact about it. You didn't necessarily see him grieving his testimony or not at all.

Janelle [00:48:40] No, I feel like this was almost like a relief to him because of things he struggled to do anyway. So I don't. Yeah, I. I did not see this as a hard thing for him. His hardest. The hardest part for him was in telling me, but this is not something I saw him agonize over. It was not something that he was coming to me and saying, you know, let's, you know, this is significant and I need to fast about this and can we have a prayer together? And he was not struggling that way at all.

Natasha Helfer [00:49:24] And this is, again, something that, when I hear many of the interviews that especially have been talked about on Mormon stories and even John Dehlin's own experience is very different from that, that many people, you know, once they find out these things, it's just. It's as. It's as emotionally wrenching of an experience kind of as what you describe. However, I don't believe that's always the. And I think there are many people like your husband, where it's just kind of like, yeah, see, I kind of knew that all along, or I wasn't that attached to begin with or.

Janelle [00:49:55] Right.

Natasha Helfer [00:49:56] You know, and so there's that part of it. And then I think for the spouse and something I remember hearing you say and even how you kind of set up this whole interview now, there were little things that, you know, you felt like, well, he's just not as committed or he's not as. And so you kind of start getting into the labels of, well, you're just lazy or you just don't want to do this, or you're not as spiritual or, you know, and I think those kinds of things maybe even affected the respect that you had for your husband.

Janelle [00:50:26] Oh, for sure, for sure. Absolutely. It was hard to trust that he would, you know, had our family's best interests at heart when he was abandoning something so core and so, you know, of great value to me in the rearing of our family. So I didn't. It changed that level for me.

Natasha Helfer [00:50:58] Right. And that some people. I guess what I just want to bring out is that there's so many stories all over the spectrum on this, you know, that there are the people who lose their testimonies and who have been, you know, out there doing either kind of the Molly Mormon or Peter priesthood type lifestyle and doing everything right, and then they come across information or situations and then it's this dramatic fall. But there are also many who aren't necessarily living every single aspect or expectation that the church has, which are many, and then the falling away is less, maybe emotionally traumatic for them in that sense. So there's just kind of. And not that that means they're lazy or unspiritual. It just means that there's all different types.

Janelle [00:51:44] Well, I think I find myself, you know, just wondering about, you know, what kind of testimony was there to begin with. Like, I obviously thought that there was one and felt, you know, confident, felt very good, and had, you know, spiritual reassurance that marrying my husband was what I should do. I just, I wonder about if he was able. If at any point he ever had a strong testimony or if he was able just to go through, you know, some of the motions and, you know, expecting that or thinking that that was there, but then really having nothing to rely on, you know, when these questions arose or when these things came to his attention. I don't know.

Natasha Helfer [00:52:48] So as the spouse of somebody who is more in this camp, how do you fight those feelings? Well, you know, if he would have just fasted more, if he would have been praying more, if he would have been reading his scriptures, if he would have been doing the, you know, 20 things that we're supposed to be doing, that the prophets. How do you come to terms with that? Or do you not. Or do you just see it as. Yeah, maybe if he would have been doing those things, he would still have a testimony, but that's just not the path he went down. Or how do you think about that? Well, that's.

Janelle [00:53:23] Without totally beating him up. I certainly don't want to disrespect or pick on him more than I'm probably already doing. I just. I don't think he was comfortable doing those things. I don't think he always knew how to do those things

Natasha Helfer [00:53:46] or that they elicited the same spiritual experiences that may for other people, those things do.

Janelle [00:53:51] Right. And so. It just, it was very. It was very seemingly simple for him to reach this conclusion. So. I kind of chalked it up to this is what happens when you don't, you know, do those things that we're taught to do, you know, those primary answers of reading the Scriptures and, you know, saying your prayers. And they're primary for a reason, because they're those basic things that we need to do to maintain that relationship with our Heavenly Father and keep that connection open is what I believe.

Natasha Helfer [00:54:43] Right. And so then how have you been able to either rebuild or begin to rebuild your respect for your husband with that belief in mind?

Janelle [00:54:57] Um, well, I don't know. It's kind of hard to go to my Heavenly Father and complain about my husband, who he loves as equally as he loves me. So recognizing and realizing that he is still a son of God, that he has. That he's maybe forgotten or doesn't realize who he is, but I know who he is, and Heavenly Father knows who he is. And just remembering that he's still of value, he is still of great worth and that I still love him.

Natasha Helfer [00:55:55] Right.

Janelle [00:55:56] Despite.

Natasha Helfer [00:55:59] Right.

Janelle [00:56:01] Where things are at. I don't know if that sounds too corny or too cliche.

Natasha Helfer [00:56:09] I think it sounds great.

Janelle [00:56:09] He is the son of God, but I believe that.

Natasha Helfer [00:56:14] Yeah. No, I've always thought so many of the things that you say are just very wise and, I don't know, just always touch something in me that. And this is part of why I asked you to do this, because I think you have all these very.

Natasha Helfer [00:56:36] I don't know, just tidbits of little things you say that are just very touching and I think cut to the core of a lot of these issues that I hope will be helpful to those who are listening to us.

Navigating the Marriage Through Faith Differences

Natasha Helfer [00:56:52] Okay, so let's talk now, then, about. We've talked a lot about kind of your marriage and how that relationship has struggled and continued. Let's talk a little bit about. You mentioned events and you mentioned lessons at church and now your relationship with your friends. And you did something, I thought very interesting early on, and you kind of called a meeting of sorts. You took charge. Are you comfortable talking about that and telling us what you did?

Janelle [00:57:31] Sure. I just decided. I mean, this had been probably a year and a year and a half later. And again, I'm still struggling. I'm still devastated and hurt. And, you know, I have visiting teachers who know that Rich isn't attending, but they don't really know what to say to me.

Janelle [00:57:58] They even friends who, you know, it's like anything, the loss of a loved one. You know, there's situations where you don't know what to say, and so you don't say Anything. And I just decided that I was going to be proactive and not make people guess or wonder. I was going to just be very forthright and let them know where things were, what was going on.

Janelle [00:58:29] And my hope was that. That, you know, they would have. There wouldn't be anything to talk about behind my back. Not that I think that that was going on, but certainly people were noticing that Rich wasn't, you know, at church with us or that I was struggling or any multitude of things.

Janelle [00:58:51] I just wanted to draw on their strength, I think, to maybe even share some of what I was going through. But. My biggest hope was that. These other women would be aware of my children and just be there to encourage and help them along.

Janelle [00:59:44] You know, these were women who were my dear, good friends and who were in the primary presidency and could certainly be sensitive to my children's situation and could knowledgeably. Is that a word?

Natasha Helfer [01:00:06] I think so, yes.

Janelle [01:00:08] They could answer questions. They would know what was going on, and so they could confidently say, this is what's happened, and it could just be dealt with very matter of fact. Instead of, you know, nobody knowing exactly what was going on or that kind of thing, I wanted to place my confidence in them and, you know, ask for their. Their help or their. Their sensitivity to the situation that I was going through.

Natasha Helfer [01:00:48] So you kind of created your own ritual, which I thought was genius, and called a meeting. Can you tell me exactly what were the formalities of that? Who did you approach first?

Janelle [01:01:01] I just asked a good friend of mine if she thought, you know, it's something I'd been thinking of doing is just opening this up. Nobody wanted to make me have to repeat it or explain it a hundred times. And yet they all wondered, I think, what was going on. And so I thought maybe I could just get everybody together and explain it all at once, and then they would never need to feel like they were talking behind my back or, you know, if they asked somebody what was going on or, you know, if they wondered

Natasha Helfer [01:01:39] which out of concern is what we are. We do. We do this. Right.

Janelle [01:01:43] Right. I wasn't even worried about. I was. I just thought that it would be. I just wanted to be proactive. I wanted to have some control in the situation I had very little control in. I wanted to. I wanted to be. I just wanted to, like I said, be proactive. I didn't want to. I didn't want to see myself slowly feel uncomfortable or feel like I'm. I don't belong. And so I wanted to just. I wanted to share that with them.

Natasha Helfer [01:02:23] And surprisingly, you met a tad bit of resistance, if I remember.

Janelle [01:02:30] I think some people were worried about that I would. That I was going to just. Rich would be raked over the coals and. And, yeah, I had to clarify and make sure that he would. They knew that he was aware that I.

Natasha Helfer [01:02:52] That you were doing this.

Janelle [01:02:54] Doing this. It was not any. You know, that wasn't even my thoughts at all to go and speak badly of my husband. It was just to be just basically informative, to hear it directly from me so that there would be no doubt or question as to where things really were and to kind of. I mean, I felt it to be. I wanted it to be. Sharing, kind of like I was entrusting this. This thing that was kind of embarrassing and definitely not something I was viewing as a positive, but that I was opening that up and in a more

Natasha Helfer [01:03:51] forthcoming way and just kind of putting it on the table.

Janelle [01:03:55] Right.

Natasha Helfer [01:03:57] Instead of all this dancing around. We do sometimes.

Janelle [01:04:00] Right. So that they wouldn't. I guess. Yeah. So that they would just. They would know it from me, where things were at.

Natasha Helfer [01:04:07] And

Janelle [01:04:09] I meant it to be inclusive to them. I was, like I said, opening up something that was pretty tender and sensitive to me. And my intention was that. That would

Natasha Helfer [01:04:27] make things easier in the long run and. Right.

Janelle [01:04:31] Thanks for filling in my words when I seem to be able to get them. I talked with Rich, and he was. I mean, I think he. The poor guy struggles with how to even know how to help me deal with this extreme sadness. And so I think he was supportive of anything that would make it easier for me. And if talking to friends and explaining it matter of factly would do that, then he was completely supportive.

John Dehlin [01:05:07] Right.

Building a Support Group for Believing Spouses

Natasha Helfer [01:05:09] So you got. You decided to do this in a. In a friend's home. You pretty much invited most of the Relief Society sisters that you knew pretty well. Is that kind of how it went?

Janelle [01:05:20] I probably had a dozen of my closest friends there.

Natasha Helfer [01:05:30] And how did it go?

Janelle [01:05:31] Oh, I think it was fine. There was definitely tears. I had a good friend of mine, She just kind of conducted, if you will, and I had written down my thoughts because I knew that I would do what I'm doing right now and not be able to talk very well. And I just shared with them. I don't know why I'm crying now about this. This was nothing. I just shared with them where I was at. And we. They asked me some questions that were, you know, everything was very appropriate and very, very considerate, very sensitive, very lovingly done, and we pray together. And we went around about the rest of our day.

Natasha Helfer [01:06:58] So release Society in action.

Janelle [01:07:01] Yeah, it was nice for me just to be able to say this is where it is and, you know, this is what would be helpful and that kind of thing.

Natasha Helfer [01:07:24] Right? Yeah. Like I said, I thought it was a genius plan. That was very helpful. I wish we had more things like that that we could somehow tap into on a more, like I said, ritual level. Right. We have rituals to help us in all of our celebrations, but the only ritual I really know of to help us in sadness is a funeral. And there's so many other sad things that sometimes we need kind of more formal gatherings around to be able to help us process and get through things.

Janelle [01:08:03] I felt that need to be, like you said, the Relief Society in action to bear one another's burdens. How can we bear them if we don't know what they are? And I mean, I shared at that time that, you know, I know I'm not the only one with problems and that I would, you know, I would be happy to be there and to help in others circumstances or situations where they're struggling. Some struggles are more visible than others. Mine happens to be, I mean, something that feels very visible to me. It's obvious that I'm at church alone and, you know, people started asking where Rich was and things like that.

Natasha Helfer [01:09:09] And

Janelle [01:09:12] I just thought this meeting was a way to just to reach out and place my trust and confidence in the strength of all those good women.

John Dehlin [01:09:35] Thank you for joining us today on Mormon Stories. To comment on this episode or to discuss it with others, please check us out online@mormonstories.org if you want to find other friends, family members, former missionary companions, or ward members who approach Mormonism like you, consider adding me, John Dehlin, as your Facebook friend. This may seem like a strange idea, but many of my closest friends have discovered that they are not alone in their thoughts or feelings or family or even word situation through discovering mutual Facebook friends. Finally, to keep Mormon stories alive, please consider a donation@mormonstories.org music on this episode was provided by Clayton and Sky Pixton.

Janelle [01:10:17] Nearer my God to thee Nearer to thee Even though it be across thee still oh, oh, my song shall be Nearer I go to thee Nearer my go to Nearer to thee.

Part Two Begins: Life as a Believing Wife

Part 2 of 2 · Ep. 208

John Dehlin [00:00:01] Mormon Stories podcast is made possible through the financial contributions of its listeners to keep it alive and available to future generations. Please consider a donation today@mormonstories.org

Natasha Helfer [00:00:15] can you

Janelle [00:00:15] talk a little bit about. I can't talk at all. I'll try.

Natasha Helfer [00:00:24] Now, I know you said you'd be concerned about becoming emotional, but I, you know, I welcome your emotion because I think it's so. And I appreciate your willingness to be this vulnerable on such a public forum because I think that these are the emotions that, you know, I see so often and people that are really hurting and struggling. So I really appreciate that, Janelle, for you to be willing to do this.

Natasha Helfer [00:00:59] So, yeah. Through your sniffling, can you tell me what, you know, when people started asking questions like where's Rich? Or what's going on with Rich? Or you know, just kind of people who are trying to say something. Like you said, people don't know always what to say. And, and this is a whole other issue is helping to, you know, helping people know what's appropriate or inappropriate in these situations. But what kinds of things did you find helpful to, to kind of say back to, to these types of questions?

Janelle [00:01:31] Oh, I was just, you know, he's not, he's not coming. He's, he's not coming anymore. I was pretty, I, you know, everyone always, they just assumed he was traveling with business or maybe he wasn't feeling well. So all very well intentioned questions. You know, they see me struggling with a six month old or a, you know, an on up and they just, you know, are there to help and they would ask, where's Rich? And I just said, he's not, you know, he's not coming anymore. And they were always surprised and. You know, I would always get a hug and, and I'm so sorry to hear that. And what else? You know, what else? They didn't need to say anything else. It was, that was

Natasha Helfer [00:02:42] okay.

Janelle [00:02:43] Yeah, that was totally fine. And I never felt the need to, you know, make up anything or.

Natasha Helfer [00:02:58] You were pretty honest about it from the.

Janelle [00:03:01] Yeah, I didn't.

Natasha Helfer [00:03:04] Yeah.

Janelle [00:03:04] I don't think I had the emotional energy to try to concoct a story.

Natasha Helfer [00:03:12] Sure. What about the priesthood? Like, did you guys go in and talk to your bishop or did they come to you or try to convince him or.

Janelle [00:03:22] We went to our bishop right away and Rich explained, you know, the trial that he was having with his faith, how he described it and wanted to be released right away from his calling, which was teaching. Oh boy. I think he was teaching Book of Mormon and coming up on church history the next year, and did not feel that he could honestly do that, and so he asked for that release. That did not happen right away. I think our poor bishop was surprised and, you know, of course, worried for me and worried for Rich, but everything in that area was, I think, handled very well under the circumstances. That's just hard for everybody.

Natasha Helfer [00:04:24] Right. You know, and did your husband ever feel offended by any of the church leaders or anything like that, or did he pretty much understand where they were coming from? And

Janelle [00:04:37] I think he was. I think he was fine. I don't believe he was ever offended. He is so. He's hard to offend. He's very easygoing, very, you know, just naturally inclined to give people the benefit of the doubt and does not really take offense. And our bishop was a good friend, and so.

Natasha Helfer [00:05:05] Right.

Janelle [00:05:06] I think it probably went as well as can be expected. I think we were, you know,

Natasha Helfer [00:05:15] of

Janelle [00:05:15] course, I think he was disappointed to hear that this was where Rich was at and, you know, didn't want that for our family. But I think he tried to get us through, you know, the best that anyone could.

Natasha Helfer [00:05:33] Right.

Janelle [00:05:33] This isn't something you're really trained to deal with as a bishop. Here's this crying wife and this husband who's saying he's done.

Natasha Helfer [00:05:46] Right.

Janelle [00:05:47] It's hard stuff.

Natasha Helfer [00:05:49] Right. He's trying to reach out to both of you and.

Janelle [00:05:52] Right.

Natasha Helfer [00:05:54] So. So you also mention. And through the years, you've mentioned many kind of, just like you said, you know, lessons and messages or even the fact, I think, you know, you're in your Relief Society presidency right now, and at least in your ward, it seems like you're one of the only ones who's kind of in this position, at least who's active. And just some of the loneliness that comes with that or some of the idea that you're. That idea that you're different, or maybe that you don't fit in the way you want it to, or can you talk about what lessons are hard to listen to and what situations? Just being an active member, what do you face?

Janelle [00:06:44] Oh, I mean.

Natasha Helfer [00:06:47] Right.

Janelle [00:06:48] I have really amazing friends. Maybe that's the difference. Maybe I need to start slumming it. But you're right. All my friends. My friends husbands are our bishop. They're in our stake presidency. They are high counselors. They're good men. And I am the only one in this situation. So I do feel.

Natasha Helfer [00:07:27] In your ward.

Janelle [00:07:29] Right. Like the oddball or the odd man out, you know, talking about dates to the temple or those kinds of things are, you know, I'm not sharing in those. It's not a lot. It's not unlike someone who doesn't have children and what they go through, hearing people and friends talking about the joys of, you know, raising children. So it's very similar to that, I imagine just something that I'm not experiencing. And

Natasha Helfer [00:08:13] people just talk about on a regular basis, just kind of as part of our basic culture.

Janelle [00:08:18] Right. Important, good things that they're involved in. And. And yeah, so those are a little rugged to. Be around or to listen to. But it's. But I'm okay. I don't, you know, I don't. I don't have to get up and leave or anything.

Natasha Helfer [00:08:46] Right.

Janelle [00:08:47] I'm just in a different situation. So I wouldn't not want to hear about those things either. I wouldn't ever want them to feel like they couldn't talk about those things. It's just there's that little twinge or that little pang of. Sadness.

Natasha Helfer [00:09:07] Sure. And what about actual messages that are coming from church itself as far as lessons or programs or. I don't know.

Janelle [00:09:25] I'm pretty okay. I don't think I want to give any lessons on the temple or priesthood right now. I hope that won't always be the case, but those are tender. Those are just kind of topics that I think would be hard for me to stand up and talk about right now as a teacher.

Natasha Helfer [00:09:51] And you're comfortable letting your presidency know that and to tell them that that's a boundary you need to set right now.

Janelle [00:09:59] Yeah. And they're so, really. They're so. They've been. Everyone really has been very kind and very, very aware that there's some things that will be hard for me or some things that, you know, I just can't do. I can't attend a welfare meeting on Sunday before church because I'm the one getting my children ready. So there's just some things that I can't do, and my family comes first. And I've never even had to assert that in any way, even close.

Natasha Helfer [00:10:50] Yeah. I think this is such an important thing to be talking about is. It's just kind of, again, the things that both men and women in your position can hopefully, hopefully communicate to the leaders in their ward, what their limitations are, where they need support, and how they can still serve and be a wonderful part of the ward. I would hate for people in your situation to feel like, well, because I have these limitations, or I do need to choose the church in front of my Family or just those kinds of ideas. That this is not okay to say, no, I can't attend welfare meetings, that it is okay to say those kinds of things that you're needing at a specific time, or it is okay to turn down a talk or a lesson.

Natasha Helfer [00:11:41] Like, I'd love to give a talk, but maybe not on this topic or, you know, and to be able to say those things as part of your self care. Right.

Janelle [00:11:52] Well, I don't think that our leaders want us up there crying or struggling to get through something that we just. That is just too sensitive. And maybe it won't always be that way, but. But for me right now, there are some things that are right.

Talking With the Children About Dad's Disaffection

Natasha Helfer [00:12:10] Okay, so we've talked about your marriage, We've talked about yourself. Let's get to the kids. Which when I was just recently at this Sunstone symposium, It seemed like 80% of the questions directed to both me and John had to do with what do we do with the kids and the struggles, you know, just parenting and when people have a different idea of how to parent or what to teach, how to be honest yet respectful, you know, all these very difficult kind of things to maneuver. So let's get started on how that's been like for the two of you.

Janelle [00:12:56] Okay, what specifically?

Natasha Helfer [00:13:01] Well, let's just start with what you feel, how you guys have come to an agreement about what it is that you're comfortable teaching your children. Like, did he ever, you know, say, well, I don't want my children taught these things that I feel, you know, are lies or untruths? Or did he ever come up and say, well, I want to teach them these things along with other things, you know, how did you guys kind of. Or are you still maneuvering all that?

Janelle [00:13:34] I think we are still maneuvering some of that. I think Rich has been, you know, he. I take the kids to church every Sunday and I, you know, that's just something that I do.

Natasha Helfer [00:13:53] And he's never given you a hard time about that? He's never said, I don't want my kids attending church or no, he, it's.

Janelle [00:14:03] I mean, I know that he would much prefer that we stay home and go, you know, do something, but he realizes that this is important to me. And, you know, I feel like this was, you know, we, our marriage, you know, we started in a certain place and that I don't, I don't know that the disaffected member can just all of a sudden say they can say it, but Rich has never said that.

Natasha Helfer [00:14:44] And like all of a Sudden change all the rules and start giving ultimatums.

Janelle [00:14:50] The basis of your relationship is, you know, formed and, you know, covenants are made and uncertain. There's a certain understanding that comes along with, you know, getting married in the temple and things that, how your life would progress from that point and to all of a sudden because you're changing. To expect everybody else to change is just not really an option. And I think he knows me well enough to know that that would not have gone over on top of, you know, how devastated I was to start saying things along those lines. I'm sure he would prefer that they not.

Janelle [00:15:37] And I think two of our children have been baptized since and he usually, he has taken them aside and has talked to them about some of the things that he thinks, but he's been very clear that this is their choice. And so I really try to take that as a positive.

Janelle [00:16:02] I don't know if there are two children who have really had a black and white choice or two complete choices laid out in front of them prior to their baptism as an 8 year old. And. They are, you know, they completely made that choice to get baptized.

Janelle [00:16:33] I don't want to say Rich wouldn't, didn't support that, but he wanted them to have, you know, a small eight year old level understanding of where he

Natasha Helfer [00:16:42] was coming from and that this is a choice.

Janelle [00:16:46] Right. And. That he feels differently about it now that he doesn't, you know, see things the same way. And I wasn't present during this conversation that he had. It wasn't secretive and knew what was going on and what he was talking to them about, but he needed to have that time to communicate where he was coming from with them. And so that's what he did. And that's one way we have dealt

Natasha Helfer [00:17:29] with kind of a Mormon ritual.

Janelle [00:17:32] Right. I don't know if it's effectively dealing with it, but that's how we have handled that. And I don't think he wasn't disappointed either that they did want to be baptized. He's very respectful of different views and much more so than I am. I've had a harder time. So he's a good example to me in that.

Natasha Helfer [00:18:02] Right. And what about the coming out per se, if you want to call it that. How did your children find out that this was happening? Did you guys sit down and talk to them and say, yeah, dad had this epiphany and he's no longer going to come to church with us, or did you just kind of start behaving differently and they just kind of picked up on things or how have you guys handled that?

Janelle [00:18:28] When he wasn't in the van with us on the way to church, they pretty much noticed that

Natasha Helfer [00:18:37] and would ask you questions.

Janelle [00:18:39] Right. I wasn't really at a stage at that point to be able to. I wasn't really able to talk to them. I mean, I was, you know, your six year old says, where's dad? And I'm just in tears. I can hardly explain. And I would just say, you know, he's not gonna come with us. And they were very sad. The part with my children is the hardest part for me, answering their little questions. And I don't want them missing out on anything. And that's where it affects my children is the hard part for me. So it's a super sensitive area in an already sensitive

Natasha Helfer [00:19:32] situation.

Janelle [00:19:36] So he has come to their baptisms. He was not, he did not baptize them. They wanted, you know, that was their choice. Their first choice would be have been to have their dad baptize them. But he had, you know, a conflict with his personal integrity and not being able to do perform that ordinance, which can respect.

Janelle [00:20:09] But that was pretty, that was pretty rugged to, You know, not have their dad perform that. And you know, the next, you know, people that they requested were people who were also unable because of disaffection to perform that ordinance. And so that was heartbreaking. That was really hard for me. And I finally, you know, we had this discussion so many times and they keep asking if, you know, their dad can baptize them. And I finally just said that, you know, it's.

Janelle [00:20:59] It doesn't necessarily matter who baptized you. Of course it's great when fathers can baptize their children. I have no. Not making that my issue, but I did say to them that Jesus wasn't baptized by his father. And that's not what the important part is. The important part is that you are entering into this promise that you're wanting to make and as a, as a sign that you are willing to follow Jesus. And the most important thing is getting baptized. And so.

Natasha Helfer [00:21:40] Right.

Janelle [00:21:41] But that was just heartbreaking. And I felt, I mean, I feel kind of frustrated sometimes because it's not Rich who's hearing these conversations and having to, you know, he, they would. They talk to him certainly. And they certainly have mentioned it, but I just felt like repeatedly I was dealing with this, you know, how kids questions and the same ones over and over and I'm just continually having to have this salt poured in my wound by, you know, trying to explain or trying to, you know, answer their sincere questions and not always knowing if I'm doing it right without wanting to make them feel bad about their dad. They don't want that at all. I don't want them to have any reason to feel bad about their father. That's so counter. It goes so against what we. What we believe and the value of each family member, but it's hard to answer those questions. So,

Natasha Helfer [00:23:08] yeah, I think one of the things that I probably admire most about your parenting is the honesty that you. You're very forthcoming with your children, appropriately so, you know, for their developmental stages. And I think that's something sometimes that people in these situations struggle with is how honest, you know, do we need to be? And, you know, so I think that's. That is that it's a struggle.

Janelle [00:23:34] Right.

Natasha Helfer [00:23:35] I think you do it very well and.

Janelle [00:23:38] Oh, I don't know.

Natasha Helfer [00:23:39] I think you do. But there's a lot of. I mean, I just, you know, over the years, your children have come up with a lot of different questions, and it sounds like sometimes they even put, you know, their father on the spot or, you know, why won't you do this or that, or how does he deal with that?

Janelle [00:23:57] I think he gets. I mean, poor guy, if you can imagine, a deer in the headlights, because there I am and there they are. And he wants everyone to be happy. He really does. And he is just. There's just no way it can, you know, including himself. He needs to be able to speak truthfully to them. And yet he knows how I'm hurt and how it's hurtful to me. So it's tricky. He tries to answer them without going into too much and just to give them his honest answer in a simplified form.

Natasha Helfer [00:24:40] While, you know, which you support, you support him being, like you said, having a voice, being able to say at least some things.

Janelle [00:24:50] Right. And I'm sure, you know, being respectful of where. What I'm trying to teach them, it's very difficult.

Natasha Helfer [00:24:58] Right.

Janelle [00:24:59] You know, not undermining what, you know, the value that. That I have place on things. It's. It is a huge balancing act. And I'm not sure that, you know, we always know the right thing to say or do in these situations, but.

Natasha Helfer [00:25:21] Right. That was something that was brought up a lot too, at this conference I attended, was this idea of confusing the kids, you know, that how do we. Are we going to confuse the children? I loved a comment of one of the women. I think she's like, of course we're going to confuse the Children. She was very upfront about that. But at the same time, you know, is that something you worry about, or is that something. How do you try to lessen that? Or.

Janelle [00:25:47] I think that, I mean, there are conflicting messages all around us. I, you know, I am really trying not to worry about things down the road a whole lot. I will go crazy. And so I have just decided that I can only do the best I can do and that, you know, I will do all I can to teach them the principles of the gospel that they need to know and understand. And I can't worry about what they eventually choose

Natasha Helfer [00:26:36] their own testimonies.

Janelle [00:26:37] You mean I can't. Like I said, I can do my best to teach them, to give them opportunities to experience the Holy Ghost, to recognize and point that out to them, but I will go crazy, Natasha, if I sit and think and worry about the. All the possibilities, I can't do that.

Natasha Helfer [00:27:09] Right, yeah. And along those same notes, do you see anything positive that could come out of this for the kids? I mean, there is so much fear, right. And so much angst about the unknown. And how's their father's ideas or testimony going to affect my children's ideas? But can you see any positives as well, as far as kind of like you said, the world is full of contradictions and they're going to have to go out in the world. And how could this experience maybe prepare them in that sense?

Janelle [00:27:42] Well, I mean, definitely things that,

Natasha Helfer [00:27:47] I

Janelle [00:27:48] mean, they're getting a little taste of some. Some of the things that they will probably be faced with down the road. You know, I think one thing that some disaffected members that I have spoken with, I mean, one thing was learning some unflattering things about the prophet Joseph Smith and how for some people who held him on such a high pedestal, learning these things was devastating and affected their whole thoughts and feelings and testimony on Joseph Smith. I feel like because of where Rich is at, we've already had occasion to talk about the fact that Joseph Smith was a man, he was not perfect. And so I'm hoping that those things will not be so devastating to them

Natasha Helfer [00:28:49] as they're not going to be taken.

Janelle [00:28:52] They're not just going to be floored by some of these things that we don't really openly talk about in our Sunday settings or a lot of other places. But they will, you know, have some, you know, understanding about some of those things. I hope that they become more tolerant. I hope that they learn compromise and flexibility. I hope that they see those as good Things I hope that they always, you know, they. They know that they have a great dad who loves them. So I don't think they'll ever have to. To question. To question that this has no, you know, no ties. You know, Rich's disaffection with the church has nothing to do with how much he loves them.

Natasha Helfer [00:29:55] Right. I also remember you one time saying something along the lines of, I don't want my children to be perceived kind of like as a special case at church, you know, where they have to feel, like you said, sometimes how you feel an oddball or kind of out of place or. We don't feel.

Janelle [00:30:14] I'm extra needy because, you know, of my circumstances. So I don't want. I mean, we all want to be the capable and, you know, we've got it all together and, you know, who wants to be brought up at welfare meeting, you know, and that's just part of my own pride issues. But this is something, I mean, I can't control. This is not something that, you know, I have any choice in the matter. It is what it is. And I realize that, you know, if we do need to be talked about at welfare meeting or whatever, that it's. I have no doubt that it's lovingly done and for our family's welfare, it's not. You know,

Natasha Helfer [00:31:18] I'd stand with good intentions

Janelle [00:31:19] and not gossipy or whatever, but I don't think people can help but feel, you know, a little sad that this is happening. So there are elements of feeling sorry for me or for us, but I just feel like it's compassionate. It's not. I don't know. I'm not looked down on, I guess. Maybe I am. I don't know it. But I don't feel that way.

Natasha Helfer [00:31:59] Well, that in of itself says a lot. So anything else that you feel you want to share about as far as kids or parenting or.

Janelle [00:32:16] Well, there's lots of things, but you would probably need to ask me specifically. I don't know.

Natasha Helfer [00:32:21] Okay. I can't think of anything specifically. You have great kids, and I think that all of us as parents need to compromise at some level with our spouse as far as how to parent. And this just is a topic that maybe you didn't foresee having to compromise on, but.

Janelle [00:32:43] No. And it. It's by far the hardest aspect of this.

Natasha Helfer [00:32:48] That's the whole issue. Yeah.

Janelle [00:32:50] Is how it affects my children. And that was. And I knew that was going to be the case. You know, I'm fine. I can do what I need to, but when it affects my kids, that's just an entirely different ball game.

Natasha Helfer [00:33:06] Right.

Janelle [00:33:06] And like I said, Rich has been, you know, good at allowing me to. And I even hate using the word allow because, well, you know, me and.

Natasha Helfer [00:33:25] Has been supportive.

Janelle [00:33:27] Has been supportive and I've tried to be supportive of times when, you know, there's a specific thing that he has planned. For example, just a couple weeks ago, he and our son did a long bike ride, 160 mile bike ride. And they did it in a long weekend and they were together and completing the last day of the bike ride on Sunday.

Janelle [00:34:04] And to be honest, it was hard for me. I took my daughters and we were at church and had plans to meet them later that evening so that we could bring them home. But it was hard for me to not have my son. But he was with his father and they were doing something together and memorable and meaningful. And I'm just not going to feel bad about those experiences that he is having with his dad. Do I wish it was different? Absolutely.

Janelle [00:34:44] I just, you know, I think heavenly Father knows the intents of our hearts and he just, he knows. I believe the particular challenge that this is and I believe that there are good things that can happen on Sundays.

Natasha Helfer [00:35:13] Right. Well, it kind of brings to mind my thought always that many times we're asked to do things that you wouldn't think would conflict, but in the end do conflict. You know, classic Adam and Eve, you know, don't eat the fruit, but, you know, let's progress kind of thing. Right.

Janelle [00:35:33] Really, you're supposed to eat the fruit so that children and multiply punish the earth.

Natasha Helfer [00:35:38] Right. So things like that, that I feel like, you know, here you are in a position where you have two good things that you kind of have to choose. You know, this idea of more the classic, you know, we go to church every Sunday type of mentality and how we are to keep the Sabbath day holy. And yet you have this other thing to choose, which is your husband and your family values of, like you said, sharing, you know, things together as a family and giving your children opportunity to develop their relationship with their father in ways that he. That are important to him. Two things that I think, you know, have value and yet there's still a choice to be made. So. Yeah, that's. That's a great example of. Of how there's compromise on both sides.

Janelle [00:36:26] Well, I hope that that's. I hope it's a good example of that because like I said, I completely admit that it's not. It was not my first. It's not what I was initially happy about, but it's. I'm happy to say it did not take me long to realize that this was a good thing that they could do together. And I wasn't going to feel bad

Natasha Helfer [00:36:58] about it, and you weren't going to stand in the way of it. Mm. Mm.

Janelle [00:37:01] I didn't. I put up, if you can imagine, absolutely no fight. I was totally fine and supportive of that time for them to be together.

Natasha Helfer [00:37:18] Right.

Janelle [00:37:23] And I think Rich is respectful of, you know, he tries to recognize that, you know, I feel the need to be active and to be, you know, to my meetings on Sundays.

Natasha Helfer [00:37:39] Right. So alluding to that. That idea that you said on your initial list that you were asking Rich to be respectful of your beliefs and not do the eye rolls and not look down on you, I think this is an issue that comes up with the couples I see a lot, is this idea that the person who has become disaffected is now the enlightened one. Right. They're the intellectual one, or they've seen the.

Advice for Disaffected Spouses and Believing Partners

Janelle [00:38:13] And they've made this huge discovery.

Natasha Helfer [00:38:17] And the rest of us.

Janelle [00:38:18] How can you not see it?

Natasha Helfer [00:38:19] Right. And so, you know, so then there's kind of this idea of almost putting down the spouse or. Yeah. How can you still believe this? This is so stupid, or this is dumb, or, you know, even making it worse, like you're stupid or you're dumb because, you know, you still believe these things. So walk me through a little bit about. Well, first of all, you know, how whether or not that ever really was an issue for you guys, but then even more so, what was it like for you and your own testimony? Because I know that when I speak with a lot of spouses, they kind of have a lot of doubts start, you know, sparking up. And what is this? And some of this information, they weren't aware of either. And how did you deal with some of that?

Janelle [00:39:08] Well, I definitely. I mean, when he came to me with some of this information and wanted me to, you know, know what he was basing his decisions and his feelings on, you know, and I wanted to be supportive, and I wanted to understand more than anything.

Janelle [00:39:30] And so I read. I did a lot of reading, and, you know, some I could get through better than others. Some of it is. It just felt too antagonistic. It was very. There was a feel in the way some of this literature is written.

Janelle [00:39:51] It's anti Mormon literature. And I just felt like after a time that what it boiled down to for me was that I had a Testimony. I had served a mission. I had had experiences with confirmation from the Holy Ghost as to what was true and what was right. And I did not feel good reading these things. It didn't.

Janelle [00:40:29] I mean, I felt like it helped me, you know, recognize and understand where he was coming from. And it helped me. I was still able to love the gospel and not feel I didn't need Joseph Smith to be perfect to love the gospel. And.

Janelle [00:41:05] That's, that's kind of where I haven't been doing a lot of the reading, quite honestly. It was, it's. It was emotional for me to go there. It was more again, pouring salt in the wound like I could not.

Janelle [00:41:21] I was, I was devastated in dealing with how it was affecting my life and the changes that it was bringing without having to heap extra doses on, of spending a lot of time researching and studying and raising little kids and trying to get through this crisis that I was feeling. Does that make any sense?

Natasha Helfer [00:41:54] Oh, yeah. Did you find that he wanted to talk to you about these things a lot or were you guys both able to kind of just say, okay, we have differences of opinion?

Janelle [00:42:03] And yeah, I think there was that. The recognizing that there was just some differences and you know, you, you can't, you can argue these things if you would like to, but, you know, I knew where I stood. I knew, Like I said, I'd had experiences that I could not deny. And. It didn't really, I didn't really need to go into all these books, all this, all this, all the information that is out there.

Natasha Helfer [00:42:49] Right.

Janelle [00:42:50] If you can, if you call it that. I don't know what to call it.

Natasha Helfer [00:42:54] Yeah, some of it information, some of it history, some of it, like you said, is antagonistic. Some of it is just basic. It's just. There's a lot of different, A lot of different things I remember as part of. And I'm assuming it was part of that three month process. Both you and your husband approached me and my husband and wanting us to maybe read some of these things as well, just to have somebody to talk to about these things. That's another maybe, I don't know, maybe cultural phenomenon that happens, that anything that maybe seems anti church is frowned upon and therefore there's not this ability to be open and frank about having these types of discussions within our ward communities. Or are you able to talk about that?

Janelle [00:43:53] I guess I'm remembering that Rich had approached you. I guess I'm not really. I might have been out of that loop a little bit. I'm not really. I have no real experiences that I can.

Natasha Helfer [00:44:13] You don't recall that so much?

Janelle [00:44:15] No.

Natasha Helfer [00:44:18] Yeah. I just remember him having a desire to be able to talk about these things with, you know, his peers and not finding many places to be able to do that. I think my husband did a better job of that than I did as far as getting back to him. I definitely did a lot of reading at that time, too, and some of it I knew, some of it was new as well to me.

Natasha Helfer [00:44:47] I just remember starting a lot of conversations between my husband and I, and also with your husband and us, and even me and you have discussed a lot of these types of things and how we come to terms, you know, still as active, believing members with some of our history and what matters and doesn't matter and all that kind of stuff. But it seems like only among close friends is that more doable. It's not necessarily conversations I would feel comfortable just kind of spurring in Sunday school or.

Janelle [00:45:22] No, it seems like in those settings, it's really only the super safe topics that are, you know, comfortably brought up. That if you truly have, you know, a real question or something you just wonder about or you've heard, that's definitely not the safe place to voice that question. So it is hard. It's hard to talk about it. And we're counseled to, you know, stay away from things that are negative or harmful to our testimonies or, you know, that kind of thing.

Natasha Helfer [00:46:00] Right. Yeah. In fact, I remember speaking with my own bishop at that time, just in passing, mentioning that I was reading some of these books like, no man Knows My History. Or, you know, just basic. Not anything, really, just historical books. And I remember his kind of shy, yeah, why, Sister Parker, are you reading that?

Natasha Helfer [00:46:31] And that's always kind of surprised me, I guess. I have an intellectual, logical father myself who was the reason why we are members of the church. He's the convert. And I remember in the height of the whole 90s fiasco at BYU, where several professors were getting excommunicated and being fired from their positions because of intellectual reasons, things that they were publishing or writing or teaching about that weren't in complete accordance with church teachings, and I remember my father's one comment that has kind of stuck with me. And he said, if our church is true, what are we so afraid of?

Natasha Helfer [00:47:17] Rich's invitation to read what he was reading never scared me. It was more, okay, well, let's just see what all is out there, and let's start figuring all this out and thinking about things. And I've Always taken the advice from the Book of Mormon to be true, that we need to ponder and think and ask and study, and we've been given our brains for a reason. So that's always been my approach. So for me, it was.

Natasha Helfer [00:47:47] It was. I enjoyed Rich's invitation to join him in the intellectual part of his journey through some of our history and questions he had about that. But I don't think that's always the case.

Janelle [00:48:02] Well, I don't think that was the case for me. I certainly did not enjoy his invitation to do that.

Natasha Helfer [00:48:07] Yeah, well, I wasn't married to him,

Janelle [00:48:08] so I think it was too emotional for me. It really. It just was. It was too. I. I was too sad. And quite honestly, there wasn't. I mean, I did, you know, I did talk with friends, like at this meeting that we talked about earlier. I did, you know, I had people who knew, but I didn't have anybody to talk to who had gone through or was going through this. I felt there wasn't anybody for me to share experiences with or to let me know they lived through it and all that. I was just at a much more. It was emotional for me. I couldn't have done that at the same time.

Natasha Helfer [00:48:59] So in a way, you and Rich were in the same position as far as not having access anyway to other people who were feeling and living what you were feeling and living at that moment.

Janelle [00:49:14] Right. And I think that's improved over the last several years. I think there are sites that can help people going through what I'm going through, but I don't believe there was at the time.

Natasha Helfer [00:49:28] Right.

Janelle [00:49:31] I certainly didn't know how. What I was finding was the anti. Type of sites.

Natasha Helfer [00:49:38] Right.

Janelle [00:49:41] Support group for this. And that's not what I was finding.

Natasha Helfer [00:49:49] Yeah. Things like Stay LDS or Faces east, all these kind of sites now that help people kind of through these struggles, or at least have other people who are struggling with the same things, and you can kind of reach out to each other. And I'm assuming these are only about three to four years old. I'm not exactly sure, but.

Natasha Helfer [00:50:09] So, yeah, your situation, I think, happened right before some of this stuff started developing. All right, well, kind of in wrapping up our. Our interview here, I guess I'd like to end kind of on the notes of the idea that others are listening to this who may be struggling with very similar situations as you and Rich did. And maybe what, you know, sounds of advice you could throw out there. So, for instance, if somebody is in Rich's situation and is, you know, realizing that they really no longer have a testimony in the church and they don't have the same feelings that they used to have about it.

Natasha Helfer [00:51:00] What are your thoughts as far as how they can approach or include their spouse in that? You know, what are some things that you feel like Rich did? Well, maybe some things that he didn't do so well that, you know, others could improve on, or can you share some thoughts on that?

Janelle [00:51:19] I will. I'll share. I think we talked about it earlier. You know, he has phenomenal amounts of patience. And so I think that's served both of us well in this situation because I have certainly required that of him because it's taken me. Like we said, it's taken me longer than he expected. You know, he expected some normalcy to return much sooner than I was ready to be. Normal, if you can call it that. So that was extremely helpful. I think just being aware that. Can come as a shock. It's a devastating loss. To be aware of that, to not just simplify it and

Natasha Helfer [00:52:31] minimize it.

Janelle [00:52:32] Minimize it. Right. To recognize that there's a true. True. A true loss there that the other spouse is experiencing. I don't know. Is that.

Natasha Helfer [00:52:53] Yeah. And I think along with that, things. I think things that you said also were not placing ultimatums and allowing you to continue with kind of what your original contract was when he got married, you know, that he didn't make these

Janelle [00:53:08] huge alterations to that or expectations that just because he no longer felt that way, that I, you know, needed to agree or to, you know, abandon ship as well.

Natasha Helfer [00:53:24] Right.

Janelle [00:53:27] And two, I don't know, just that there's a call for some mutual respect that needs to be there.

Natasha Helfer [00:53:45] What about advice you have for the ones who are in your shoes?

Janelle [00:53:53] Well, I think one of the big things that I learned, again, was the. Than not being upset with him for, you know, perceiving that this was something he was doing to me to realize that he was not intentionally trying to hurt me.

John Dehlin [00:54:12] He.

Janelle [00:54:13] So. Something he was going through and to try not to take it personally to. To. I think it's like any other trial that we face, you know, here in this life that we knew and we accept that as part of the plan of salvation, that there are trials that will come into our lives, and whether they be, you know, illness or, you know, there's. There's premature death, there's. There's all kinds of things that we're subject to, and that this is just. This is one of those trials. And. But not having to. There's still. There's there's reasons to stay together. There's reasons to stay a member of the church.

Natasha Helfer [00:55:16] And

Janelle [00:55:19] I guess I feel like it's not any different than any other challenge or trial that we face in this life. They're unexpected. They're not what we would ever choose. But I mean, this is how we're proved. This is how we're proven. And that's kind of how I look at it. And. The alternative to me isn't great. And so I'm going to.

Natasha Helfer [00:55:55] Meaning the alternative of divorce or of what?

Janelle [00:55:58] Divorce or Levy, you know, not having the gospel in my life or my children's life. That is completely. That's just not an acceptable alternative as far as I'm concerned. And so we endure. We keep plugging away and we do the best that we can. And I just have that faith that Heavenly Father knows our circumstances and he knows. What will be for our benefit and that it will, it will work out.

Natasha Helfer [00:56:49] Right. Well, this is a good segue then, to probably my last question or questions is how then has this, if you want to call it trial, and with the idea of kind of in our Mormon culture that we learn from our trials or our trials have a purpose, because everything, I guess, in this life has a purpose. How has this been maybe a challenge or a growth process for you individually? What has this affected your testimony? How has this affected your relationship with Heavenly Father or your relationship even with yourself?

Silver Linings, Testimony, and Eternal Family Hopes

Janelle [00:57:38] You know, I think the things that have come from it that are good, I guess, is the confidence that I've had in just knowing, I guess now what needed to be done and that I would be the one needing to do it and stepping up to the plate and taking that on and knowing that I can do that.

Natasha Helfer [00:58:08] So almost self empowerment?

Janelle [00:58:11] I think so. I think, and I think I'm just so grateful for my mission experience because, you know, I have experiences to rely on and not just for my mission. But certainly that opportunity was extremely helpful to me. I'm just so glad that I could do that. And, you know, I sometimes hear other women say, you know, I leave that up to my husband because he served a mission or he's a great teacher, he served a mission or whatever. And I feel like, not that I feel like I'm a great teacher because I don't feel that way, but I have my own experiences that I can rely on.

Natasha Helfer [00:59:01] So it's almost, it feels to me like just a heightened, maybe even self esteem or self confidence or something along the lines of, I am woman, hear me roar. I can do this too.

Janelle [00:59:16] I'm not dependent on anybody for

Natasha Helfer [00:59:22] the

Janelle [00:59:22] things that I need, things that. Some of the things that I value most, being available to my children, I am capable and able to do that. I think just the. It's taught me that flexibility that I've needed. I think I'm pretty rigid and have things like, things a certain way, pretty annoyingly idealistic, and have, even, if you can imagine, been called a perfectionist. And so being able to.

Janelle [01:00:09] I've been forced to let some of that go. And in an effort to, you know, maintain a relationship and to have a happy marriage and a happy home, which really are. Those are my most important things. Those are the things I value the most.

Janelle [01:00:28] I think it's also taught me an incredible lesson in unconditional love, because, I mean, at one point, you know, I felt like. And Rich probably felt this way, too, that my love for him was based on his membership in the church and how wrong that really is, is of me.

Janelle [01:01:03] And I'm ashamed of that feeling. And it didn't take me long to realize that wasn't right. It wasn't good, it wasn't the way I should be. I think that was in the depths of some pretty sad times, but.

Janelle [01:01:30] But just learning and knowing. I don't know. I've always heard that term unconditional love, and. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I thought. I've not had a hard time loving anyone in particular. But through this trial, I mean, it was. It's hard to love unconditionally when someone has hurt you. Whether it was, you know, intended or purposeful or directed at me or not. The bottom line was that he had done something that hurt me terribly. And so.

Natasha Helfer [01:02:10] And now you're supposed to be loving and affectionate and all those things, even through your hurt.

Janelle [01:02:17] Right. And so really just valuing him as a person and knowing who he is, whether or not he realizes or remembers or knows who he is, and just treating him in the way that my savior would want him to be treated, he's deserving of that, and. That's what I want to. To do. That's how I want to be.

Natasha Helfer [01:02:55] Right.

Janelle [01:02:56] That's why, you know, I am trying to do the things I'm trying to do.

Natasha Helfer [01:03:10] And when you feel like it's all overwhelming and you're ready to give up, do you ever feel that way?

Janelle [01:03:18] You know, it's been a while. Again, like I said, I don't think the alternative is that great. There are beautiful truths that are contained here that I'm not really finding anywhere else. And so no.

Natasha Helfer [01:03:44] Can you talk about that a little bit as far as what would you say are the basis of your own testimony? What are the truths that keep you, I guess, enduring or holding to the rod or however we want to?

Janelle [01:04:00] Well, I guess, I mean, like so many, I don't know that I'm unique in this, but I mean just the eternal nature of families and I mean, who doesn't want to hold on to that? Everything associated with the temple and redeeming. Our ancestors who have gone before us, you know, where else is that found? Just the practical day to day things. The food storage, the family home, evening, just all those things. I think it's so,

Natasha Helfer [01:05:00] It's.

Janelle [01:05:04] They're things that help our families and I just find them amazing in their simplicity, the power they have to bless our lives.

Natasha Helfer [01:05:24] With the whole eternal nature thing. I've heard many spouses in this situation doubt now that they can be an eternal family, that somehow, because the husband or wife has chosen a different road or a different path, that somehow threatens that idea of eternal unity. What are your thoughts about that? Do you worry about that or struggle with your ideology around that?

Janelle [01:05:54] I think I have worried about that before and I've just decided that I'm not going to because why am I going to spend energy worrying about something that I have no control over? And that really, in the end I have complete faith that my family is an eternal family. We were married in the temple, our children are born in the covenant and they are ours. And I just, I have to believe and have to hope that this loving Heavenly Father will, that there will be all things taken into consideration.

Natasha Helfer [01:06:54] Right.

Janelle [01:06:55] I am just not going to entertain any thought of my family not being eternal because of something I had nothing to do with and no control over.

Natasha Helfer [01:07:14] Right. And that we don't fully understand all of that.

Janelle [01:07:22] Right. And I don't, you know, I don't know, you know, I don't know everything about my husband's background or his, you know, personal challenges or trials. And Heavenly Father does, or even the

Natasha Helfer [01:07:41] way his brain is put together and the chemicals that affect him versus you.

Janelle [01:07:49] Right. He for some reason was blessed with a very analytical, he's very, he is very reasonable. He reasons through things. He, he thinks about them in a completely different way than I do. But that, that, that's who he is. And he, there's a reason he's like that and it's not an error. It's not a, you know, he's a freak. He's not, he, you know, that's, that's a strength and it can be a weakness. And I just, I don't know. It would be ultra devastating to think along those lines. And so I'm choosing not to.

Natasha Helfer [01:08:40] And I really support you on that. That's something that I encourage the couples I work with to also not go down or make assumptions that they know whether or not, well, my husband left the church or my wife left the church. So therefore, I know this is no longer a possibility for us. I don't think we know anything regarding those kinds of things, and it's not our place to know those things. And those kinds of assumptions can only do damage.

Janelle [01:09:15] Well, I think they cause you to prematurely throw in the towel or give up. And who is the author of that hopelessness or that, you know, halting our progression? That's not our Heavenly Father.

Natasha Helfer [01:09:31] Yeah.

Janelle [01:09:33] It doesn't come from him. I think we just keep, just, just keep moving on.

Natasha Helfer [01:09:44] Yeah.

John Dehlin [01:09:47] Yeah.

Natasha Helfer [01:09:47] I think my favorite scriptures have to do with the idea of not fearing. Thou shalt not have fear.

Janelle [01:09:56] Well, and hope and fear cannot exist in the same, you know, the same.

Natasha Helfer [01:10:05] In the same nanosecond anyway.

Janelle [01:10:08] Right, Right.

Natasha Helfer [01:10:09] They can probably exist in the same thought, but.

Janelle [01:10:13] Right. But really.

Natasha Helfer [01:10:16] Right.

Janelle [01:10:17] There are two authors there that you cannot mesh together.

Natasha Helfer [01:10:25] Yes. Well, Janelle, thank you so much for allowing me to interview you today and for sharing so many of your wonderful thoughts and struggles and strengths and weaknesses and, you know, the ways that you have kind of come to terms with this in your life that it's just been so informative and useful. And I hope that many people will enjoy hearing this as much as I've enjoyed interviewing you.

Janelle [01:10:57] Thank you. And you're welcome.

John Dehlin [01:10:59] Thank you for joining us today on Mormon Stories. To comment on this episode or to discuss it with others, please check us out online@mormonstories.org if you want to find other friends, family members, former missionary companions, or ward members who approach Mormonism like you, consider adding me, John Dehlin, as your Facebook friend. This may seem like a strange idea, but many of my closest friends have discovered that they are not alone in their thoughts or feelings or family or even ward situation through discovery, mutual Facebook friends. Finally, to keep Mormon stories alive, please consider a donation@mormonstories.org music on this episode was provided by Clayton and Sky Pixton. Still all my song shall be Nearer

Janelle [01:12:00] my go to thee Nearer my go to Nearer to thee.

Part 1 of 2 · Ep. 207Download MP3Listen on Spotify Part 2 of 2 · Ep. 208Download MP3Listen on Spotify

A supporter is worth a thousand followers

Your generous donations ensure we can continue to provide support for those transitioning. Help us keep these essential discussions alive and accessible to all by making a donation today.

similar episodes

90 Responses

  1. I really liked part 1 of this podcast (haven’t finished the second part yet), because Janelle’s husband sounds almost exactly like me. I was definitely sad to learn about the true origins of the Mormon Church, but it wasn’t really devastating. It was kinda like shrugging my shoulders and saying, “Yeah, I shouldn’t be too surprised by this. Well, that’s a relief. Let’s move on.” And I was never really too excited about callings and participating in the Church to begin with.

    I thought it was interesting that Janelle believes that had her husband been more devoted to the “primary answers” (e.g. pray, read his scriptures, go to church, etc.) that he might have avoided a crisis of faith. Janelle, please be assured that those things would not have likely saved your husband from the historical issues that exist in Mormonism. In fact, in my limited observation, usually the Peter Priesthoods that are doing everything right tend to fall the hardest. Not that they don’t fall, but they fall the hardest because they go from two extremes – from total devotion to belief, to total devastation, resentment, and various stages of disbelief. For people like your husband and me (i.e. people persuaded most by reason and logical thinking), no amount of home teaching, prayer, Book of Mormon reading, or Church attendance would overcome the fact that, for example, Joseph Smith married teenagers or other people’s wives. Just as Janelle’s husband would likely have had a crisis of faith with any Mormon wife, I think he probably would have had a crisis of faith regardless of his performance of the primary answers.

  2. On several occasions, Janelle mentioned that she doesn’t expect her church leaders to be perfect. I think this comment is mentioned as an opposing viewpoint from her husband, who allegedly requires perfection. This is a strawman argument, and I doubt that Janelle’s husband actually requires perfection from current or past church leaders. I’ve never seen any disaffected Mormon who required perfection from their leaders and know of no Mormon who left the Church because a leader fell short of perfection in some small manor. Indeed, perfection is not the standard disaffected Mormons require leaders to uphold. Rather, I’ve noticed that many disaffected Mormons are generous with Church leaders and are fine with mistakes.

    What I cannot accept is when leaders use the name of the Lord to take advantage of other people (either financially or sexually). There’s a big difference between a “whoops, I made a bad call there, shouldn’t have done that” kind of imperfection and outright lies, sexual manipulation, and even justified murder in the name of the Lord, kind of imperfection. It’s the difference between normal human nature, and immoral acts what would get one excommunicated in today’s church.

  3. I listed to most of the mormonstories podcast and this is the first one I didn’t want to finish. Part 1 was enough for me. It was so gloomy and sad. Both Natasha and Janelle were downright melancholy. I would love to know what Janelle thinks about her husbands doubts about the church’s truthfulness. Does she think his concerns are all bunk or does she acknowledge and validate any of his doubts that there are serious flaws in church history and practices. Acknowledging the flaws doesn’t mean you have to loose your all of your testimony or give up church, its just being honest about the history and finding a way to move beyond it. Although, some cant I admit.
    I feel for Janelle’s sadness but “men are that they might have joy” right. Find the joy in living again. I’m sorry if in Part 2 you got over your immense sadness and disappointment and found joy again. I just couldn’t listen anymore.

  4. I’m only half way through this podcast. Very disturbed by what I’m listening to. I can’t imagine that Ms. Parker wasn’t raising the issues regarding love between human beings, familial love, etc. What comes first, Church or Relationships? The church must NOT be in bed with the couple. Love comes first, character and ethics can exist without organized religion. A third party in marriage is a strange combination.

    If Janelle wants a different husband, then let her pursue that and good luck with that replacement husband, especially with her children not born of that relationship. Why would Janelle want to build a camp with ward members about her husband’s decision. “These other women”
    is very telling. They seem to be more important than the father of her children. I hope the second half of this podcast changes. Otherwise,
    I would STRONGLY suggest that couples in the same boat get a non-Mormon counselor in working through these problems.

  5. I made the effort to listen to the second half of this podcast. My feeling of concern continued. Why weren’t any of the hard questions asked. What if Janelle’s children decide against missions, temple marriage, join a different faith community, go with their father’s withdrawal from Mormonism? I hear things like “Not having gospel in life completely unacceptable,” “I need to step up to the plate…” What different does food storage, and FHE’s and genealogy make a hundred years from now? Especially Janelle’s “MY SAVIOR” comment. Seriously? I thought Christ was OUR Savior.” “Though millions have come, their is still room for one… yes there’s room at the Cross.”

    I has a dear first cousin who married a faithful Jewish man. They became leaders in a national “Jewish/Christian organization. They had the most amazing fulfilling life together. He left her protected, in a wonderful secure situation, thru his hard work. Their children have
    great memories of the unique faIth vision they grew in. Their daughters are Christian, their grandchildren are Jewish. Shalom!

    Overall, scale of 1-10, maybe a 3 on this podcast. Life is to short to cry through… look around at real pain sometime.

  6. I’m finding the comments so far interesting and of course, saddened by those who did not find this podcast useful.
    At the same time, I want to reiterate my goals for my part of this series as that of sharing stories that are representative within our LDS culture – on all ends of the spectrum. My friend’s experience is not uncommon and neither are her feelings. Would it have been more “therapeutic” of me to minimize her feelings and tell her to “get on” with her life? Being unable to validate anothers’ position is the number one way we create gridlock and polarization. It’s interesting that this doesn’t seem to be the approach many here on Mormon Stories think should be taken towards those facing issues that the audience tends to resonate more with. So, only those we disagree with should “move on” quickly and in a non-whiny tone? Should Mormon Stories only be a place for those who do not believe the church is true? Is it really “Mormon Stories” then? How is the husband divorcing her for having a hard time with his disaffection any better than her divorcing him for leaving? And isn’t the bigger part of the story that they haven’t divorced? That through this challenge they have found ways to support and love one another?

    I would hope that this audience can understand the value of being able to look at both sides of the story – making it more likely that we can empathize, offer support and help all involved to make decisions that will enrich their lives. If listening to this woman makes you this uncomfortable, what is it then that you can look at within yourself and your own intolerance?

    I will also clearly state that my role on this podcast is that of interviewer – not therapist.

    1. Natasha, I’ve been a faithful unbeliever for around 5 years and my story is similar to your guest’s.  My wife is fully committed to the church and has struggled with my disbelief.  My story is a little different than Janelle’s in that I continue to attend church with my wife and 5 young children.  I attend because I’m fully committed to our relationship and staying home would add an extra burden on my wife.  Perhaps I will stop attending when the kids are older.  I’m open about this and it scares my wife.

      Janelle has a lot of courage and I needed to hear her story.  Her and my wife have a lot in common.  Janell’s story showed me that the journey ahead is going to be tough.  Asking Janelle to “move on” is like asking us to “man up” and keep going to church.  This is what me promised to do when we got married in the temple, right?  I don’t know what the answer is.

      With all struggles that most couples have to work through, it’s too bad religion has to be one of them.

    2. Natasha, I’m also glad you did this podcast. At times, it made me feel a little upset, especially when Janelle said, “I had to remind myself that he is still of worth…”, like that was ever in question? One of the pet peeves of mine in Mormon culture is this phrase I hear so often, “He’s not a member of the church, but he’s still a good person”, and this sounded like an extension of that myopic disease I see so prominent in the LDS culture.

      It was helpful to get a little better understanding of what my thoughts are going through my wife’s head right now. I wish I could just show her what I see, but it just comes across as offensive, and belittling to her faith (which we once shared), so I digress.

      Losing my true belief in the LDS church has been really hard on me, I WISH there were better answers, I wish that science, archaeology, and egyptology made findings compatible with early LDS church history claims. I WISH there were an explanation, that there were a true church on the earth, that God did speak through prophets and apostles, that it were all true. If it were, I would be in it immediately, because it would be so amazing.

      The most tragic thing is that it’s a fairy tale. It’s really a let-down when you peak behind the curtain. I can empathize with those who have no desire to study out the “non-faith promoting” (put nicely) issues of the church, and I admit I have no desire to break someone from their faith. I even catch myself, at times, feel the pull of cognitive dissonance and say, “I don’t really care if Joseph Smith translated the book of Mormon or not, I believe it’s true.” It’s very attractive, when contrasted against the hurt caused by disaffection (and perhaps equally as much as the way the believers’ religious views contribute to this hurt), the prospect of having someone else baptize your children, being left out of Mormon temple ceremonies. Sometimes, I think to myself, “why does it all matter? What matters is happiness, not truth”.

      And now I’m rambling.

      1. (not fare to be critical of Janelle and not point out anything good.)

        I liked how she realized that her husbands disaffection was not a worthy cause for divorce, that she realized that he was a good man, not abusive, not an adulterer, etc.

        And she could have meant the “he’s still of worth” comment in a different way… and it just came across bad.

        And ugh… that she had to explain to people what was going on with her husband… I’d gently apply “none of your d*mn business”, here.

    3. Thank you. .

      It is always interesting to me that those disaffected want tolerance for themselves, yet when we that still believe share our feelings and we want to be understood it is difficult to be given tolerance for us.

      Thank you.

  7. It’s so sad to see what our modern Mormon culture has done to our women. We used to have women who could push a handcart through the frozen desert landscape without any problem. Now we have weepy women who fall apart because, “he isn’t there in there mini-van with us.” Boo-hoo. Life doesn’t always give us the things we want. I would be more impressed if the podcast showed a woman who respected her husband choice, but nevertheless went forward with her own faith, without all the histrionics and insistence on victimization.

  8. It may come across like I’m being defensive here, but I’m not.

    1) I really, really enjoyed this interview.
    2) I think Natasha does a great job.
    3) I think that Janelle is a true-believer, and I knew that her perspective would trouble some disaffected folks, but I did not expect disrespectful comments (like the few I had to delete). I think Janelle deserves credit for coming on the show, and being honest about her thoughts/feelings. I also found her to be thoughtful, sincere, likable, etc.
    4) I’m kinda disappointed that folks can’t stretch to appreciate perspectives…even when different from their own. At a minimum, I’m sad that folks can’t express differing beliefs without being insulting.

  9. As a more or less disaffected Mormon I COMPLETELY applaud Janelle’s courage in doing the interview. Yes, I may wish for her that she eventually can come to terms with a few things on a different level, but SO WHAT! Don’t we each deserve the time and opportunity to grow and evolve in our our unique time and way? Moreover, I would like to see how the individuals who have posted disrespectful comments would do being interviewed for a podcast. Are you so articulate that you can explain all of the myriad complexities of your being and thought processes on the spot every time, especially in a public forum? Given me break! Have a little compassion!

    I think Natasha did a great job with the interview. The second part does demonstrate a much more positive perspective on things, and I applaud Janelle for the many forward-thinking and enlightening things she did have to say–especially the point in Part 2 where she argued against divorce because that would imply “conditional love”. Given the social pressures that Janelle has no doubt faced to look more strongly at things like divorce, we should be encouraging her for the brave things she has done and the ways she has made great strides on her own. I also completely agree with John D’s comments. Keep it up to both of you, John and Natasha. We should be seeking to capture the diversity out there–just as this interview, and the previous podcast on this topic do.

    Last thought to those with disrespectful comments: Please consider pausing a little more before your speak, and please consider applying the golden rule a little more. Wouldn’t you expect/want a little compassion?

  10. Gosh, concrete evidence that MSP is much alined with traditionalist Mormonism. As BKP’s comments regarding gays were audited and changed for the official record of General Conference, even so important comments are eliminated by the powers that be concerning this particular podcast. I very much liked the earlier podcast that Nastasha did with the gay married father. I loved it for the level of healing that was obvious in his life. His discourse was beautifully delivered. Nastasha’s interview was near flawless.

    I was very troubled by this podcast, but the “martyrdom” level, five and half years after her husband asked for understanding and suggested a transitional boundary. I can’t imagine moving through life in tears. We are not talking death here, no one has died. Are the children of this couple exposed to self-degradation? I pray happy days and good experiences for this family, for times when religion is forgotten and love effulgent is elevated. After all, love is the sweet mystery of life. Church is a parking lot we pull into on Sundays.

  11. I for one am enjoying this podcast and am grateful to Janelle for talking about her issues so openly. This is an incredible difficult situation for her I am sure and to open up and talk about it should be applauded. One of the amazing things about Mormon Stories is that there is a variety of stories, several different points of view.

    I agree with many of the post when people say there is a certain level of arrogance among TBMs and Church Leaders, but there is an equal portion on the side of those that feel they know better and that TBMs just haven’t figured it out yet.

  12. First off thanks to Janelle for sharing a highly emotional, personal story. Not easy to do, I’m sure.

    I find it telling, though, that in response to the question of how Janelle respects her husband’s beliefs the answer is silence, followed by the answer that despite what he believes God loves him. So the respect is that she understands he is wrong and what she believes is right?

    I understand the TBM world view and this exactly how she is supposed to feel. I think this is an example of how the church’s teachings are a poor foundation for marriages and spiritual testimonies. In the husband’s case his testimony was based on “facts” that turned out to be not true, so he was set up for failure. Now the marriage itself is in jeopardy because the church’s orthodox teachings regarding eternal marriage. The whole system is set up for failure unless everyone involved manages to insulate themselves from the real issues of the church, and the church has no safety net for when this doesn’t happen other than divorce. There is no middle ground. Either you are in or you are out.

    I’m grateful that my wife watched the “Why they leave” video. She respected my new beliefs by acknowledging that there are real problems with the church and there is more than black and white in the world.

  13. Just finished listening to part 1 of this podcast. I could feel so much what Janelle was saying. By the end, when she shared about her group that she shared with, I was so jealous. I am the one who is no longer a believer in my marriage and family. I am a woman and love to talk and love to work together with others love to laugh and love to share. My unbelief was not welcome. I had NO ONE to share my situation with except my husband. I wish I had felt so loved, wanted, needed, and a part of the RS sisters that I just knew they would want to know the truth and would share that burden. It just wasn’t so. I had only one person who came to me and WANTED to know what was going on. Those that I shared with one on one did NOT really want to know. I was NOT sharing historical things or anything about the gospel being wrong, simply that I did not believe it and had not believed it for over 10 years. Just being honest and open. they really did NOT want to know. I think it is fabulous that Janelle was able to share and the ladies were able to love and hear and share.

    I also like how she could look back and see that some of her ways of seeing her situation were tainted by her pain, shock, and fear of the new life she would be walking into without the support of her husband as she had always imagined.

    Good job Janelle! And I already love your husband. I love how he supported you in your trial. My husband has done the same for me even though he is the one losing a believing wife. He would do ANYTHING to assist me in being happy and secure in my spiritual life, including taking me to other belief systems and fellowships of humans supporting one another. You have a good husband and so do I.

  14. When I was listening to the podcast, I am reminded how hard it is to be an individual in the church, and use agency and not be judged. Not all men want priesthood responsibilities, or who want to be teaching lessons, or to be a bishop someday etc. I would say that most men found their missions socially difficult. Same kind of issues for women…some do not want children or to go to enrichment meeting. So, it does seem to be about orthodoxy. “the Kingdom of God or nothing.”..This is how you use your agency if you want to make good choices…

    I have known men who do all they are supposed to do, all the boxes are checked, but they have not been “good” men. It would be interesting to do an experiment, and to take 20 married couples, and have them live their lives and marriages outside of mormonism for a year. Take the “church” element out of it…the “have to’s…the going to church all of the time, the family nights, the family prayers, the callings, and see what would happen. Take the Bishop and everybody else out of the equation..maybe husband and wives wouldn’t be so disappointed in each other and worried about all the things they aren’t doing. The marriages would be about each other, their needs—not the churches. Perhaps a family would want a religious influence, but in way that would less intrusive.

    In some ways, the way the church and the family functions, is counter productive to me. It seems to just zap and deplete what is already inside of people.Some people might find it difficult to function without the structure and organization that the church provides.

    If you are born into the church, and find out that it is not for you, what do you do? Get a divorce? Be reminded often that you just are not measuring up to your covenants and putting your family in Eternal peril?

    There has got to be a better way for the church to support those who wish to worship a different way or leave the church. I appreciate the podcast, but it does lay bare, the irony that the church is first in our lives and expectations, and the principles and habits it takes to form solid marriages and relationships often aren’t given time or priority.

  15. I have only listened to the first part of the interview, but these episodes are a heaven-send for me right now. Just last night my wife and I met with two other couples who are somewhat unorthodox like I am, and we started to talk about the church and what we thought, and my wife was obviously not enjoying the conversation whatsoever. I know she is uncomfortable, yet she doesn’t want to come across as selfish or upset about our situation of me changing my beliefs on her. I was feeling a bit discouraged, so when I saw these podcasts, I was so glad because I could get a perspective from someone who actually still believes strongly in the church.

    The first episode was very well done. Thank you Natasha and Janelle. There is nothing wrong with what Janelle is saying, or what she is feeling. She is not just feeling it because the church has programmed her that way. She is a person with real emotions and feelings, and they are not less valid because she is a true believer. I think some of the listeners could learn from her experience of letting her emotions get in the way of more down-to-earth thinking, because they obviously can’t distinguish between her telling her story, and things that she may have thought or felt, and the difficulty of it all, with just sitting around and griping about how awful life is, which is what several people made it sound like this interview was like. She doesn’t have a right to be depressed about her husband’s disaffection, but these listeners are all depressed about one podcast. The irony is thick.

    Anyway, thanks again. I am so happy to have this perspective, and I respect Janelle tremendously for sharing it. I hope she doesn’t read or can ignore the anger and animosity because some people (like me) really need to hear this story.

  16. Thank you Janelle for sharing your very personal feelings with us. It is hard to hear how sad you remain about your husband’s disaffection because the hopes I have for my own family — that they will ‘get over it’ and move on are, I think, unrealistic. My mother tells me that she can hardly think of me without crying right now and I know it may be that way for a long time — from her perspective she has lost a daughter (eternally) and possibly some of her grandchildren as well. Of course that makes her sad. But I wish she could see the happiness and peace I now feel. I wish she could share them with me.

    I really liked hearing about your gathering of Relief Society sisters. It makes a lot of sense that you would reach out for help with your grief and your children’s spiritual needs. I think it is always best that we address our needs and sorrows head on. Obviously they care both about you AND your husband.

  17. Beautiful! Thanks Janell, Thanks Natasha. I loved your reiteration, above, Natasha, that this podcast is about Mormon Stories…all kinds of Mormon Stories! I welcome all the different perspectives that are had within Mormonism and I think Janelles perspective is unique to her yet common within the whole broad disaffection process. It’s important to understand Janelle and those like her and to try and walk in her shoes for a few hours.

    I relate so much to you Janell. My husband once announced to me his disaffection and I remember that “rug” that was ripped out from under me as well. It was very emotional going back there with you. What a strong woman you are! Good luck to you in your continued journey. Once again, Thank you to you both.

  18. I would like to thank Janelle for her courage in sharing this personal story. It struck me to hear her how similar her feelings and devastation are to mine even though we come from different sides of the fence. You could have easily taken her words during that painful time period of learning her husband’s apostasy, and replaced her with me as the disaffected wife of a believing husband. Learning the history of our Prophets and church left me devastated, and as a mother I also mourned the loss of raising our children with the life plan Mormonism provides. Like Janelle, it was the most painful experience of my life and many tears were shed. I loved my religion and church. (and still love many parts of it)

    I would like to echo both of Jason’s comments and add that I never expected perfection from church Prophets. Their personal sins do not affect my salvation or testimony. It’s when their immoral behavior was preached as God’s word and when foundational doctrines were changed under the guise of “continuing revelation” that my faith in Prophets was damaged.

  19. Only 15 minutes in to Episode 207, but have a quick comment:
    ———————————
    Janelle:

    There is a clearly defined reason why your husband probably didn’t feel any urgency to attend church (when he was a believer). For most priesthood holders, LDS service are awful (not even close to spiritually, emotionally, or intellectually uplifting).

    First, you start with a sacrament meeting. The “lively” hymns sound like a funeral march. And the “reverent” hymns are unbearable. The talks are OK at best, but bad more often then not. This past Sunday, I probably saw 15 people messing around with their mobile phones (the Internet) during Sacrament Meeting. I at least try to show the speakers respect, but I can’t fault these people.

    Moving along… If you are lucky, you have a decent Sunday School teacher and class (if you aren’t busy with a calling). And then you end the day with Priesthood, a 45 minute exercise in frustration. The scene in “The R.M.” that shows an Elders Quorum isn’t an exaggeration. If anything, the movie takes it easy on the typically EQ.

  20. One question I would ask Janelle is if she went through a stage where she was bitter and, well, loathed her husband. It seems that she is now past that, if she ever was that way. My wife would tell a similar story regarding my disaffection, but she is terribly bitter and still talks to me like I am garbage. We haven’t had any husband / wife type relations in over a year, either, probably as a direct result of her loathing.

    I don’t try to convince her of anything, but she insists that I fill her in without really filling her in (in other words, she doesn’t want to hear anything against the church, but she wants to know how I feel about everything). Whenever she insists that we have this talk, which happens several times a week, she is really quite horrible to me. She always prefaces it with “you have ruined my life, you are destroying our family, I’ll never be happy again”. I haven’t figured out how to have such a discussion, so I just say nothing, which infuriates her even further.

  21. Thanks to Janelle for sharing her story. The most significant part for me personally was when she acknowledged how wrong it was to base her love for her husband on his membership in the LDS church. Unfortunately, there are far too many stories (mine included) where this does not happen. The vast majority of people who leave Mormonism do so because they have integrity (the opposite of hypocrisy), a concept the LDS church claims to value. We leave because we were taught to be honest and truthful in everything we do. I know many people who left after much study that was motivated purely by the desire to be a more faithful Mormon. In many of these cases, “anti-Mormon literature” was never even part of the equation for the very reason Janelle mentioned – it is discouraged by LDS leadership. Church friendly publications like The Journal of Discourses or The History of the Church reveal things about Mormonism that are very troubling to many who later leave. These sources are often the proverbial “first thread” we unknowingly pull on that begins to unravel the rest of the sweater.

    I loved what Natasha said about there not being anything to worry about if the Mormon church is true. Numerous Mormon leaders agree with her:

    George Albert Smith: “If a faith will not bear to be investigated; if its preachers and professors are afraid to have it examined, their foundation must be very weak.” (Journal of Discourses, Volume 14, Page 216)

    Dr. Hugh Nibley: “The Book of Mormon can and should be tested. It invites criticism.” (An Approach to The Book of Mormon, 1957, p. 13)

    Brigham Young: “Take up the Bible, compare the religion of the Latter-day Saints with it, and see if it will stand the test.” (Journal of Discourses, Volume 16, p. 46, 1873)

    Orson Pratt: “Convince us of our errors of Doctrine, if we have any, by reason, by logical arguments, or by the Word of God and we will ever be grateful for the information and you will ever have the pleasing reflections that you have been instruments in the hands of God of redeeming your fellow beings.” (The Seer, p. 15)

    Joseph Fielding Smith: “Mormonism, as it is called, must stand or fall on the story of Joseph Smith. He was either a prophet of God, divinely called, properly appointed and commissioned, or he was one of the biggest frauds this world has ever seen. There is no middle ground.” (Doctrines of Salvation, Page 188)

  22. Janelle,
    Thank you for your willingness to share this personal story. I too am experiencing some of the doubts your husband has found troubling about the church. I feel so fortunate to be married to a man who has been patient and supportive as I sort through this very real heartbreak that I am experiencing as the “doubter”. I found your response to your husband to be honest and respectful and I don’t understand the harsh comments that have been directed at you. I see myself as the “game changer” and am frankly astonished and grateful that my husband hasn’t made this a deal breaker. I think there is plenty of influence, both doctrinal and cultural in the church, to imply that it would be perfectly understandable for you and my husband to cut your losses and walk away. So, I applaud anyone in this circumstance for their willingness to choose their marriage and let God sort out the details.

  23. I have a general question for Henri, Wes Cauthers, and all others (who are in a similar situation):

    1) Would your disaffection be less severe if the LDS Church didn’t make the truth claim that it does. What if the LDS stance was more similar to the CoC? Or in other words, did you feel betrayed by the half-truths, and did these feelings of betrayal exacerbate your disaffection?

    2) Would your disaffection be less severe if the LDS Church didn’t ostracize those that are not literal TBMs?

    3) Would your disaffection be less severe if you felt as though you could express an opinion at an LDS service without fear of retribution (Example: expressing concern over the LDS Church’s stance on homosexuality.)?

    4) Did you enjoy Sunday service before your disaffection? Or did you go simply because you believed it was true so you needed to be at church?

    5) How many you would change your opinion if Thomas S. Monson and the rest of the First Presidency came out with a statement such as this:

    “We know Jesus Christ lives because we have seen HIM with our own eyes… touched HIM with our hands… and been in HIS council. Our experience is identical to Joseph Smith’s. Our experience is identical to those who saw HIM during the Meridian of Time. It is the same testimony shared by Lehi, Nephi, Moses, Mohonri, Adam, Noah, and many other prophets from the past who have seen HIM. We testify that HE LIVES! He loves each of HIS children. We testify of this. HE revealed HIMSELF to us after much prayer and fast. HE revealed HIMSELF and gave us council for HIS Church… and the direction that we must travel. We will reveal HIS message as time permits. But again, it is our testimony to all mankind that HE LIVES!”

    Would this be enough for you?

    1. Such good questions. My disaffection would have been very much less severe with the conditions you named. I loved church so much, but as soon as I started having questions, I finally saw that I was in a prison. It hurt so much to go through it alone and not be able to ask questions without reproach. My stake president treated me like I was dirt and he didn’t even know me! # 5 wouldn’t change anything, because it would just be their word, and wouldn’t undo the other things that disprove the church. I still would love to be involved if the church could “expand the tent” a bit to welcome me.

  24. Janelle and others dealing with this crisis or something similar,
    Thank you for being honest about your feelings. I do in part feel your pain – both for my own feelings about the Church since I’ve learned more about our history (which is actually pretty ugly and very difficult to process) and for my wife’s feelings that sound pretty close to your husband’s feelings about the Church.

    For me, I try to keep it simple (as we, as a family, are trying to navigate this crisis):
    #1 – I believe that regardless of whether the Church is true or not I must honor the commitment I made both spiritually and civily to my wife, and to my children the second they were born.
    #2 – My wife and children come first before anybody or anything and I believe Heavenly Father will forgive me if I error on the side of protecting my family unit over breaking up my family to follow ALL of the Church’s requirements – which are really only possible if I were to quit working to do everything it requires – oh wait maybe not, because then I couldn’t pay tithing :)
    #3 – I have to have my own personal relationship with Heavenly Father regardless of what I think is true or not true and completely independent of my wife’s divine relationship or whether she really cares to have one or not.
    #4 – Love – it always wins in the end, always.

    I’m not a therapist, and I probably need one myself dealing with what I’m going through, but these are the 4 things that get me through the crisis I’m going through both personally and with my wife – who I love and will protect for as long as I am able.

    I hope they help even just a little.

  25. Context is everything. Janelle didn’t say where she lives but it seems she is in a ward filled with people of long Mormon ancestry and high callings. In my ward, most of the members are from part-member families. They would not understand the suffering Janelle is going through and would probably think she was being a little overly dramatic about the whole situation.

  26. Its not easy to share such personal aspects of one’s life. I commend Janelle for sharing her story. We need to hear every voice in this issue, even ones we struggle to understand.

  27. I really enjoyed this podcast. I could really relate to many of the things that Janell was going throught. Though I have since left the church, I remember member being aproaced by well meaning ladies who thought that since my husband wasn’t attending church with me that our mariage must be falling apart. I know so many in the church who feel that temple marage is a magic shield aginst marital problems. I think she is lucky to have such an understanding and supportive church community and it is rare to find that. Every one’s situation is so different, I think we can all learn someting from this couple’s experience.

  28. Janelle,

    Wow. Thank you for sharing your feelings in such a frank and honest way. Sharing these things is not easy, but you did it with complete candor while maintaining respect for you and your husband’s relationship and privacy. We don’t often talk about difficult subjects like this, yet many face similar challenges and feel alone in their struggles. They now have a great example of a couple that has faced this type of challenge, and are dealing with it with respect in the marriage. Kudos to you and your husband. You sound rational, well adjusted and seem to be dealing with a challenging situation in a heroic way. Thanks for sharing.

  29. I want to say thank you to all those who have reached out to Janelle in such a positive way – even when having to put your own feelings aside to validate hers. This is the level of maturity and grace I was hoping for here on Mormon Stories and it makes me much more willing to invite other guests on the show than I had felt initially. My heart, thoughts and feelings are with all of you who have expressed pain and sadness through a similar process – on either side of the fence.
    Again, thank you.

  30. @ Henri, hugs to you. Sorry you are suffering so much. Sorry your wife is suffering so much. I wish there was a way to assist people to see that for so much promise of a plan of happiness, this plan does not allow for happiness unless all agree to the LDS theology. If one does not then it really is a life of sadness, betrayal, hopelessness, anger, division etc. May a miracle happen in your home soon, Henri.

  31. I finally listened to the second part twice. Pain is pain. Empathy and sympathy are feelings we can share. Compassion for all who suffer, the one hurt by Celestial dreams shattered and the one hurt by having been honest and occurs as the one who caused the hurt by not following through on a perceived or an actual promise. Janelle, thanks for sharing even the hard stuff.

  32. @ natasha. Thanks for reminding us that we need to be mature and sensitive to other people’s feelings. I would love to see more people like Janelle on Mormon Stories because she represents a large portion of the Mormon community. We need to listen to her and try to understand her so we can find common ground in this process. I hope you are able to interview more people like Janelle so we can find common ground.

  33. Thank you Natasha for a wonderful interview. My heart goes out to this woman and I ache for her. I am also proud of her for her courage and determination to stay with her faith in spite of her husband’s difference of opinion. Her children will be blessed for her efforts, and those of her husband’s who has not forsaken his family.

  34. Such an interesting perspective…. thanks for sharing it. I can only say that it gets better. As the disaffected one, it isn’t easy re creating the relationships that matter most to you…. it would be much easier to stay within the fold and basically compartmentalize your life so you can “stay in the closet” as it were…. however for the overall health of the living system… it is best to reach out towards wholeness through growth. Individuation can happen for both of these spouses to pursue their own individual truths…. while still loving and being together.

    I think that as the wife re listens to herself in the coming years she will see and hear her words in a completely different perspective that will include seeing the hidden assumptions she carries in her worldview…

    I would encourage some experimenting with transformational learning… examine your beliefs and begin to look at your identity and determine where you have fused your identity with your beliefs…. beliefs change over time and as a result… they are something that should be object and not subject to our core identities…. when you begin to separate your beliefs from your identity (moving beliefs from subject to object) you will be able to view your beliefs in a clearer context…. and you can let go freely of those beliefs that are in alignment with your experience…. so experiment with your beliefs…. they were given to you by someone else… a culture, a family, a religion…. examine them…. ask yourself if this particular belief matches up with your experience…. and if not… see if you can shift your belief… rather than denying your experience…

    We are meaning making individuals… and the meaning we make from our experiences is directly related to the power we give to others outside ourselves to create that meaning for us…. for example…. I had this experience…. and letting someone else tell you that therefore it means such and such….

    our lenses through which we see and experience and create our realities is made up of these gifted beliefs, perspectives, culture and values that have been given to us by others…. make yourself the meaning maker by claiming your own voice to create meaning given the current reality that you find yourself in…. you’ll find more love and larger and larger perspectives of consciousness if you do so….

    good luck….

  35. Janelle – first of all thank you for doing this interview. Being willing to open up and talk about your marriage and this trial is not easy. I have a ton of respect and admiration for you. My wife and I have gone/are going through many of the same trials as you and your husband. We are trying to make it work and your story hits home for us.

    Nevertheless, I finished this episode a little frustrated at the obvious gap between the perspective that Janelle shared and that which I assume her husband has. If we are going to have a real discussion and real empathy, the disaffected has to understand the believer’s perspective, and the believer has to understand the disaffected’s perspective. I feel like this episode gave us a great insight into Janelle’s mind, what she is going through, how far she has come, and her outlook. If that is all this episode sought to do then it was a success. It sounds like Rich is a great guy, and you repeatedly commented on how patient he is and how he has been so accommodating. I think the saddest part of this episode was when you answered that rather than try to engage your husband and what he was going through, it sounds like fairly early on you decided that the two of you simply had different views and agreed to disagree. As one going through a faith crisis in my own marriage I understand how that might help, the constant tension gets really old and sometimes it might just be better to retreat back to your respective trenches and make the best of it. But I mourn the intellectual separation that necessarily creates. I hope that all of us married folks will be always willing to listen and consider our spouses perspective. I think Rich should consider yours, and you his. It doesn’t sound like you have actually done that for him.
    P
    lease don’t take this as being negative toward you Janelle, I don’t know you personally and I have a ton of empathy for what you’re going through. I grew up in the church, am still active, and I know the pain you’re going through. But as the person who is in a position similar to your husband, as I listened to this episode some of your comments made me wish Natasha had dug a little deeper.

    When you talked about your foray into understanding the issues that caused your husband to lose his belief, you made the following statements (your words are in quotes):
    “there was a bad feel”
    “it is anti-mormon literature”
    “I had a testimony, served a mission, and had confirmation from the Holy Ghost as to what was true”
    I understand what you’re saying. I too have served a mission, and I too have felt what I considered powerful spiritual experiences. I don’t discount what you felt. But is it possible (and have you considered the possibility) that you felt a certain way, and yet that feeling was something other than God confirming truth? How do you explain the billions of other people in other religions who also experience powerful transformative spirituality? Born-again Christians for example, describe their spiritual experiences in almost exactly the same way. Keep in mind God called all these other religions an abomination, and our church teaches that although they have ‘some’ truth, that our church is the one and only true church. So how can you distinguish your spiritual experiences from theirs? How do you know yours is more true, or that any of them are based on something external (like God) versus something internal (human nature)?

    Have you considered the possibility that the negative dark feelings you associate with information critical of the church might be a result of the fact that if it were true then you would have to give up cherished beliefs? If that is the case, then it isn’t God telling you to stay away from this information, it is your wiring as a human. A Muslim reading anti-Islam material, or a Hindu reading pro-Buddhist material might feel the exact same aversion that you are experiencing.

    This would not be such a problem except for the fact that you are structuring your life around those experiences, in spite of what you feel is evidence to the contrary. Which brings me to my next point –
    “I knew where I stood, I didn’t need to go into all these books and all this information that is out there”

    So that’s it, you already know the church is true so you’ve already made up your mind about stuff you haven’t read? The unwillingness to examine information that has profoundly affected your marriage and your life seems to be quite a paradox. You believe with absolute conviction, yet you’re uncomfortable even reading information that potentially contradicts your belief. Even when your husband (who previously believed, served a mission, and told you that he wanted to teach his and your children about the Savior) tells you that he has read it, and that it has had an impact on him, I find it hard to fathom that you wouldn’t at least learn WHY he decided he had to do this.

    Imagine he read a pro-vegan book, said it was amazing, and decided to become a vegan because of it. He encouraged you to read it, if for no other reason than to understand why he’s made the change. He said feel free to eat however you want, but this is how I’ve chosen to eat based on new information. Wouldn’t you read it? You’re probably a lot less attached to your diet than you are to Mormonism, but shouldn’t the increased level of attachment actually increase your interest?

    I think you don’t look at that material not because you are so confident in your faith, but because you are afraid that you husband is correct and that you will have to give up things you like about the church. You like the church, and that’s ok.

    “I didn’t need Joesph Smith to be perfect to love the gospel”

    Neither do I. I never thought Joseph Smith was perfect, nor do I think that has ever been taught or believed by church members. In fact, Joseph Smith himself said “I never told you I was perfect—but there is no error in the revelations which I have taught” (this was even quoted by Elder Oaks in the April ’96 conference)

    I could go on and on about the evil things that Joseph Smith did to people, including young teenage girls. You probably know a lot of that. These weren’t simply imperfections Joseph Smith had. You do a disservice to yourself and to your husband when you mischaracterize and trivialize what caused him to stop believing. It shows a lack of empathy for what he has gone through and for his journey. I say this based not only on this one statement but your whole two hours of conversation. It is obvious that you haven’t actually understood what your husband has gone through. The Book of Abraham problem isn’t trivial. The Book of Mormon issues aren’t trivial. The church’s continued racist teachings are a serious problem. There are literally dozens of other MAJOR problems. If you choose to believe in spite of them then nobody is criticizing your belief. But don’t dismiss the beliefs of others who have gone through so much pain. Have some empathy for your husband and acknowledge that these issues are legitimate – that doesn’t make you an apostate, it just makes you sound like you’ve actually listened and considered another perspective.

    1. I don’t know if this is too old to make a comment on, but I’d like to say I agree so much with what you’re saying. I craved someone to look at what I had learned and have a dialogue with me, just to understand me. It is so painful to have someone not care enough just to look, especially a spouse, who is supposed to have your back.  I think part of the problem is that in the temple interview, there is a question about sympathizing with others that have opposing beliefs. The fear of information is programmed very deeply in some and can be difficult to overcome

    2. Just by virtue of disaffecting, the unbeliever is saying that he is smarter than God and that the believer is sort of a mindless idiot that can’t think for herself. So he is not a more evolved and compassionate person for leaving the faith. I read some of those ‘compelling’ books about how the church must not be true and it actually made it worse that my husband could think that one word of that mindless dribble could possibly be based on reality, instead of the ravings of a maniac.

      I wish all these angry Defectors could feel the excruciating anguish of walking around with a knife in their back, put there by the one person who was suppose to cherish and protect them. I wish you understood it feels to have every single choice taken away from you, to be so powerless about your own life. 

      Show some RESPECT.

  36. To Derek:

    While I don’t disagree completely with your position, you also are making assumptions about the basis of other people’s beliefs, and assume that they are given to them or created by culture, family or religion, apart from experience. Perhaps as you re-read your post, you will see that your worldview is based on postulates that, when mingled with your experience base, lead you to conclusions which may contradict the valid experiences and conclusions of others. I do agree that we need to be our own “meaning makers” as you put it. Just don’t discount the beliefs and experiences of others because they are in conflict with your own meaning. To do otherwise is to elevate your reason and experience above those of others. At best this feels arrogant and perhaps misguided for you and those you may influence.

  37. Disappointed that many questions were not asked. I’m still at a loss as to what were the issues/history that the husband discovered/was dealing with? How did she feel about the issues he was raising? Did she research those issues too?? If not, why not?

  38. @GailK – Thanks for what you said. It is hard, and I’m not sure at all how this will settle out.

    @Joe:
    You had a lot of good questions. For questions 1-3 I would say that, Yes, it would have made things better if those scenarios were reality; not sure it would have changed my disaffection entirely, but it would have very much changed how I handled it and I am sure how my wife is handling it right now. The attitude of you’re either with us or against us has surely put me in the against catagory even though I am not against the church. I just feel very strongly that it is not true.

    Question 4:
    Yes I did enjoy church. I held many callings, many of them in leadership positions, and I am sure that many people thought I would one day move my way up the ladder. Now I feel like a stranger and a foreigner; the bishop knows how I feel so it is always uncomfortable being around him even though I like him a lot. We are at a bit of an impass, he and I, because now I am the only one in my family without a TR even though I am completely worthy (still pay tithing, attend church, follow WOW, am honest and moral, etc.); he can’t give me a recommend until I answer the belief questions to his satisfaction and I won’t lie.

    Question 5:
    This is a tough one to answer because if such a statement was forth-coming, I would say that they were lying, or at the very least, were completely self-deluded.

    Most of the old testament is based on myth. The book of Genesis is no truer than Brothers Grimm. The new testament is questionable and unreliable as an eye-witness account. The Book of Mormon is not historical at all. The Pearl of Great Price (i.e.the Book of Abraham)was translated from nothing. The Doctrine and Covenents comes down to whether Joseph Smith really received revelations from God or not; Section 132 is proof-positive to me that he didn’t.

    With all these serious scriptural problems, I cannot accept that there is a single divine institution based on them. That takes out all Christianity, Judism, and Islam. I know nothing about eastern religions, but I am safe to assume that they are based on myth as well.

    So the answer to your final question is No. This would not be enough for me. To me truth trumps faith everytime. If the things that can be verified are shown to be wrong, then there is no reason to accept the things that cannot be verified.

  39. I found these interviews extremely difficult to sit through. If a random listener had tuned in late and missed the introduction, he/she would have likely assumed that Janelle had caught her husband in some horrible crime – molesting their children, selling crack, etc. However, it turns out the only “crime” her husband committed was daring to make his own decisions about his own spiritual life. Perhaps I’m wrong here, but Janelle seems to believe that her husband doesn’t have the right to hold religious opinions different from her own. On the other hand, he clearly is not making a similar demand of her – she is free to be active in the LDS church and even bring their children. Her comments brought back painful memories of what I went through with my own family when I became disaffected with the church. No one cared about my reasons or acknowledged any credibility to my experiences. Instead, just for not “towing the line” I was treated pretty much like a criminal. Nevertheless, I believe this interview was useful in showing the feelings of a typical TBM when their spouse becomes disaffected. I think the couple on the previous MS interview were atypically liberal Mormons.

  40. The reason Janelle doesn’t address her husbands concerns is because she has a strong testimony. Too strong to even entertain looking at anything that would even remotely possibly change her mind about her faith. I was the same way.
    My DH is the same way at *this* point. I do suspect there will come a time when we can present our cases to one another (his being why the church is true and mine being why the church is false) and decide on what is best for our family dynamics. One thing is for sure, we are in this for eternity. He need not mourn that ever! If he ever got encouraged to leave me over this I would simply fake it and be TBM again because although that path would probably make me terminally ill, I love him THAT much!!

  41. I think one think that affected this podcast is Natasha’s training as a therapist. When someone is feeling emotionally fragile, as Janelle does on this topic, it is hard to ask questions that can be challenging. I think the biggest question I have is;

    Assuming Rich has worked hard to rectify his issues and he just can’t get the answer that Janelle would like him to get, what should he do? It seems that he has a very high level of personal integrity that drives him to make choices that make his life hard. Does this make him more admirable or easier to despise?

    It seems that they are both in a very tough situation, but what is done can’t be undone, and all beliefs are equal (and in a marriage it is tough for some beliefs to be more equal than others).

    I admire Janelle for having the guts to come on, and can see how her whole Celestial world came apart. I hope after some time and a little more healing has occurred she will see the difference between her husband and many others who are disaffected. He came and told her and brought his life into agreement with his sincere beliefs. Many just quit believing, fake it, and lie, and after 10 years they don’t know each other, they file for divorce, and things are rough without a path to recovery.

    Good luck Janelle and Rich.

  42. I want to add that I think that Natasha did a good job, based on how things went. The object was to get the story out, not beat up on someone who was feeling pretty beat up on by fate.

  43. After listening to this podcast and reading the comments on it, I am of the opinion that this episode should not have been released for the following reasons:
    1- Janelle is too exposed here.
    2- Janelle is a friend of Natasha, and as such, Natasha is overly protective of her. This compromises Natasha’s ability to honestly question Janelle and challenge Janelle on some of her statements.
    3- Natasha says earlier in these comments that she is not acting as a therapist, but as an interviewer. This makes her a voice for the audience, not a protector for the subject of that interview. Natasha’s professional (as a therapist) responsibility/practice of giving positive regard to the patient interfered with the journalist’s (yes, this is journalism) responsibility to the listener. A patient/friend is put in a very dangerous position as the subject of this type of interview.

    Furthermore, Janelle was not a good example, in my opinion, of ‘dealing with’ her husband’s disaffection. I could go into detail, but it is not fair to Janelle, and it brings me full circle to my original contention that this podcast should not have been released.

    Perhaps there could be a small focus group, if there is not already one, of disinterested persons to vet a podcast before release.

  44. I greatly appreciated this podcast. It takes tremendous courage to spill your guts for two and a half hours about something so personal and controversial and then have us vulture pore over every word of it. Please note that any comment I have that may be construed as critical is a criticism of a position and not intended as a personal attack.

    This podcast was of particular personal significance to me. My wife of nearly a decade and I have separated and in all probability will soon divorce. It would be an exaggeration and simplistic to say that my disaffection from the church caused this but it was definitely the straw (or the ton of straw) that broke the camel’s back.

    I appreciate hearing another person who more consistently adheres to the TBM philosophy than some of the previous, more liberal guests. Many of the responses seemed so much like something my wife would (or has) said that it was nice to see that I wasn’t married to someone who was unusually dogmatic. As I attempt to be intellectually honest in my reflection, I realize that I was very much the same way and risk being just as certain (and perhaps dead wrong) on the other side.

    A couple of questions for Janelle or others that feel the way she does.

    1. The straw man of “Hey, nobody Joseph was perfect” has been brought up. A further corollary to this is the idea that Joseph’s faults should make us believe even stronger since it shows that God works through imperfect people. My question is whether there is any test that could be put forth that would show that a man is NOT a prophet?

    2. One of the points brought up by both Janelle and (much earlier) Jackie was their belief that their family would ultimately be eternal. I guess that one of the breaking points in my own relationship was the acceptance that, based on all known doctrine, unless I repented and came back, this would not be the case. It is my understanding that when a man doesn’t keep his covenants his wife will be “given to another” (Brigham’s words, not mine.) Is there any doctrinal basis other than the belief in mercy and a loving God to support an eternal family when a man loses his testimony?

    Thanks again for the podcast. It takes a ton of courage for both of you.

  45. I agree with Michael Nelson that this episode should not have been released. If one of my four married children were dealing with either their own disaffection, or their spouse’s disaffection, toward the LDS church, I would not want them to listen/learn from this podcast. My reasons are not important. Suffice to say organized religion can be so hurtful. I can’t imagine God wills it so. As my sweet dying Aunt Cleo said, when I tried to present the Plan of Salvation to her, “I have lived a good life. No one really knows about Heaven. Let me be surprised. I hope my dear Everett will be there.”

    I appreciate both Janelle and Nastasha’s willingness to engage. Strong support affirmations to you both. I mean that.

  46. I have to disagree with Michael Nelson and George Windes – this was a helpful and informative podcast and I’m glad it was released. Is it possible that Michael and George would feel differently if they still were believing Mormons? Perspective makes such a difference and hearing Janelle’s story helped me to better understand how I can be a better friend to others in similar situations. Of course, God doesn’t want us to be so torn apart by our differences in religious beliefs, George. I think Janelle would agree with that. She is human like the rest of us and it’s so important for us all to make an effort to understand each other, even and especially when we don’t agree.

  47. I don’t understand why the last two commenters have said this shouldn’t be released. Are we going to censor MS because we don’t agree with someone’s point of view? I agree that the perspective may be painful for many of us that go through this but the purpose of MS (at least in part) is to present all different peoples’ experiences with Mormonism. Janelle’s views are those shared by a lot of TBM spouses. A lot of people feel this way. Is the fact that this view exists in abundance simply a truth that “isn’t very useful” and we should just not hear?

  48. This was so painful to listen to. As the disaffected one in my marriage (although I am still active in the church) so much of what Janelle said hit close to home for me. She outlined all my fears about what others will think of me if I ever tell people at church how I really feel. Thankfully, my husband has responded differently. Even though he is one of the most orthodox TBMs I know, he has been willing to explore all of my concerns right along with me. While he has arrived at different conclusions than I have, he has been always made me feel like we are still on the same team and I know he understands why I feel the way I do. We can discuss things without drama or contention. I realize now what a blessing it is that our marriage is based on love for each other, not the church.

  49. I very much valued this podcast, and commend Janelle for the interview. Her, her husband, and what they went through echo very much what my husband and I are currently going through. I found this interview very informative, and hope more like these continue. Again, thank you to Natasha and Janelle for sharing this story!

  50. I’m gonna give the second part a try, but the last 15 minutes of the first part were just…

    I dunno, Janelle seems like she’s just not ready to talk about this in a way that’s constructive for a podcast.

  51. I found the second part more compelling. I’m always interested to hearing how parents manage childrearing, particularly when they have major differences.

  52. It didn’t sound to me like Janelle was “dealing” with her husbands disaffection at all! It was a pity party and goodness it got annoying.

  53. It’s just proof that when you marry a church member, you are really marrying the church. But that is not unexpected in the evolutionary “group selection” process. It’s one reason I had to leave the group (church). If you are not 100% in agreement with what the group leaders say, you are probably better off outside of it.

  54. I thought Janelle and Natasha did a great job, and we shouldn’t negate her feelings or experiences because they may be in conflict with our own…they are her realities. I do wish that Janelle could have answered some of the harder questions, but it is definitely harder when you are a more emotional/sensitive individual.

    I think it would be a nice perspective to have Rich do a podcast. It seemed that to Janelle, Rich didn’t show any pain with his disaffection, but I wonder if that is true. I don’t think leaving the church is an easy thing, but maybe I am wrong on that one.

    In regards to Eric’s comment, “If you are not 100% in agreement with what the group leaders say, you are probably better off outside of it.” I don’t agree 100% with that statement :). For instance, I don’t agree with a lot that goes on within the government, but I stay invested in it that way I can help change things. I feel the same about most groups or even religions, if I am of value to them, why leave. However, for some the time to leave may be when they no longer feel of value…or sadly, the group no longer finds value in the individual.

    Keep rockin’ Mormon Stories!

  55. @Nate

    The problem is that the church indoctrinates your children as well (in addition to the wife). And the church trumps your own authority in all matters. So it often comes to a point where children will respect the church over their own father if there is a disagreement between the two. This is a pretty big deal, especially when the church teaches some things with which I do not agree. I’d like to teach my children what I believe is healthy and avoid them becoming infected with unhealthy church teachings.

    So for me at least, there is no foot halfway inside – it is either all the way in or all the way out. Fence-sitters, intellectuals, doubters, rationalizers, etc. are addressed in nearly every general conference, always in a condescending and berating tone. This is their way of control. And this is no way to run a family, unless you like the church raising your kids and men disrespecting you in front of your family every six months. By the way, I am not married yet. But this is why I decided to formally leave the church. It’s not up to my standards.

    1. So you believe that the Father has the right to choice for himself. But his children DON’T have the freedom to make their own choices if they are contrary to the disaffector.  Because you  assume the Church is automatically wrong on everything.

      1. The church claims they are the ultimate authority for everything. This idea failed for me, and I don’t want my children introduced to this idea.

  56. @ Eric – I respect your views and decision. For me, the world is full of shades of grey and not so much black and white…so you could say I am a fence sitter, but I get a nice view of both fields.

  57. Janelle, participating in this interview no doubt took great courage. I am sincerely grateful to hear about your experience. We need to hear more voices like yours in these forums. It gives everyone a chance to patiently practice what they preach about acceptance, validation etc.

    Personally, I feel much fear and anguish in this interview and I hope that things will continue to improve so that this will not need to be considered a cross that you have to bear for your whole life. Sometimes I think about how much emphasis our church puts on having the right set of beliefs when many other various traditions and philosophies (including atheism) value the same “truths” or characteristics. Being Christ-like sometimes is very similar to being buddha-like. If God really is concerned so much about our beliefs more than the substance of our characters than 99.95% of the world (past and present) is in big trouble.

    Your husband is simply not convinced when all the information is laid on the table. It’s not a matter of compromised ethics or morality, its a matter of lacking evidence. It seems clear though that he is smart enough to recognize the joy he has experienced sharing his life with you and your happiness is apparently a priority for him. You seem like a loving person and I hope that you will feel peace knowing better than anyone else what the true character of your husband really is. Good luck in your journey. Thanks again for the great interview.

  58. Janelle, thank you for putting yourself out there, in such a sensitive discussion. I’m going through a disaffection process myself, and my wife is in your shoes. This is all very new to us, so it’ still painful and fresh. I greatly appreciate you giving your perspective.

    I try to put myself in other’s shoes, to better be able to empathize with their viewpoint, and this podcast helped me with that. In many ways I wish I could still believe in the church, it would make things so much easier for me and my family. But after all information is out on the table, I just cannot. I try to be respectful of those that do, and don’t want to impose my feelings on others. We need more tolerance and love in this messy world. I was disturbed by some of the harsh comments on here, wish you and your husband all the best!

  59. From Chris:
    “If God really is concerned so much about our beliefs more than the substance of our characters than 99.95% of the world (past and present) is in big trouble.”

    There is SO much truth to that; I made that my FB status just now.

  60. This was very difficult to listen to for me for a variety of reasons I will not go into. Regarding the feedback on the interview, I’m of the opinion that negative or positive opinions on the interview should be considered valid and not censured. You can’t expect a disaffected individual to listen to this and not potentially be offended and have some strong reactions that they want to vent. Conversely, you can’t be surprised that others will respond to those negative comments in a sensitive manner if they agree with the opinion of the woman interviewed or have similar experiences.

    She feels the way she feels…so what? Her emotions and the choices she makes on how to deal with them are hers to own and account for on her journey. It may not be how I see it or do it, but it’s her process. Additionally, no one should be surprised by a strong backlash to her opinions. The stronger the opinion, the stronger the response.

    We all face unintended consequences of our choices and on a public forum like this a broad spectrum of reactions should be expected. She and the interviewer should be prepared for it. Religion, whether you’re in it or out of it, is a very hot topic.

    In the end, kudos to her and everyone for digging in for what they stand for. Don’t apologize for or minimize what you believe. It’s the rawness of those opinions that spur the most thought and analysis that will make us all better in the end.

  61. I agree with those that felt this podcast was poorly done. This will be the last podcast I listen to in which Natasha Helfer Parker is involved.

  62. My true believing Mormon (TBM) wife is in the same situation as Janelle. I left the Church 2 1/2 years ago. My wife went through a lot of the same emotions and issues. As Janelle’s husband, it was not difficult for me to seperate from the Church when I realized that it was not true and made out to be. What surprized me was, at first, how her church was more important than me. She was, at first, going to divorce me for not staying in the Church. She basically tried to bully me into staying in the Church by threatening divorce and alienating the children from me. Luckily her father and our marriage counselor helped her prioritize and put me and our children above the Church. Up until then, we had had a good marriage without serious problems.

    I also, take responsibility for not handling things correctly at first. I wanted, so bad, for my wife to know the problems and wanted her to know what I knew. I was also pushy and said disrespectful things about her Church and leaders. Saying these things to her just made her more angry and lash back at me.

    I have remained supportive of my wife and three TBM children. I try to avoid saying anything negative to them about the Church. I do attend important family church functions: missionary farewells, music numbers, temple weddings (waiting in the lobby), baby blessings, baptisms, etc. I also, am honest with my wife and children when they ask me questions about my beliefs and issues that I have.

    We both love each other and I believe this love has been the glue that has helped us survive this difficult sitution. I am thankful that we all have been able to work things out and that we have been able to keep our marriage and family together.

  63. I found this very hard to listen to because I am puzzled by a church which is supposed to provide safe haven for us is often such a source of pain. Why is that part never questioned or addressed? I grew up alone in the Mormon church feeling like such a bad person because my parents did not attend. It was only the stories of Jesus’s love for me that made it at all tolerable (and for that I am grateful), but the pain this church’s doctrine causes is tiresome. Where is the joy part? In any case, thanks for sharing your journey. You should feel proud of how you have handled yourself,your goodness shines through your sorrow. God bless you!

  64. I just want to drop a note to Natasha and John. I have listened to everyone one of the podcasts here and I have many friends who have listened to many as well. I just want the two of you to consider the possibility that what you see in the comments section here may not be representative of your listenership. I don’t want to insult anyone on any side here (so everyone brace for the insult, here it comes) but the discourse in this thread and on this site in general is not representative in my experience of how your work is received or thought about. Keep up the good work.

  65. My heart goes out to both Jenelle and Rich. I hope my comments will generate more light than heat, if only in the reflections they produce in others.

    What was not, or perhaps could not, be addressed in this interview was the Church’s role in this couple’s marriage. The Church is the proverbial third partner here – a partner that escaped critical examination or even the prospect of responsibility.

    We claim the LDS Church to be the only true church. Of course this implies that billions of devout others are mistaken on some level about their own. But these billions tend to adopt the same exclusive status for their religions based on similar evidence and experiences. Why doesn’t this fact have salience? What gives religion this power? Is the human need to quell death anxiety, or to sustain kin and group affiliations, or to create a supra-parental attachment figures so overwhelmingly compelling? Evidently it is.

    These thoughts attended my listening. By the end I thought, “If I were a religiously impartial psychologist, I would want to examine the role of the Church in this tripartite relationship. I am concern about the its power. How is it adding to the problem? Has it set up a dynamic that pits is own preservation against that of the couple’s marriage?”

    So, imagine with me such a hypothetical counseling session. The Church, embodied as a dignified older gentleman, sits next to Jenelle and Rich on a couch across from the therapist. Jenelle needs little prompting to open up and explore the sources of her pain. She questions herself; She questions Rich; but she does not question the elderly gentleman. She offers him only intermittent expressions of attachment – expressions made incongruous by the tearful and choking manner of their delivery.

    Rich’s words are few. He would prefer the old gentlemen not be there. But he briefly touches on the gentleman’s betrayal. But immediately he pulls back. He sees his words ricocheting off the gentleman’s benign visage and striking Jenelle.

    When it comes time for the gentlemen to speak, he proffers a sympathetic smile but remains silent. Jenelle takes this for kindness and profound wisdom as her mind spins back on itself. Rich senses the pretentiousness of his silence, but feels ill-equipped to challenge him – and indeed he is.

    The session ends. The elderly gentlemen is first leave, offering a quick prayer for the couple – his only words – they mean something different to everyone. No resolution comes of his silence or this prayer. But the gentleman preserves the narrow marriage script he prescribed to Jenelle and Rich years before. He is ready to keep prescribing it. It has worked sufficiently well for decades – sufficient to create his replacements. Perhaps his replacements will make belated adjustments do a better job. It’s happened before.

    And finally, I indulge myself by offering the script I would give to the old gentlemen. He would say to Jenelle and Rich: “I respect Rich’s position as much as I share Jenelle’s. Indeed, Rich has legitimate reasons for feeling betrayed. I’ve portrayed myself as something more than I am. I ask your forgiveness. I am ready to let you two work things out for yourselves.”

    1. So good. I have often said to my husband (TBM). “It’s not MY fault the church isn’t true. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the church!” The church remains silent….so telling.

  66. Based on some of the comments I thought this would be a horrible interview but Janelle’s story was touching. She did not seem to start weeping because of the situation with her husband. She started weeping when she reflected on the bond with the relief society and the good, thoughtful, and loving women who supported her in a time of need. That is a testament to the relief society and Janelle’s strength in reaching out.

    I also relate to her feeling alone and “different”. I am 38 years old and married to a good man who is not a member and I don’t have children. I, too, feel a pang of sadness when the norm in mormondom is to talk about experiences relating to raising children and temple marriage. She articulated her feelings, a few that I can relate to also, very well. I have to set boundaries too and sometimes those boundaries make me feel like the odd ball, like I can’t participate fully.

    Regarding the level of devastation that Janelle reports; part of her dream of having a temple marriage was shattered. It wasn’t just a temple marriage related to eternity only. I’m sure that her vision included temple marriage in the here and now. She had an idea of what her experience in this life, mortality, would look like. How often have we been saddened and devastated over unmet expectations and curve balls. I think that Janelle has a very positive outlook and approach when raising her children regarding the gospel. Also, Janelle praised Rich’s many attributes wonderfully. I’m sure that he would be proud that she seemed to choose her words carefully and thoughtfully.

    I wish you well, Janelle, truly.

  67. I have been distanced from the church since I was a young missionary, way back in the early 1970s. Yet my “issues” are less concerned with the “historical” aspects of the church’s founders than it is with most people who “leave the church”. My wonderful wife of 36+ years was very aware of these aspects before we wed, in the temple. However, the adjustment she had to make was most difficult; principally because of her definition of “self” was founded upon the church’s view; rather how she saw “herself in the church”. Could the church be blamed for her perspective? I think not; she is responsible for her self. Even after all these decades we still will do the “rounds” when various events arise; but we respect each other more than we care about being “right”. She usually agrees with my analysis of the events in discussion; our disagreement usually concerns her “world view” (the glass is half full) verses my “world view” (the glass is half empty) and how we are to respond to these events. She wants to be the “good person” (what would Jesus do – show kindness and compassion) while I want to be the “intelligent person” (what would Jesus do – over turn the money changer’s tables).

    I have missed out on two of my children’s temple weddings, because when I have honestly voiced my perspectives with the local leadership, even though I have done all the requirements, they have felt “inspired” to refuse a recommend, because they didn’t like my “attitude”? This stance was particularly hard on my wife’s perspective of the church representing the kindness and compassion mentioned above, but she has maintained that the church is the best place for her to serve.

    Just for your information my “issues” with the local leaders are actually politically based, as opposed to being historical or doctrine in nature. Specifically the role of government; which I feel is nothing more nor less than part of the “secret combination” (along with big corporations and the banking system)warned of in the B of M. Of course since a few of the local leaders are employed by the government and banking industry, this explains why a my “attitude” would be repellent to them!

    What has made the difference in maintaining a strong and growing relationship between my wife and I has been the level and number of spiritual experiences we have had independently and together. Even though I am disaffected with the church, I know that the spiritual aspect of mortality is as real as the physical. I believe what happened to Joe Smith because I have had similar experiences. Joe Smith was a mortal, so was any other human that the God(s)have interacted with. To expect “perfection” in fallen mortals is just to set one’s self up for disappointment at some point in the future! So my experiences, of fallen mortals in the church, have had no negative impact on my faith or knowledge in Deity. Rather, I have been driven to seek His insights and perspectives in regards to every thing in my life…and I have been blessed (commanded to take her as my wife, by the Deity directly) with her support in everything; because I could see that I wasn’t going to obtain much spiritual direction from the church’s leaders; besides why would any church leader be expected to give me divine instruction; that’s God’s job not theirs!

    Most people I know use a “formula” approach to running their lives in mortality. By this I mean that they look at how others do things and pattern their thinking and behavior after these others. The definition of the self is initially formed through this process of “socialization” and then at some future point this “would view” runs aground on the rocks of experience. As this happened to me I determined that I could not blame any one else for my choices. So though I have compassion for the Mormons (and any one else) who think that the expression of “true” faith is to follow the “formula” handed down from heaven, through Salt Lake (the church’s programs); it drives me to frustration when I come up against the constant accusation that I can’t have Divine “revelation” because I don’t keep the “formula” to their satisfaction; but I have them never the less!

    Well, there is my story; and I’m sticking to it.

  68. I made a comment here a few days ago and it seems to have been removed. I know you saw it Mr. Dehlin, as I got a FaceBook friend request from you, which I accepted. I was having a hard time listening to Janelle and that it seemed that she was acting like the LDS church was “the other woman”. Well, I am back to listen to part 2. Janelle, you are one lucky woman if all you have to complain about is that your husband is questioning the LDS church. My husband was raised LDS, his dad commited adultry many times, many divorces in his LDS family. Much drug abuse. Count your blessings, my dear. It sounds like your husband is a keeper.

  69. I thought this podcast was well done. Natasha did an excellent job with this. I appreciate Janelle willingness to share her experiences and feelings. This is not an easy thing to do. Especially in a context where after putting yourself out there you can be criticized. I think it shows a lot of strength that Janelle is staying with her husband and putting her family first. Her husband sounds like a great guy. I have a good friend who is going through a similar experience and this podcast helped me understand what she is going through. I think this will help me be a better friend to her.

    It is important to look at different viewpoints. I think it is really hard for the person that is leaving the church. The judgment they receive is unfair. It was nice to get a look at what it is like for the spouse. I see that it is no small thing what they are going through. Maybe I’m too liberal, but I think everyone deserves to tell their story and be heard.

    It is easy to criticize what other’s are feeling. I don’t view emotions or feelings as good or bad, they just are. We don’t choose our feelings. We can choose what we do with them and affect them through our actions and thoughts. I want to validate Janelle’s very real feelings.
    Janelle, thank you for sharing your story and for your example.

  70. I was so grateful to listen to this podcast. I went through an extremely similar experience as Janelle. My marriage just ended in divorce in August. My XH felt very at fault for causing me sadness and felt that he would not be able to make me happy. Although, I tried to tell him that I loved him and wanted him. I was going through a mourning period and I didn’t know how to be better. I even tried to find other women in similar situations, and tried to understand how all of this could work out. I did not have many examples that made things work after a spouse became disaffected from the church. We were both returned missionaries and I was VERY “stalwart” and I was completely devastated at the news that my XH had decided that he did not believe in the church and that he might not even believe in God.
    Although he said these things I did not want to end our marriage.
    I also announced to all of the RS about what was happening so that no one would speculate.
    My XH did nothing to cause me to want to get a divorce and I felt that I had started to get into a better place as far as grieving the disaffection of my spouse. I still would have sad moments, but it wasn’t a “cry fest” every time I thought of it.
    We did not feel safe enough in our relationship to discuss things that were so raw.
    He chose to push us away. He chose a life without a believing spouse over that of feeling like he would be dissapointing me and the kids.
    I wish there was more information out there about how to make a marriage work in the LDS culture when a spouse has disaffected.
    It is so much different than if one is to choose someone that doesn’t believe from the beginning.
    Anyway, I can completely relate and am devastated that my marriage has ended. I am hoping that by some miracle things will be able to work out.
    Neither of us were prepared as to how much disaffection would rock the relationship and lifestyles we would both want in life.

    Thank you for sharing. If I would have listened to this before my divorce I would have truly been comforted to know that someone had a similar situation but was making it work.

    My XH listened to your podcast yesterday and he is actually the one that recommended it to me. It also really touched him and helped him understand a little bit more about where I was coming from.

    Kristin

  71. I found this podcast very sad. I found little to relate to even though my husband disaffected from the church 7 years before me. I could deal with him leaving. I understood why. I accepted him unconditionally. The issue that I had was the abuse of LDS toward me and indirectly toward my husband. ” He is going to hell!” “Im not telling you to go home and give him a ultamatum today but ask him this… what were you thinking when you made promises to me over the alter!”
    “Well ,Ive heard of women that let their men walk all over them but….” implying that I let him mow over me.

    The constand miss understanding why he would not go It lead me to search and realize the Mormon church is flawed all the way through history.

  72. “I wish there was more information out there about how to make a marriage work in the LDS culture when a spouse has disaffected.”

    Someone needs to do this for a dissertation sometime, if it hasn’t been done already. Not even just LDS culture, but marriage and religion in general, where one spouse loses faith or decides to leave… A really big deal. At the same time, issues like this are MUCH bigger when there is not enough underlying emotionally safety, accessibility, responsiveness, engagement, etc…

  73. First time I’ve commented on one of these MS episodes… I’ve listened to ALL of them (except that one that got pulled before I downloaded it). But as someone who’s worked as an analyst (product, business, etc.), I greatly appreciate knowing _why_ I lose customers. Since this one makes me re-think the usefulness of Mormon Stories, I thought it only fair that I let you know why.

    In fairness, I applaud Janelle for her courage and putting herself out there. Not many do it, especially of the believer “side,” so I thank her for that.

    But two aspects of this interview killed it for me. They are:

    1) As other criticisms have already pointed out, I thought it was incredibly one-sided. This was evidenced by both parties being believers and zero opposing viewpoint. (Having her husband on also or having Natasha ask more prodding questions or posing hypotheticals like John often does would have helped.) Natasha, in spite of your “interviewer not therapist” comment earlier, I must say I thought to myself many times during it that you came across as a therapist – completely honoring (uncritically) the patient’s world view. Not objective interview at all.

    I’ve loved some episodes of MS (and also Mo. Expression) where true believers make their case or state their piece. This isn’t about the content disagreeing with my view. But this was not like those cases. This only made me feel pity for Janelle who clearly is unwilling to question her world view in any meaningful way and shows complete unwillingness to compromise. I gasped at Janelle’s great disappointment when the husband took their child on a bike ride instead of going to church. REALLY!? Oh. My. Heck. I almost drove off the road.

    Janelle’s husband must get the award for the most acquiescent apostate I’ve ever heard of!

    (Were it me, that proved I’d have been out of that marriage instantly. The Mormon church is _provably_ not what it claims. The techniques it uses are _provably_ cult-like in many aspects which research _has proven_ foster belief regardless of truthfulness. And – for certain personalities – the orthodox culture and organization is _provably_ hurtful. How about you actually compromise!? Unbelievable. (On the upside, it made me realize my own TBM wife’s reaction was much more rational.))

    2) Number two. An odd one. And sort of petty – I realize. Sorry.

    But Natasha, when you talk, sometimes you finish a phrase with an audible nasal exhale. (I know, petty, right?) But here’s the thing… It sounds like “contempt” or “frustration” to me. It’s like those subtle body language cues we barely notice but that affect our mood. I _intellectually_ realize you don’t mean anything by it. But it’s offputting to me. Weird. I know. Sorry. Maybe just changing the microphone or something could fix that. It was hard to get past.

    —
    For me, Mormon Stories is on the bubble. I have about 6 podcasts I listen to regularly and it’s too much. This is now in the short list of ones to cut, for me. Just thought you should know.

  74. Janelle and Natasha,
    I really appreciated this interview.  And I’ll tell you why.  My husband informed me of his feelings and of his disenchantment with the LDS religion about 9 months ago.  This has been very difficult for me, and for him…  He was a straight A peter priesthood all his life. It has been very hard for him to understand why, after all he’s done he doesn’t have a testimony.  He plead with Heavenly Father for years and sought after him and felt no answer, which broke his heart.  As a “True Believing Mormon” I don’t understand it either and it saddens me and leaves me confused at his situation.  So, this led my husband to explore and learn about church history and it further lengthened the gap of what he used to believe and what he now believes.

    When my husband sat me down, told me his heart breaking story, told me he’s not going to the temple anymore, not wearing his garments anymore,  and would not paying tithing or fast offerings anymore I was devastated.  He then told me he didn’t believe in the scriptures or the prophets either.  I knew his faith had been weakening, but to this extent I was unaware.  I remember going to bed that night and feeling like I was in some kind of a nightmare, my world felt over.  All my dreams since I was 18 of having a righteous priesthood leader in the home and of that ultimate spiritual union and intimacy with a spouse, along with an Eternal Family felt gone forever.  The next morning I hoped it was only a bad dream, but it wasn’t of course. 

    Luckily, time, it seems to heal all things, and despite the bumps and trials we are still a mostly happy functioning family, but with a lot of problems to solve and work out.  I don’t know how things will pan out on the other side of the veil, but I do know the most important thing is for our family to stay together and for me and my husband to work make our home a heaven on earth.  Sometimes things get really hard and super discouraging, but I know that leaving him would be a billion times more devastating than working through this problem and would not help anything.  I just have to think about our wedding day and how beautiful it was, or our children, how happy they are and I know I just need to endure and try to meet him in the middle as much as I can.

    I haven’t talked to my family or friends about any of our struggles, I just can’t bring myself to do it.  And I can’t think of anyone that I know who could understand how I feel.  And I am afraid of how people will look at me and my husband…like I am a failure or something…. or look at us as dysfunctional, and am so afraid of being judged and being felt sorry for.  I really feel like there is no one for me to talk to about this.  This interview has really lifted my burden.  Seeing another couple and how they have gone through what I we are going through to nearly a T has been so therapeutic.  I don’t feel so alone, and so totally unique in my trials. 

  75. Janelle and Natasha,
    I really appreciated this interview.  And I’ll tell you why.  My
    husband informed me of his feelings and of his disenchantment with the LDS
    religion about 9 months ago.  This has been very difficult for me, and for
    him…  He was a straight A peter priesthood all his life. It has been
    very hard for him to understand why, after all he’s done he doesn’t have a
    testimony.  He plead with Heavenly Father for years and sought after him
    and felt no answer, which broke his heart.  As a “True Believing
    Mormon” I don’t understand it either and it saddens me and leaves me
    confused at his situation.  So, this led my husband to explore and learn
    about church history and it further lengthened the gap of what he used to believe
    and what he now believes.

    When my husband sat me down, told me his heart breaking story, told me he’s not
    going to the temple anymore, not wearing his garments anymore,  and would
    not paying tithing or fast offerings anymore I was devastated.  He then
    told me he didn’t believe in the scriptures or the prophets either.  I
    knew his faith had been weakening, but to this extent I was unaware.  I
    remember going to bed that night and feeling like I was in some kind of a
    nightmare, my world felt over.  All my dreams since I was 18 of having a
    righteous priesthood leader in the home and of that ultimate spiritual union
    and intimacy with a spouse, along with an Eternal Family felt gone
    forever.  The next morning I hoped it was only a bad dream, but it wasn’t
    of course. 

    Luckily, time, it seems to heal all things, and despite the bumps and trials we
    are still a mostly happy functioning family, but with a lot of problems to
    solve and work out.  I don’t know how things will pan out on the other
    side of the veil, but I do know the most important thing is for our family to
    stay together and for me and my husband to work make our home a heaven on
    earth.  Sometimes things get really hard and super discouraging, but I
    know that leaving him would be a billion times more devastating than working
    through this problem and would not help anything.  I just have to think
    about our wedding day and how beautiful it was, or our children, how happy they
    are and I know I just need to endure and try to meet him in the middle as much
    as I can.

    I haven’t talked to my family or friends about any of our struggles, I just
    can’t bring myself to do it.  And I can’t think of anyone that I know who
    could understand how I feel.  And I am afraid of how people will look at
    me and my husband…like I am a failure or something…. or look at us as
    dysfunctional, and am so afraid of being judged and being felt sorry for. 
    I really feel like there is no one for me to talk to about this.  This
    interview has really lifted my burden.  Seeing another couple and how they
    have gone through what I we are going through to nearly a T has been so
    therapeutic.  I don’t feel so alone, and so totally unique in my trial. 

     

  76. I am going through this right now with my husband…he just told me yesterday he doesn’t believe in the church anymore due to things he read online. Thank you for posting this..I feel so much of what is being shared when she learned about her husband’s dissatisfaction with the church. I would love it if she would contact me if she has the time. I am really hurt and disappointed and am an emotional mess. I am trying to figure out where to go from here and I’d love to be able to talk to someone about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *